Posted on 02/24/2006 6:58:15 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
Professor David Fergusson, director of the Christchurch Health and Development Study in New Zealand, is firmly pro-choice. But I suspect the good professor might understand if I point out that, lately, he’s been getting a little taste of what it’s like to be pro-life.
Fergusson and two colleagues, L. John Horwood and Elizabeth Ridder, conducted a study on abortion and mental health. And they didn’t find what they expected to find. Their report states, “Those having an abortion [under age 25] had elevated rates of subsequent mental health problems including depression, anxiety, suicidal behaviours and substance use disorders.” Their report goes on to say, “The findings suggest that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.”
Talk about irony. We’re used to hearing about the “mental health” aspects of abortion, of course—but usually, we’re being told that a woman’s mental health is in danger if she doesn’t have an abortion. At the very least, this new study forces pro-choicers to question the all-too-common assumption, an assumption that now is putting young women in danger.
Not that most pro-choicers want to hear this, of course—and particularly not now, with the Supreme Court just having agreed to hear an appeal of the partial-birth abortion ban case, where the issue turns on exceptions about the mother’s health. This is why I said that Dr. Fergusson is learning something about what it’s like to be pro-life. This well-regarded researcher and his team normally have no trouble at all getting their work published. But in this case they had to go to four different journals before they could find one that would publish their study. Fergusson has told interviewers that he knows it’s because his findings are too “controversial”—so controversial that New Zealand’s Abortion Supervisory Committee warned him against publishing his work, not for scientific reasons, but for political ones.
Well, Fergusson himself dislikes the idea that pro-lifers will use his work, and he knows that his research could have a devastating effect on the abortion movement in his country. In New Zealand, as the Herald explained, “Every abortion requires two ‘certifying consultants’ to approve it on certain grounds, usually that a woman’s mental health would be [otherwise] endangered.” You can see what the implications would be if the greater “mental health” risk turns out to be having the abortion.
My hat is off to Dr. Fergusson. Despite the controversy, and despite the fact that his results disagreed with his own beliefs, Fergusson was determined to publish them anyway. And he told the Herald, “It verges on scandalous that a surgical procedure that is performed on over one in 10 women has been so poorly researched and evaluated, given the debates about the psychological consequences of abortion.”
That, my friends, is a true professional and a true scientist speaking. It’s people like this who give science a good name. He’s not willing to ignore the elephant in the middle of the room just because no one else wants to talk about it. Instead, he insists on getting the truth out in the open. And that’s what science ought to be all about—not just in New Zealand, but here.
It is the only way that those mediocrities can get ahead. They step over the bodies of those they deceive and laugh all the way to the palace of
Versailles.
UNBELIEVABLE! If anyone ever doubts for one single minute who the true zealots, fanatics are, it's beyond me! The libs will stop at nothing, nothing to have their agenda promulgated. We should always let studies, if legitimate, speak for themselves, regardless of where we stand. If I heard of a thousand studies showing that women who had abortions had higher esteem for themselves, landed better jobs, got handsomer husbands, and lived longer, I'd still be AGAINST it.
As always, Mr. S, thanks for the excellent Colson post.
Are you sure it's fundamentalist Christian religion she's turned to, or maybe she actually turned to Jesus and her way of manifesting that change is by exhibiting and practicing what some people refer to as "fundamentalist" religion.
ping!
You are welcome, of course.
Kept very quiet is the fact that the number of suicides each year is higher than the road toll... and way at the top of the list of not to mention stats are the 18,000 abortions the New Zealand government funds each year.
It's all about doing away with our own population.
,,, surprise, surprise.
,,, God's Blessings on you! Wonderful account you've written here. Superb.
ping
"Kept very quiet is the fact that the number of suicides each year is higher than the road toll ..." John, that is truly frightening!
If I am not on it already, could you add me to your ping list?
TIA
I'd be interested to know if any woman seeking an abortion under this standard has ever been denied an abortion.
I am guessing they have all been approved on the spot and without debate.
And another liberal ICON and belief is proved DEAD WRONG, and begins to bit the dirt.
Which ping list do you want to get onto, the Colson list, the Pro-life list or both?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.