Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

File a FCC complaint: Oprah violates FCC indecency guidelines.
http://www.oprah.com/tows/pastshows/200602/tows_past_20060223.jhtml

Posted on 02/24/2006 7:05:39 AM PST by mft112345

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: mft112345

Where can I meet one of these so called sex addicts?


41 posted on 02/24/2006 7:54:47 AM PST by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE

Well I have to ask... what is 'salad tossing'?


42 posted on 02/24/2006 7:56:37 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

If this is the level of discussion this web site is sinking to I may as well start my morning somewhere else. Just because you have a problem with Oprah is no reason to waste Jim Robinson's band width.


43 posted on 02/24/2006 7:56:48 AM PST by Rob45and2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mft112345

Why give Oprah any more free publicity than she already gets. Going after her would backfire totally unless there really was a groundswell of 20 to 60 year old American women who were deeply offended at Oprah enough to mount a call in campaign. I don't think that is the case. To the contrary, these women are the ones who would run to Oprah's defense against any attempt to "silence" her. I don't think this is a fight the Bush administration wants to pick.


44 posted on 02/24/2006 7:57:05 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

The sad thing is that she really doesn't have to do this...she's going to watch it and regret it. A woman having sex with 90 guys? Yawn...go talk to your average college co-ed....


45 posted on 02/24/2006 7:59:59 AM PST by Hildy (The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

I think that some on this thread should be more honest with themselves and admit they hate Oprah. Comparing Oprah and howard is ridiculous.


46 posted on 02/24/2006 8:01:11 AM PST by cyborg (I just love that man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

It's fair to dislike the reasoning behind the FCC indecency standard (even to crave more indecent speech broadcast to children if that's your thing) but she violated the rule.
It was gratuituous to discuss sexual bodily fluids and she did it for money.


47 posted on 02/24/2006 8:03:57 AM PST by mft112345 ("The wise man will make more opportunities than he finds." Sir Francis Bacon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mft112345
On a related note, there is a commercial for a feminine product called Rephresh that is as offensive as anything I've ever seen.

I called them to complain, as well as stations that have aired it.

If I see it again, I will file a complaint with the FCC. Thanks for the link.

48 posted on 02/24/2006 8:04:47 AM PST by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mft112345
You and I don't disagree. My point is that the FCC does not enforce it's own rules.
49 posted on 02/24/2006 8:06:46 AM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

This is the author whose book was marketed as a "memoir". Oprah chose the book as her "book of the month" and it rocketed to the best seller list. Smokinggun.com revealed it was full of embellishments; Oprah defends Frey on Larry King and later retracted after her "fans" wrote stinging letters to her about "truth-telling". She got a lot of egg on her face over that flip-flop.


50 posted on 02/24/2006 8:11:20 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mft112345

Oprah....Stern....nuff said.


51 posted on 02/24/2006 8:12:39 AM PST by auto power
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14

Except that some (like me) tuned in after the announcement was made and landed right in the middle of the sex talk. A quick change of the channel fixed it in my livingroom.


52 posted on 02/24/2006 8:13:29 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

If you have to ask, you don't want to know ;)

Google it.


53 posted on 02/24/2006 8:14:11 AM PST by IGOTMINE (Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Great idea. Just ignore it and it will go away. Maybe I'll try that with the Marxists and homosexuals who are trying to indoctrinate my daughter in the schools.

We'll call it "The Ostrich Technique". Thanks for the good advice.

54 posted on 02/24/2006 8:16:42 AM PST by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mft112345

I dunno, the world has changed a lot since that Clinton Monica story. I don't watch Oprah, but I think that people who do watch would not likely be offended by such comments.

Any underage kids watching such programs already have issues.

This is irrelevant.


55 posted on 02/24/2006 8:17:26 AM PST by Radix (I really love the liberals they put the FUN in funerals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chameleon

Agree, no Oprah fan but one must look at the context.

Wonder if the show did a warning that adult situations were being discussed before the show and after the break of commercials? If not, the show should have and I can see a case being made.


56 posted on 02/24/2006 8:20:09 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I saw some of the show yesterday and had to pick my jaw up off of the floor... Especially when Oprah had an epiphany and interrupted her favorite shrink's analysis and declared that the women's insatiable sexual appetites are the same as over eating!

She then went on to elaborate that being overweight and binging on a bag of potato chips and feeling bad about it later was the same type of behavior. WOW! Until Oprah made the comparison, I would have never thought having life threatening unprotected sex with life threatening virtual strangers was the same as eating a bag of chips. Silly me!
57 posted on 02/24/2006 8:20:32 AM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan; IGOTMINE
If you do google it, you won't look at jelly or syrup the same way. Don't say you haven't been warned ;)
58 posted on 02/24/2006 8:21:27 AM PST by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mft112345
I saw a bit of this, I honestly thought O was going to show some of the slut's home porn flicks.
59 posted on 02/24/2006 8:21:53 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs
I suggest that female sex addicts be sent to me for further study.

Yeah and you'd be screwing the 100+ guys she's had as well.

..catching something you can't wash away I'm sure.

60 posted on 02/24/2006 8:23:25 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson