Posted on 02/25/2006 6:18:25 AM PST by Racehorse
Al Qaeda warned the government of the United Arab Emirates more than three years ago that it "infiltrated" key government agencies, according to a disturbing document released by the U.S. military. The warning was contained in a June 2002 message to UAE rulers, in which the terror network demanded the release of an unknown number of "mujahedeen detainees," who it said had been arrested during a government crackdown in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.
The explosive document is certain to become ammunition for critics of the controversial UAE port deal, who fear the Dubai-based firm could be used by terrorists to sneak money and personnel into the United States.
Little is known about the origins or authorship of the message.
"You are well aware that we have infiltrated your security, censorship and monetary agencies, along with other agencies that should not be mentioned," the message said.
"Therefore, we warn of the continuation of practicing . . . policies which do not serve your interest and will only cost you many problems that will place you in an embarrassing state before your citizens.
"Your homeland is exposed to us. There are many vital interests that will hurt you if we decided to harm them."
The document was among a batch of internal al Qaeda communications captured by U.S. forces in the war on terror.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Translation..... They have three Paki tea boys serving the government office buildings.
The UAE isn't a charitable organization that's giving us the right to dock there for free. We pay them. But that's not why were important to them. We're important because if we weren't there the Iranians would swoop over and take their oil fields. And if we said "dock our ships for free or we're pulling out, they would dock our ships for free. Now, the relationship is equal. When the war is over, it will be unequal in our favor.
My suggestion to the scardy cats who are afraid the UAE won't like them? They should stop acting so desperate. It's not attractive.
Alqaeda sympathizers are right here in our own congress.
Note to Al Qaeda: Jack Bauer is a real person and he is in that van 2 vehicles behind you.......
I'm just standing by my principles. We shouldn't lease our sovriegnty to ANY foriegn governments and I want to know what kind of proof we'll have that money won't find it's way into the hands of terrorists.
Why would they announce this, if it were true?
It seems rather to one's own disadvantage to publicly point out any kind of covert asset or operation of the type that the announcement describes.
I wonder if this isn't just more smoke and mirrors from 'truce offer' Al Qaeda.
.....We pay them....
Because we do business because they ,the GCC, are capitalists and perhaps the most pure capitalists of all.
But then NO ONE will be running U.S. ports!! AND we'll be considered "racists" and xenophobes"!! /sarc
I question the timing of this being Bush's fault.
Or, just maybe instead of relying on propaganda statements from Al Qaeda, he knows the reality of the situation instead. It is amazing how suddenly 4 year old Al Qaeda propaganda is suddenly taken as the gospel truth.
>>lease our sovriegnty
Please. Running parts of port operations is not "leasing our sovriegnty [sic]".
Many foreign-owned companies are already running similar operations in the U.S., including Hutchison Whampoa.
Probably, but Al Qaeda, Zarqawi, bin Laden, and Co. are pretty desperate to stay in first on our threat list right now. Anyone can make the front page by blowing something up. But even that's hard to do if you're spending most of your time hiding under rocks so that you won't get blown up.
Why is it that so few here understand this concept?
ping for later
Lots of reasons to look closely at this deal... we have the time - we're not desperate.
According to Press Guy Scott Mac, this was all reviewed and the President asked all the departments if there was a problem and they said no. Besides he just recently found out about this semi-secret deal in return for use of UAE military bases and ports for our carrier group. (Source; Whitehouse briefing)
According to the President, UAE is one of the strongest supporters of the WOT despite the fact that they supported AQ up until 9-11, contributed two of the terrorist of 9-11, CONTINUALLY GIVE money to the Iraqi insurgents, recognized the Taliban until the US routed them, bankrolls Hamas and served as their media proxy, is a major port corridor for opium and other illegal drugs which finances jihads, and refuses to recognize Israel.
Let's be careful not to be xenophobic and get our facts straight. Let's not be racist--the British company that controlled our ports before (oh you didn't know the US doesn't control dockside activity in six of its major ports--shows you how racist and uninformed you all are) the Brits may secretly be our enemy as well even if they are not fanatical and support worlwide terrorism. It's our racism that blinds us to PRINCIPLE. This deal is right based on PRINCIPLE.
I suggest you all visit the UAE in Abu Dabi and have the Prime Minister wine and dine you to allay your fears. Then you can tour the Dubai port facilities in your own personal convoy of Maybacks. You will see this port deal is good for the global economy and you will find Al Queda a whimsical farce.
There's a "rent-a-crowd" thing going on here. It's causing people to miss the obvious.
No, but there are lots of other ways to send them to their 72 wooooorgins.
Well said. Ignorance is showing on all sides of this issue, IMO.
Proof that they didn't. If they had they'd never dare brag of it--it would undo their work!
Let's be careful not to be xenophobic and get our facts straight. Let's not be racist--the British company that controlled our ports before (oh you didn't know the US doesn't control dockside activity in six of its major ports--shows you how racist and uninformed you all are)
It's liberals who play the race card. It's like telling someone in Salem that someone might think they're a witch ... Telling people they might be "racist" is the attack of a bully. Let's debate this deal on it's merits, not on fear of being "racist" or "not being liked" or "too stupid to know the Coast Guard does security". Let's look at the deal. They need us as much, if not more, than we need them. I don't want to see the Republican Party destroyed over a business deal. If the Dubai thing can be worked out in a fair and safe fashion, fine. If not, fine. Quit acting so, so, like a desperate liberal, (ooohh they won't like us, ooohh oohh, you're a racist etc.) it's pathetic.
Sooooo true
To me it looks like a three year old idle threat.
If the openly claim it, then they probably haven't Its not very good operational security to openly say, 'yes we have compromised your security!' Far better just to be quiet about it.
I was quite surprised and dissapointed to see him so vehemently defend the port deal that he didn't even see before hand. I am confused about this. Just something is up! I trust my gut 99% of the time, and regret NOT trusting it the other 1%. I don't like this and I'm confused and questioning Bush for the first time regarding national security.
I could not tell . . . still cannot tell . . . whether or not sully777 had his tongue poking against his cheek.
I suggest you all visit the UAE in Abu Dabi and have the Prime Minister wine and dine you to allay your fears. Then you can tour the Dubai port facilities in your own personal convoy of Maybacks. You will see this port deal is good for the global economy and you will find Al Queda a whimsical farce.
Reads like satire to me. [I hope. :-) ]
>>>Or, just maybe instead of relying on propaganda statements from Al Qaeda, he knows the reality of the situation instead. It is amazing how suddenly 4 year old Al Qaeda propaganda is suddenly taken as the gospel truth.>>>
You really want to gamble on that with our national security? A GOVERNMENT OWNED COMPANY, a government that has been sympathetic and complacent in helping Al Queda attack us in the past will be in charge of knowing the ins and outs of our port security procedures, and we have this intellegence that says Al Queda are IN the government...
How sure are you that is it's propaganda with no truth to it?
Yawn. This will really make the Bush haters go nuts..
>>>Many foreign-owned companies are already running similar operations in the U.S., including Hutchison Whampoa.>>>
But how many of those foreign owned companies are owned by a government that had Al Queda money funneled through it?
Ok. So knowing the ins and outs of our security procedures is NO threat, or no potential threat?
I give an example. Someone steals from you. They apologize and are very very nice to you for a few years after stealing from you. So then are you going you going to let them housesit? I wouldn't.
Thanks for the ping.
I am slightly in favor of the deal.
Interesting discussion on both sides on this hot topic.
COSCO is a government owned company that has run our ports for years. Somehow, we have survived. The UAE did not help Al Qaeda attack us in the past anymore than Germany, Switzerland or even ourselves. Remember that every one of the terrorists involved in 9/11 were in this country legally and many received their flying training here. Should we ban trade with ourselves? And we have absolutely no intelligence that says Al Qaeda is in their government. What we have is a 4 year old Al Qaeda propaganda statement published by a group a terrorists furious that the UAE was being so helpful to the West (and especially the US) in fighting terrorism.
Sad but true.
Only if you take al Qaida's word for it.
But Tommy Franks said it was UAE who ratted out the Taliban in preparation for our operations in Afghanistan.
Little is known about the origins or authorship of the message. . . . but yet you'll abandon the President because of it.
Even that lamebrain Feinstein said she doubted the story about the danger to the west coast. Said she had no proof and that it was simply hyped by the President to create fear.
Almost 4 years later no sign of truth to the claim by Al Qaeda. Proof positive that UAE has flushed the system or found no AQers in the system. Additionaly, these papers also contain references to AQ operations in Iraq prior to US attack. You don't suppose the MSM will pick and choose what to believe based on their political leanings, do you?
You are being hysterical.
Cute cat!
Osam bin Laden builds day care centers Patty Murray (D WA)
Why would some organization tell another they infiltrated them? This sounds fishy to me.
I'm being principled.
Hysteria is not much of a principle; hysteria based on enemy agitprop, even less so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.