Next Generation Cruise Missile Meets Warfighters' Needs

TransFormation DoD ^ | Staff Sgt. Ryan Hansen

[SandRat]

Next Generation Cruise Missile Meets Warfighters' Needs
One of the newest weapons in the Air Force's arsenal, the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile is truly an incredible piece of technology that gives the warfighter an affordable standoff cruise missile capable of taking out the enemy's air defenses early on in a conflict.
By Staff Sgt. Ryan Hansen / Air Armament Center Public Affairs
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla., March 9, 2006 – Since the late 1970s the Department of Defense has tried and failed numerous times to give the warfighter an affordable standoff cruise missile capable of taking out the enemy's air defenses early on in a conflict. Fast-forward to 2006 and that warfighter need has finally been met by the Air Force's next generation cruise missile – the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile. At 14 feet long and 2,250 pounds, this missile is an autonomous, conventional munition with a standoff range of more than 200 nautical miles. It is designed to defeat heavily defended, high-priority enemy targets deep behind enemy lines. It can be released in virtually any type of weather and uses its inertial navigation and global positioning systems to find its intended target and then its infrared seeker for pinpoint accuracy just before impact. Once in the air, the stealthy cruise missile can reach high subsonic speeds at .85 mach. It is also equipped with an anti-jammer that keeps the enemy in its crosshairs regardless of their technology or capabilities. One of the newest weapons in the Air Force's arsenal, the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile is truly an incredible piece of technology. Almost as incredible as the weapon itself is the journey that got it here. For years the warfighter has emphasized the need for an affordable standoff weapon they could use to attack high-priority targets from outside the enemy's air defenses. This weapon would give both fighter and bomber aircraft the ability to strike heavily defended and high-value targets in any weather and keep them out of harms way. The last program office to try and provide this capability was the Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile in 1986. But after eight years of development, the Secretary of Defense terminated the program because of problems with the weapon and escalating costs. However, the warfighter's need for the weapon still remained, so the Department of Defense went back to the drawing board. "The United States desperately needed a first-day-of-the-war stealthy cruise missile that could go in and take out those threats that put our manned platforms at risk," said Gerry Freisthler, director of the Air Armament Center Engineering and Acquisition Excellence Directorate. "We needed something to go in and take on those double digit (Surface-to-Air Missiles) that may be able to put our aircraft and aircrews at risk, and that's how the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile came about." Gerry Freisthler "We needed something to go in and take on those double digit (Surface-to-Air Missiles) that may be able to put our aircraft and aircrews at risk, and that's how the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile came about," he said. The newly christened the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile program office was charged with not only making a high survivability standoff weapon capable of attacking various types of targets, but also one made with speed and affordability in the acquisition world. They partnered with the Department of Defense, industry, and the warfighter to streamline many processes that were often timely and cumbersome before and they emphasized affordability at every juncture. "With the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile the most important things were (to be) on cost and on schedule," said Freisthler, who led the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile program from 2002 to 2004. "We gave the contractor a lot of flexibility with removal of (military) standards and (specifications) and from the beginning the program office had a very close relationship with Air Combat Command," he noted. Together this combined team set the framework for the much needed weapon and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile started taking baby steps on its way to the warfighter. Even though the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile program office had set a solid foundation for their weapon and knew what pitfalls to avoid, that didn't mean the road to handing the weapon to the warfighter would be easy or without struggles. The weapon began engineering and manufacturing development in 1997 and entered Low Rate Initial Production just four years later in 2001. Then the next important step for the missile came in July 2004 when it reached Full Rate Production. However, even as it continued to hit milestones some challenges remained. "Achieving demonstrated in-flight reliability turned out to be our biggest challenge in the transition from development to full rate production," said Colonel Jim Geurts, who manages the program as the Long Range Missile Systems Group commander. "To address these challenges, we pulled together the experts from across industry and the Department of Defense to review our plans and give us feedback to ensure we could achieve the type of reliability growth needed as we began fielding large numbers of assets in the field," he said.	A Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile is tested in 2005 at White Sands Missile Range, N.M. The missile is an autonomous, conventional munition with a standoff range of more than 200 nautical miles that is designed to defeat heavily defended, high priority enemy targets deep behind enemy lines. It is part of the Long Range Missile Systems Group here at Eglin and is one of the newest weapons in the Air Force arsenal. The commander of Air Combat Command declared the weapon Initial Operational Capability on the B-52 and B-1 in 2005. Courtesy photos Their hard work paid off and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile team went back to prove the weapon could deliver on its promise. During flight tests in 2005 the weapon scored nine successes in 11 tests, followed by two more successful flights already in 2006. On the heels of those successes, the weapon finished the year strong reaching initial operational capability on the B-52 and B-1. More than 350 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles have been delivered and are in the hands of the warfighter and ready for combat use around the world if called upon. "The Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile weapon system continues to demonstrate high reliability in flight and ground testing," said Maj. Gen. Jack Catton, director of requirements for Air Combat Command. "More and more units are gaining the capability to effectively employ the weapon system." While the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile can already do some mouth-watering things, the Long Range Missile Systems Group has plans to make it even more lethal.  The second phase of the program is to make an extended range version of the weapon. It will increase the standoff capability to more than 500 nautical miles. The weapon, which looks exactly the same as the original from the outside, has a new engine and can carry more fuel. It will first be integrated on the B-1B and will be ready for flight testing later this Spring. "The extended range version will have the same lethality and stealth as the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, but it will deliver that knock-out punch from more than twice as far away," said Lt. Col. Stephen Davis, Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile Block 2 Squadron commander. "In the simplest terms, this means some child's mom or dad won't have to fly their B-1 through enemy threats to strike many deeply placed targets," he said. But additional stand-off range isn't the only thing they are improving. The Long Range Missile Systems Group is also adding a weapons data link that will enable key command and control elements to communicate with the weapon after it's already in flight. "The data link will plug the weapon right into the warfighting network," said Michele Brazel, Long Range Missile Systems Group deputy director. "They'll be able to track what each missile is doing in flight, retarget it in flight if need be, and then get a good indication of whether or not it destroyed its target." Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile is also scheduled to be one of the first weapons to be Universal Armament Interface compliant. This interface is a joint initiative that will allow the Air Force to incorporate new precision-guided munitions onto its aircraft without requiring major changes to each aircraft's software. New development activity is also planned to enable the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile to enhance its maritime engagement capability and become the air-launched weapon of choice not only for highly defended fixed and relocatable land targets, but moving maritime targets as well. And recently the Australian Defense Force selected the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile to be its long range air-to-surface missile for their F/A-18 Hornet fleet. As it stands right now the Air Force currently plans to buy 2,400 the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles and 2,500 of its extended range version with production extending through 2018. But regardless of the numbers, the warfighter is very pleased to finally have the capability in its arsenal.

