Posted on 03/15/2006 12:09:57 PM PST by nuconvert
U.S. Confirms Thwarted Al Qaeda Attack on Green Zone
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Testifying on Capitol Hill today, General John Abizaid said claims by Iraq's Interior Ministry that Al Qaeda terrorists tried to storm the highly secured Green Zone in Baghdad where the U.S. and British embassies are located were true.
Abizaid was asked about the reported plot that allegedly involved more than 400 Al Qaeda operatives infiltrating Iraqi Security Forces and taking over guard posts around the Green Zone which is also the seat of the Iraqi government.
"I think you can look at it that it's a good thing we found out about it before it moved forward and with a good deal of concern that people are trying to infiltrate the national security forces and various branches of the government," he said.
"As sectarian tensions increase, it becomes harder to hold things together. I am confident we can move in a positive direction and the security forces will stay loyal," he added.
Tuesday the interior minister of Iraq had said authorities had foiled the plot that would have put hundreds of its men at critical guard posts around the Green Zone.
A senior Defense Ministry official said the 421 Al Qaeda fighters were actually recruited to storm the U.S. and British embassies and take hostages. Several ranking Defense Ministry officials were jailed in the plot, the official said on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Sorry, but that was not what got my attention. There is more than one sentence there.
For a time, I was inclined to agree. However the result would not be peace. The Sunni and Shia states would become proxy/client states of Syria and Iran respectively. That would doom any Christian state, and the Kurdish state would find itself surrounded by hostiles. Kurdish minorities in Iran and Turkey are at odds with those governments, which do not want an independent Kurdish state on their borders that would fan the flames of sepratism within their own borders.
The CFR solution would result in chaos, in my opinion. Nationalism, not Balkanism, will save iraq. But, if nationalism is unable to trump factions and tribes (which may be the case), the result is the same, either way.
How the bad guys can win.
It is a scenario reminiscent of the Trojan Horse. Iraq’s Interior Minister Bayan Jabr revealed that Iraqi internal security had broken up a plot to place 421 al Qaeda fighters as guards controlling access to Baghdad’s International or “Green” Zone. Once in position, the terrorists planned to storm the U.S. and British embassies, take hostages, and wreak havoc. They were “one bureaucrat’s signature away” from implementing the plan when it was uncovered. Imagine if the aforementioned pen pusher had been more Type A? Luckily, the wheels of Iraq’s bureaucracy move as slowly as our own.
This is one of the most dangerous terrorist plots in recent memory, one that had a chance of making a strategic impact. A surprise attack by 400 fanatics (or likely more when including the fighters in disguise they would have admitted to the zone just prior to the attack) could not help but generate mayhem. They might have taken some hostages, potentially high-ranking individuals. Of course, the counterattack would be instantaneous and overwhelming, and few of the enemy would survive. Nevertheless, by then they would have achieved their objective; not to defeat Coalition forces, but to seize and hold the only ground they can command, the attention of the global mass media.
Imagine news coverage of al Qaeda fighters in the American embassy. The story line would be irresistible — Tet Offensive, the Sequel. The press is already fixated on comparing the Iraq war to Vietnam, despite the numerous and significant differences. An attack like this, a surprise urban guerilla assault on a key symbol of American power, would immediately be cast as a replay of the January 31, 1968, Viet Cong attack on the U.S. embassy in Saigon.
Then, 19 VC sappers blew a hole in the wall surrounding the embassy grounds and shot down the guards inside the gate. A sharp firefight ensued, and enemy forces failed to occupy the embassy proper; but early erroneous reports, relayed by Asoociated Press reporter Peter Arnett, credited the VC with taking the first floor of the building. Moreover, while the attackers had been either killed or captured within hours of the assault, film of the attack ran and reran on network news programs, giving the impression of a much more significant action. Furthermore, the press quickly credited the enemy with a “psychological victory,” even though they had failed even to come close to meeting their military objectives. In this respect, the Embassy attack was a microcosm of the entire Tet Offensive.
The current crop of terrorists well understand the Tet dynamic. Al Qaeda has frequently made mention of Vietnam as a model for the type of victory they are seeking, a blow to the American will that results in demoralization at home and withdrawal of the troops. In the same vein, they also make mention of Mogadishu 1993 and Beirut 1983. Prussian military theorist Karl von Clausewitz famously posited a “trinity” essential for the successful prosecution of war — synchronization between three necessary elements; the fighting forces, the political leadership, and the national will. The terrorists realize they cannot defeat our military, nor sway our (current) leaders, so they seek to strike at our only vulnerability, our national commitment to continue to prosecute the struggle.
Osama bin Laden once wrote, “It is obvious that the media war in this century is one of the strongest methods; in fact, its share may reach 90 percent of the total preparation for battles.” Reporters, who seek to package stories using preexistent themes in order to give instant (and often erroneous) context to events, are particularly susceptible to terrorist manipulation. Even a VC-sized attack on the Baghdad embassy would be sufficient to engage the Tet analogy, particularly if the terrorists coupled it with a media campaign that explicitly made the comparison. Given the already softening public support for the war effort, an upcoming midterm election, and a wounded White House, the political impact would be far out of proportion to the purely military significance of the action. But of course that is the outcome that terrorists usually seek.
We are fortunate that the Iraqis were able to break up this plot before it was executed. However, it demonstrates that the terrorists have correctly diagnosed what they must do to make their attacks strategically significant. We may not be so lucky next time. An embassy assault would be perfect fodder for the press. The story writes itself. And it does not have a happy ending.
I agree Marine_Uncle.
Youch! Thank God this cabal was caught before they could position their forces...it would have been a blood-bath...and would have quintupled the calls to pull-out.
The fact that it was foiled is indeed very encouraging.
Let us hope our agreement is founded in the realities.
The interesting part is: how many of these 400+ excremists were scooped up?
I agree. All this MSM wishful thinking about civil war actually shows al Qaeda has run out of options.
They can't win, so they're trying to trash the place.
Cause we have principals....
The house next to me is a rental. A bunch of white trash rented it. The landlord evicted them. They tore it up before they left...$15,000 in damage.
The neighbors said it was his fault, since he rented to them in the first place. Some said they wouldn't have trashed it if he hadn't evicted them.
That kind of twisted logic sounds familiar, doesn't it?
So what do you recommend for this country?
That is scary!
ping
I'll presume you're an Iraqi, since you used the term "we" and it's the Iraqis handling Saddam Hussein within their own judicial system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.