Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/11/2006 1:12:22 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RWR8189

LOL! THEY HAVE TO!

they have NO MONEY!

they need it ALL for the Primaries!

Soros et al.. has all the MOOOOLAH!

LOL! I LOVE THEIR STUPIDITY!


2 posted on 03/11/2006 1:13:49 PM PST by eeevil conservative (I am not flirting......I am not flirting.......honest, I am not flirting......ok..I AM flirting.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I hope they pick Georgia. I can vote in the dem primary.


3 posted on 03/11/2006 1:14:04 PM PST by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I'm no longer worried about the Democrats winning the next Presidency or taking control of the House.


4 posted on 03/11/2006 1:14:08 PM PST by tdewey10 (It's time for the party to return to the principles of President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

I'm all for ending the stranglehold that Iowa and NH have on the process.

As a step in that process I give a thumbs up to this plan.


5 posted on 03/11/2006 1:17:19 PM PST by WillRain ("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Alexis Herman, co-chair of the committee, was Clinton's Labor Secretary.

I wonder if Hillary's worried about not winning Iowa or New Hamshire?


6 posted on 03/11/2006 1:18:19 PM PST by guinnessman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Democrats say, "Not enough dead people vote in New Hampshire."


7 posted on 03/11/2006 1:18:55 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
..a plan that would shake up their presidential selection process by placing racially diverse states early in the voting.

My guess is that the State of Baja California would be The Former Twelfth Lady's first choice.

10 posted on 03/11/2006 1:32:46 PM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

How starting things off with a Washington DC caucus? Jesse and Sharpton would love that. Heck, maybe Cynthia McKinney could be the frontrunner.


12 posted on 03/11/2006 1:46:29 PM PST by The Fop (Marxism was built for the West but the West rejected it, and hell hath no fury like a woman scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Wasn't it McAwful who was all over TV saying that "early primaries" did them in in 2000, 2002, 2004 - and they're still going to do it.

This kind of stupidity is mind-boggling!


14 posted on 03/11/2006 2:39:00 PM PST by CyberAnt (Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
If Donna Brazile doesn't like waiting, why don't they have their primaries in 2007? Why wait until 2008?

The primaries were too early in the year already--now they're planning to make a bad schedule even worse.

In practice in recent elections the candidates are usually thinned out in a matter of a few weeks, and the nominee-to-be is clear about April, so there's about seven months before the general election. That's an awfully long time and may be part of the reason for the increasing partisanship and polarization in our country, and for people to get fed up with politics altogether.

17 posted on 03/11/2006 3:53:27 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Alexis Herman, just another Clinton era crook.
http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/09/08/herman/


19 posted on 03/11/2006 7:41:35 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

And before that, there was this...
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_n4_v29/ai_19279945/pg_3


20 posted on 03/11/2006 7:51:04 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Check it out everyone- ABC has a similar story, but check out the first paragragh-

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1715491&page=1

"The Democratic Party doesn't know exactly how it is going to change its presidential nominating process. But after Saturday's meeting of the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, the party has agreed, at least in principle, on what it is seeking: It is looking for states with lots of Hispanics, African-Americans, and union members that are not too big and that are not in the Midwest or Northeast."

So does anyone know of a small state, not in the Midwest or Northeast, that is full of only Hispanics, African-Americans and union members only????????

23 posted on 03/12/2006 6:39:23 PM PST by KCRW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson