Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WASH POST's Ben Bradlee Claims Plame Leaker Was Richard Armitage
The Drudge Report ^ | march 13, 2006 | Drudge

Posted on 03/13/2006 8:02:26 AM PST by blogblogginaway

WASH POST's Ben Bradlee Claims Plame Leaker Was Richard Armitage Mon Mar 13 2006 10:48:34 ET

THE WASHINGTON POST's famous Watergate editor Ben Bradlee claims that it was former State Department Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage who was the individual who leaked the identity of CIA official Valerie Plame.

In the latest issue of VANITY FAIR: "Woodward was in a tricky position. People close to him believe that he had learned about Plame from his friend Richard Armitage, Colin Powell's former deputy, who has been known to be critical of the administration and who has a blunt way of speaking. 'That Armitage is the likely source is a fair assumption,' former WASHINGTON POST editor Ben Bradlee said."

'I had heard about an e-mail that was sent that had a lot of unprintable language in it.'"

Developing...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armitage; benbradlee; bradlee; cialeak; libby; plame; plamenameblamegame; richardarmitage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: blogblogginaway
Notice the weasel word, 'likely'.......and 'people believe'

FACTS or shut up.

41 posted on 03/13/2006 8:56:53 AM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Powell's a victim of The Peter Principle. His public career should have ended with the premature endind of the first Gulf War.

Or more percisely, when the results of the premature ending came to fruition.

42 posted on 03/13/2006 8:59:03 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

When the REAL truth starts coming out, watch this story go poof! How can Patrick Fitzgerald be anything short of an incompetent boob? Common sense says you first produce rock-solid evidence that Plame was undercover or you have NO CRIME. Not only has Fitzgerald not done this, but he seems to think it won't even be an issue. He's banking on a plea agreement that he will never get.


43 posted on 03/13/2006 9:07:14 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
The question is, if true, why hasn't Armitage come forward? Why didn't he come forward in the beginning?"

Because maybe there was something bigger going on?

Maybe Armitage (and Powell, and Tenet, and "others") had designs that had all to do with embarrassing the White House, generally, and Bush, specifically?

It's no secret that the tensions between the various "camps" within the administration. The "Cheney camp", the "Powell camp", the "Rumsfeld camp", blah, blah. The "eeeevil neo cons" vs. the "doves".

Unfortunately, our game should be focused on 1 thing: kill our enemies.

Unfortunately, our real enemies are here at home.

They are the liberals that run around deconstructing our society at every chance they get. They are the willing accomplices in the press. They are the illegal aliens that are rotting this country from the inside out. They are those that indulge in the social malaise and suckle off of the government teat and continue to pump more children out by the truckload.

Yeah, we need to kill the sons-a-bitches that would seek mass destruction on our societies, but it might be a good idea to address these other issues first.

Instead, we get some BS political games between different "camps". It's a friggin' joke.

44 posted on 03/13/2006 9:14:27 AM PST by mattdono (The New 'Rat math: 0.0000017% = Vast Wiretapping of "Americans" Riiiggghhhhtttt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra
Will Woodward and Bernstein NEVER go away?.

No, because the true beat journalist is gone, replaced in the budding journalist's pantheon by The Op-Ed Writer. They'd rather thrust their deeply-held beliefs in front of a captive audience than report on the ACTIONS of others.

45 posted on 03/13/2006 9:16:23 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
"Maybe Armitage (and Powell, and Tenet, and "others") had designs that had all to do with embarrassing the White House, generally, and Bush, specifically?"

I don't think there is any doubt that Armitage would like to embarrass the President... but how would outing Plame do that - How would he have guessed that Libby would allegedly lie in the investigation?
46 posted on 03/13/2006 9:17:23 AM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

This is not really news. That was a foregone conclusion when Woodward came forward. All one had to do was to read Woodward's book to know this. Armitage is, as was stated, a blunt speaker. And he and Powell were joined at the hip anyway.

But he is in no legal jeopardy because Plame was not a covert agent. A "non-story" story.


47 posted on 03/13/2006 9:25:42 AM PST by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

The WaPo's possibly famous Watergate editor and possible journalist Ben Bradlee claims that it was former State Department Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage who was the individual who leaked the identity of CIA official Valerie Plame.

The whole point is that Valerie was supposed to be NONofficial. WaPo hasn't got a clue.


48 posted on 03/13/2006 9:26:48 AM PST by MilleniumBug (Pattycake, Pattycake, Wilson's the man...Bake me a yellowboy fast as you can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Ben Bradlee is a senile old fart who's trying to recapture the glory days of Watergate.


49 posted on 03/13/2006 9:27:15 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

I still say it was Rove in a rubber mask. Like the one he used for Osama...


50 posted on 03/13/2006 9:28:00 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Powell gone, Armitage gone, makes sense to me. I never thought for a second this Administration hadn't already knew who the main player was.
Armitage turned in his resignation the day after Powell on Nov. 16th.
51 posted on 03/13/2006 9:44:54 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
That won't work for 'The Spitter'... he needs Cheney. Scratch this one from the intro-story on Hardbowel tonight... Chrissy will run with the Feingold censuring motion.
52 posted on 03/13/2006 9:53:16 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I forgot, the MSM will jump to the next "controversy" and beat that dead horse some more. Did you hear about Nixon and Watergate?


53 posted on 03/13/2006 9:57:35 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Straight8

Lets be honest. Just put a couple of teenagers out at the CIA headquarters for six months...collect license plate numbers and I can publish a document with every single CIA member on it. These idiots park just like every other government worker...in the big parking lot outside of their complex.


54 posted on 03/13/2006 10:21:02 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Well, well, well, isn't this a fine how-do-you-do...

Getting snacks ready..


55 posted on 03/13/2006 10:22:52 AM PST by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I knew I was gonna do that sooner or later! :-)

That's not the worst typo that you could have made.

56 posted on 03/13/2006 10:26:30 AM PST by dinasour (Pajamahadeen and member of the Head SnowFlake Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Sorry, but there's a big diffence between now and then, as far as Bradless's role.

Yes, my comparison was very superficial. No question, I'm guilty. And, yes, Bradlee is no longer managing editor (I think that was his position during Woodstein-days). But it is interesting that his "jounalistic ethics" -- that's the currency in which he deals -- only go so far. I'm sure Old Ben still considers himself a jounalist.

57 posted on 03/13/2006 10:45:32 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
How would he have guessed that Libby would allegedly lie in the investigation? He wouldn't have. And, by all means, I doubt that Libby would have been the target of such plans.

They were after the President and, most likely, Rove. That Libby allegedly lied to during the investigation is only a consequence of the investigation itself, not the subject matter it was investigating.

how would outing Plame do that

Well, if I knew that, I wouldn't be posting this note right now. I would probably be pulling some strings and banking a lot more cash.

Look, bottom line is: this type of thing is a game to these people and I don't think that this is what our country is supposed to be about.

And, I know, there has always been and always will be this kind of BS in a political process, but that comment never makes it anymore palatable for me.

58 posted on 03/13/2006 10:53:47 AM PST by mattdono (The New 'Rat math: 0.0000017% = Vast Wiretapping of "Americans" Riiiggghhhhtttt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

FYI

Is this an orchestrated subject of the day??


59 posted on 03/13/2006 10:56:54 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

The story may be old and stale, but it's still extremely important, because it's plum at the center of the rogue element in the CIA, the manipulators of news at such major sources as the New York Times and Washington Post, the DNC, and the traitors on the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Jay Rockefeller. Plus, as this current story suggests, the State Department.

It's a golden opportunity to expose some of this treasonous trash to the light of day, and the news media can't complain, because they were the ones who pushed it. I want to see more reporters and leakers doing jail time, and this is one of the keys to accomplishing that.


60 posted on 03/13/2006 11:01:38 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson