Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten


>Now first husband is not the same as being VP<

LOL. I think a female president's husband would be referred to as "First Gentleman", and BuBill is NO gentleman. But then, as the president's wife, HuHill was no lady either! (What am I laughing about? Please, Lord...)


83 posted on 03/03/2006 8:58:31 PM PST by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Paperdoll

I think a female president's husband would be referred to as "First Gentleman"
In Bill's case I think First Douche Bag would fit batter.


101 posted on 03/03/2006 9:20:19 PM PST by binkdeville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Paperdoll; 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Now first husband is not the same as being VP--2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
 
LOL. I think a female president's husband would be referred to as "First Gentleman", and BuBill is NO gentleman. But then, as the president's wife, HuHill was no lady either! (What am I laughing about? Please, Lord...)--Paperdoll

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."


 
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

 

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


154 posted on 03/04/2006 6:32:51 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson