Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China in Midst of Huge Military Build Up
Sierra Times ^ | 3/17/2006 | Jim Kouri, CPP

Posted on 03/17/2006 7:59:39 AM PST by FerdieMurphy

While the news media and politicians in the United States continue their focus on the Dubai Ports World deal or censuring President George W. Bush or Hillary Clinton, there are enormous changes occurring in communist China.

For the most part, the news media and pundits have ignored events in China for over a decade.

Even when President Bill Clinton allowed dual-purpose technology transfers to the Chinese, few realized the significance of those transfers, and little was reported in the US media. Some of that US technology helped the Chinese government in perfecting the accuracy of their Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs).

Now many are ignoring the fact that China boasts it will increase its military spending by 14.7% this year. Of course, an official from China's parliament quickly told US and European Union military analysts that much of the increase would be used to cover fuel and salaries and that China was a "peace-loving nation".

Jiang Enzhu, a member of parliament, told the British Broadcasting Company that the US spent a greater proportion of its economy on defense and that China had "no intention of vigorously developing armaments".

However, American intelligence sources have at various times accused China of understating its military budget and weapons programs.

It's been widely accepted that China's armed forces are the biggest in the world and has undergone double-digit increases in military spending since the early 1990s. The increases have caused fear by their immediate neighbors Japan and Taiwan. The US has also expressed concerns over the spending on the 2.5 million strong military. Washington has several times accused China of understating its military budget.

But the Chinese government claims its spending is in line with military budgets in other governments. China's defense budget has climbed in recent years along with the success of its economy.

China also claims its military spending is insignificant when compared with the United States. According to Pentagon figures the US had a base military budget of $400 billion in last year.

Japan is also developing new torpedos to boost the defense of its islands, including some claimed by China. The Japanese fear the Chinese may try to take over the disputed islands.

Part of the efforts to strengthen its ability to defend remote islands against Chinese attack entails the Japanese sending some 125 ground troops to San Diego, California from January 9-27 for advanced training with the US Marines, the Nihon Keizai newspaper said.

The troops will take part in reconnaissance training such as learning how to land on potentially-occupied remote islands and gather information, the paper said.

The aim is to strengthen Japan's ability to defend remote southern isles such as the disputed islands known as the Diaoyus in China and the Senkakus in Japan, the newspaper said.

Wang Xinjun, a military analyst, told the Chinese media that the US is playing up China's military power in order to contain China's military development. He says that the Pentagon seeks to strengthen US forces in the Asia Pacific area, in order to offset China's influence in the region.

Meanwhile, the left-wing in the US believe this is a means by which the Pentagon may garner more funding for military weapons and technology. As usual, the liberal-left in the US sees no threat to national security, preferring to hamper any military spending as they did during the Cold War.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; china; chinesemilitary; cosco; military; ports; walmartistheirfriend; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
Even when President Bill Clinton allowed dual-purpose technology transfers to the Chinese, few realized the significance of those transfers, and little was reported in the US media.

Billy Goat was awarded the Red Star by his commie Chinese pals for this treason!

China may be deciding to strike while the iron is hot.

1 posted on 03/17/2006 7:59:40 AM PST by FerdieMurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
IMHO, China is going to take Taiwan
They may wait until we step into Iran, but they are going to take it by force.
2 posted on 03/17/2006 8:01:34 AM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Acutally there's nothing to fear here. China is now a free capitalist system. Fifteen years of open trade with China has completely changed it's nature... /s

Just ask the Neville Chamberlain devotes on this forum.

Just like I've been saying for around 13 years now, our boys will die fighting a nation whose military build-up was financed almost exclusively by our insane trade policies.

How I loathe those who fought to make this so.


3 posted on 03/17/2006 8:06:51 AM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

Agree.


4 posted on 03/17/2006 8:15:34 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
And besides, o Doughty One, we have allowed them to operate our port terminals on our Left coast.

They're also extremely busy operating the Jimmy Carter Canal in Panama unloading containers of Tinkertoys, Christmas decorations and statues of Jimmy Carter.

5 posted on 03/17/2006 8:18:16 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

They have already taken San Francisco....


6 posted on 03/17/2006 8:22:35 AM PST by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

And unfortunately there isn't a whole lot we can do about it.


7 posted on 03/17/2006 8:28:02 AM PST by U S Army EOD (LINCOLN COUNTY RED DEVILS STATE CHAMPIONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Me think China needs a regime change.

Oh wait they have Nukes never mind.


8 posted on 03/17/2006 8:30:16 AM PST by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

"""And unfortunately there isn't a whole lot we can do about it."""


Why is that?


9 posted on 03/17/2006 8:31:14 AM PST by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: commonerX
Right-O!

The Chinese and Korean Communists have nuclear devices and we want to steer clear of those enemies.

China is rewarded for murdering Christians by our importing and buying hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Christmas decorations manufactured by slaves.

Castro continues to flip us off due to a cockamamie agreement hatched between the Brothers Kennedy and Nikita Kruschev. In between trysts with the late Marilyn Monroe they agreed not to invade if the USSR would take the nasty missiles back home. Now they're still pointed at the USA, but from our friend Russia.

10 posted on 03/17/2006 8:34:46 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

"IMHO, China is going to take Taiwan"

And just what makes you so sure about that?


11 posted on 03/17/2006 8:36:58 AM PST by Dr. Marten ((http://thehorsesmouth.blog-city.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

Agreed. And there is not a lot we can do about it unless we are willing to risk a massive war. I'm talking about 3,000 casualties a day. It also would have the possibility of escalating to a nuclear exchange.


12 posted on 03/17/2006 8:39:20 AM PST by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

"IMHO, China is going to take Taiwan"

It is in the realm of possible. What I do not get is why is China busting a hump when there are other means in which it can develop far more cheaply? If I was them expansion in Africa is much cheaper and with far greater financial returns. Send the young men out there and women that are willing to move to Africa should have the child limit lifted fom them.


13 posted on 03/17/2006 8:39:32 AM PST by American Vet Repairman (Liberalism has killed more Americans than the Taliban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Just like I've been saying for around 13 years now, our boys will die fighting a nation whose military build-up was financed almost exclusively by our insane trade policies.

for emphasis.
14 posted on 03/17/2006 8:40:47 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

If you treat Nuke countries with a different set of rules then countries without it sends a message; get nukes.


15 posted on 03/17/2006 8:43:31 AM PST by commonerX (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle
"IMHO, China is going to take Taiwan They may wait until we step into Iran, but they are going to take it by force."

I think you're 100% dead on with that prediction.
16 posted on 03/17/2006 8:45:13 AM PST by Mcirrus (Future Reference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Just like I've been saying for around 13 years now, our boys will die fighting a nation whose military build-up was financed almost exclusively by our insane trade policies.

I would add our insane banking policies.

17 posted on 03/17/2006 8:50:09 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

"How I loathe those who fought to make this so"

Amen!


18 posted on 03/17/2006 9:09:39 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

"Agree"

You too. What makes you so sure there's going to be a war?

I'd suggest that you probably have more to learn about China and Taiwan than what you read here on FR.


19 posted on 03/17/2006 9:16:14 AM PST by Dr. Marten ((http://thehorsesmouth.blog-city.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Travis McGee; SLB

.......China's high tech ability doesn't concern me as much as their low tech manpower does.


20 posted on 03/17/2006 9:20:20 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson