Stop the Election Day cheating -- or it will spread further (DUmmie Sources Cited)

Miami Herald ^ | March 15, 2006 | ROBERT STEINBACK

[M Kehoe]

I think that Fitrakis and Steinback should research all of the allegations, and anomalies. And since I'm such a nice guy, I will give them some additional locations:

Madison, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, West Palm Beach, and of course everyone's favorite...

Chicago.

5.56mm

[jmaroneps37]

This is very interesting especially since David Kidwell a reporter for the Miami Herald wrote a series of articles about voter fraud in Florida. The first article appeared on Nov. 20, 2000. His series found that 965 felons had voted in the state of Florida. Each was illegal. statistically
820 of them voted Democrat. That means algore got a 675 vote advantage from voter fraud that we know of.

The "statistical anomalies" this guy cite are a bunch of crap. Maybe someone should take this rat fool aside and explain the Bell Curve and the randomness of the real world. To point to two precincts that reported more votes than registered voters is meaningless. In 2000 there were election districts in Philladelphia that reported more votes than RESIDENTS. The same thing happened in the whole western half of Washington State.

This guy, like some many rats, just can't accept that the dogs DON'T LIKE THE FOOD.

[Aeronaut]

Why are the Dems so deathly afraid of photo ID? I like the purple ink option personally.

[dirtbiker]

Four percent of the 5.6 million votes cast in Ohio -- some 224,000 ballots -- were not counted for various reasons.

How many of those 224,000 were spoiled or marked wrong, which would render them VOID and useless, like the INSTRUCTIONS say....

Nearly two-thirds of those disallowed votes came from urban, heavily Democratic districts.

Dems is stupid....'nuff said....

In certain heavily Republican counties, John Kerry received fewer votes than obscure Democrats running in statewide elections. In Butler County, for example, a retired black judge from Cleveland in a long-shot race for state Supreme Court got 61,000 votes. Kerry got 54,000.

The first 5 words spell it all out: In certain heavily Republican counties.Why would a Republican vote for Lurch?

For someone with a PhD, he sure is STOOPID!

[fwdude]

Check out John Fund's book, Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy for a rational, eye-opening view on election fraud. IMHO, 2000 and 2004 would have been a landslide for Bush if much of the fraud could have been quashed.

[randita]

Empirical evidence, which is all that is evident in this article, proves nothing.

In certain heavily Republican counties, John Kerry received fewer votes than obscure Democrats running in statewide elections. In Butler County, for example, a retired black judge from Cleveland in a long-shot race for state Supreme Court got 61,000 votes. Kerry got 54,000.

So what. People split tickets all the time. But Democrats think people are too stupid to vote for the individual instead of just mind-numbingly pulling the D lever.

Voter turnout in two precincts exceeded 100 percent of the voters yet, ''In a couple of hours, we were able to find 25 people who said they didn't vote or were out of town,'' Fitrakis said.

So what. Were those 25 people registered to vote and if so, registered to vote in that town?

Flimsy arguments - all of them. Writer deserves an F.

[Ronaldus Magnus Reagan]

In 2000 there were election districts in Philladelphia that reported more votes than RESIDENTS.

I'm from Philadelphia and that is true. In fact, in heavily Democrat districts, the polling places are in places such as hair salons and even private homes!

[Ronaldus Magnus Reagan]

In fact, our Pennsylvania Governor, Fast Eddie Rendell, promises to veto a photo ID requirement for voting..

snip...

"Rendell promises veto on voter ID bill

By David M. Brown TRIBUNE-REVIEW Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Saying his intent is to protect voting rights, Gov. Ed Rendell vowed Monday in Pittsburgh to veto legislation that would require voters to show identification at the polls.

The announcement wasn't a surprise. Rendell, a Democrat from Philadelphia, had hinted for days that he plans to veto the measure passed last week along partisan lines by the Republican-controlled Legislature.

"At a time in our nation's history when voting is becoming ... less and less prevalent among our people, we should be doing everything in our power to make it easier to vote -- not to make it harder," Rendell said at an event in the Hill District.

[Balding_Eagle]

Is this the Professor whining?

"AP Lifts from the small press again and won't correct"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x671012

[lepton]

Nearly two-thirds of those disallowed votes came from urban, heavily Democratic districts.

Generally, when you look at the details, it appears that what is being suggested is that Democrats blocked Democrats from voting.

[randita]

At a time in our nation's history when voting is becoming ... less and less prevalent among our people, we should be doing everything in our power to make it easier to vote -- not to make it harder," Rendell said at an event in the Hill District.

Good, this will play right into Swannie's hand as anyone with half a brain won't object to the concept that you have to identify yourself before you can vote.