[SandRat]

New Cruise Missile brings bad guys a BIG BOOM!

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I'm (unfortunately) far more impressed by and I believe rightfully concerned about the Russian "Sunburn" cruise missile. Primarily oriented as an anti-ship weapon. Some numbers of which are in the hands of the Chinese and the Iranians (guarding the Sts of Hormuz) Google "sunburn missile" for more info. I'm not aware of any effective defense the US Navy has against this item; That doesn't mean we don't, just I'm unaware of any.

[Last Dakotan]

"In the simplest terms, this means some child's mom or dad won't have to fly their B-1 through enemy threats to strike many deeply placed targets," he said.

I wanna puke.

[A.A. Cunningham]

In case you need to hurl again:

Vance Couple Selected to Pilot B-2s

[JoeFromSidney]

"We gave the contractor a lot of flexibility with removal of (military) standards and (specifications) and from the beginning the program office had a very close relationship with Air Combat Command," he noted.

snip

"Achieving demonstrated in-flight reliability turned out to be our biggest challenge in the transition from development to full rate production," said Colonel Jim Geurts, who manages the program as the Long Range Missile Systems Group commander.

I'm glad to know they finally got the thing working right, but given the first of these two excerpts, I could have predicted the second. People like to complain about military specifications and standards ("An elephant is a mouse built to Mil Spec"), but there are reasons the specs and standards exist.

One is to avoid repeating mistakes. As one of my supervisors once told me, "Mil Specs are a record of every mistake we ever made." Mistakes like putting dissimilar metals together, so you get electrogalvanic corrosion in the presence of moisture.

Another is to assure that reliable parts are designed into a piece of equipment from the start. The Army once fielded a radio that had electrolytic capacitors that used sulfuric acid as an electrolyte. It has a high dielectric constant, so you can make the capacitor a lot smaller. But when it eventually leaks, it ruins everything around it. It took us years to get those things out of the supply system.

Yet another is to assure that once a piece of equipment is fielded, the necessary parts are in the supply chain. During Vietnam, some Pentagon weenie decided that we didn't need to Mil Spec gasoline-powered electric generators. Just buy commercial units "off the shelf" and ship them to Vietnam. So they did. And once they were in Vietnam, when a spark plug failed, or a carbureter float sprang a leak, or a throttle spring broke, there were no replacements in the supply system. An otherwise-okay generator had to be tossed out and replaced for lack of spare parts.

I just hope that this missile works out as they want, or it will be another failure in a long line of failures.

[TheHound]

I'm sure She will defend your right to do so.

[ASOC]

Thanks for the post -

Story about the PRC-104 (a portable HF commo unit)

At an air show, a civilian asked why we got 'ripped off' as the unit cost 5 grand a pop.

My answer - "Its worth it and then some - this radio can cold soak at -40 for 2 full days, and I know if I need to call for beans or bullets, it is on frequency, it works. So my life is worth 5 grand, ya".

Is mil-spec always the best, maybe not, but the stuff I used I could mostly count on to work in the extreme conditions where we worked. If it didn't work, it was because iot was broke hard.