Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. panel says voters don't have to prove citizenship (Decision counter to state's Prop. 200)
Arizona Daily Star ^ | C.J. Karamargin

Posted on 03/11/2006 10:56:57 AM PST by SandRat

PHOENIX ¡ª State election officials are scrambling to interpret a ruling that Arizonans do not need to show proof of citizenship when they register to vote with a federal registration form.

Issued Monday by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, the ruling amounts to a potential loophole in Proposition 200, the voter-approved initiative that made Arizona the first state in the nation to require proof of citizenship for voter registration.

The ruling says "Arizona may not refuse to register individuals to vote in a federal election for failing to provide supplemental proof of citizenship," as required under Prop. 200.

In a three-page letter to Secretary of State Jan Brewer, the commission's executive director wrote that imposing additional citizenship requirements on anyone using a federal registration form could result in a loss of voting rights.

"No state may condition acceptance of the federal form upon receipt of additional proof" of citizenship, wrote Thomas R. Wilkey.

Brewer ¡ª whose office asked the commission for its opinion in December ¡ª called the ruling "outlandish" and has asked for a review by Attorney General Terry Goddard.

"I certainly have concerns about this," she said. "I don't believe they're correct."

Prop. 200 was approved overwhelmingly by Arizona voters in November 2004 and survived numerous legal challenges before it passed muster with the U.S. Department of Justice in January 2005.

"It seems pretty clear," Brewer said. "It's the law in Arizona."

The proposition requires county election officials to reject any voter registration form that is not accompanied by "satisfactory evidence of United States citizenship," such as a birth certificate, passport, tribal ID card or an Arizona driver's license issued after Oct. 1, 1996, when proof of legal residency for licenses became necessary.

It also requires voters to show a photo ID or two other forms of identification, such as a utility bill or bank statement, to get a ballot.

The federal registration form, which was created and is regulated by the commission, requires only that a voter attest to being a citizen. They are available on the commission's Web site, www.eac.gov.

Because states must accept the federal form, Pima County Registrar of Voters Chris Roads said the divergent requirements could create "an interesting scenario" on Election Day: A voter who registers with a federal form could be allowed to cast a ballot in a federal race, such as president or Congress, but not in a state or local race.

"It could create another layer of eligibility," he said.

But, Roads added, very few voters register with a federal form. Between November 2002 and November 2004, the county processed 338,574 registration forms and only 3,579, or just about 1 percent, were federal. "It's not a big loophole," he said.

Whether it will become one, however, is unclear. Randy Pullen, chairman of the Yes on 200 Committee, said he is not too worried.

"I'm pretty confident that if the Department of Justice has cleared it, there is no issue," he said.

Andrea Esquer, spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office, said late Friday that the matter is still under review but Prop. 200 will be enforced.

¡ñ Contact reporter C.J. Karamargin at 909-8482 or at ckaramargin@azstarnet.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 200; aliens; citizenship; counter; decision; dont; have; immigration; panel; prop; prove; runs; states; us; voterfraud; voters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2006 10:57:04 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Crazy.


2 posted on 03/11/2006 11:00:21 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Do they even have to prove they're alive?


3 posted on 03/11/2006 11:01:27 AM PST by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy
Do they even have to prove they're alive?

Not if you register great-grandma as a Democrat.

4 posted on 03/11/2006 11:02:44 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Just what Arizona needs: illegal aliens voting.


5 posted on 03/11/2006 11:02:48 AM PST by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Bastards found a loophole. Damn them.


6 posted on 03/11/2006 11:03:57 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy
Not in "Butch" NapaitRENO's feeble Democ mind.
7 posted on 03/11/2006 11:05:06 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Because each state is required to individually certify its own vote totals according to its own eligibility requirements (subject to past Constitutional and Supreme Court rulings), I don't personally see that this Federal commission has any jurisdiction here. Of course that's me speaking as an average Joe.

So Arizone, do you wanna assert your rights as a state or not? It would be an interesting test case, IMHO. If I'm the state, though, I might start by arguing that even the Federal guideline cited above believes that citizenship is important (and, duh, the law). Therefore, the state is merely putting some teeth into the commision's own rule.

8 posted on 03/11/2006 11:06:30 AM PST by alancarp (NASCAR: Always turning left, but can never keep up with the Liber-commis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

In other words, you don't have to be a citizen to vote in a federal election. How does our government benefit by having non citizens voting in federal elections?


9 posted on 03/11/2006 11:11:13 AM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

" requires only that a voter attest to being a citizen"

Arrest, try, convict, and imprison any illegal caught "attesting to being a citizen" of perjury and it will stop immediatly.


10 posted on 03/11/2006 11:12:05 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
And of course the members of this outstandinglandish panel were elected by huge majorities of the legal citizens of Arizona, right? /sarcasm
11 posted on 03/11/2006 11:12:28 AM PST by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

"How does our government benefit by having non citizens voting in federal elections?"

The gove3rnment doesn't but the democraps do and the taxpayers take it in the shorts again supporting the welfare state.


12 posted on 03/11/2006 11:14:23 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Who the hell is this commission? What are their credentials?

13 posted on 03/11/2006 11:14:58 AM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
What is the point of these propositions? seems like the states never follow them, CA and the gay stuff now this
14 posted on 03/11/2006 11:15:52 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy

Do they even have to prove they're alive?

Republicans do!

Democrats don't!


15 posted on 03/11/2006 11:23:39 AM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This kind of nonsense would stop if we could just get the Republicans back in power.

Oh wait...


16 posted on 03/11/2006 11:28:01 AM PST by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
We are on the road to perdition, or if you like another term better, NewWorldOrder, (a phrase I remember GHWB using some years ago). Our ability to remain the USofA and remaining sovereign is going straight to hell, and there is not one person among our "elected" officials who will or can put a stop to it.

I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see.

FMCDH(BITS)

17 posted on 03/11/2006 11:30:13 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
the taxpayers take it in the shorts again supporting the welfare state.

Yeah, and government employee unions benefit by adding more government workers to hand out taxpayer money.
.
18 posted on 03/11/2006 11:32:45 AM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
I will not silently give away what my family fought for for 230 years..........

Anyone voting who is not a citizen needs to be taken no questions asked and stood up against a wall and shot!!!

19 posted on 03/11/2006 11:34:02 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson