Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy for Israel Loses Supreme Court Appeal [Pollard]
AP ^ | 3/20/6

Posted on 03/20/2006 7:56:46 AM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: Shalom Israel

Further it is common for "false-flag" operations to be used to convince an agent that they are working for one country and are actually working for another.


21 posted on 03/20/2006 8:32:14 AM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
And Pollard should have been stood up against a wall and shot.

While I agree with your sentiment here, the problem is that that is not in accordance with our present laws. The laws apparently say that the guy should have been freed by now.

ML/NJ

22 posted on 03/20/2006 8:37:12 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
Pollard gave Israel information to which she was entitled under the 1983 memorandum of understanding, exactly once.

How could you possibly know that, when the basic issue under consideration in this case before the U.S. Supreme Court was that the U.S. government did not want to publicly to reveal all of the information Pollard provided to Israel?

23 posted on 03/20/2006 8:49:12 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sofaman
Pollard should rot in prison....Israel SHOULD have apologized, we are NOT pure as the driven snow in the espionage arena and suggesting that we are is ridiculous...and those that see this as a "semitic" issue, are indeed "anti-semitic".

Well said.

24 posted on 03/20/2006 8:49:25 AM PST by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RKV
The exact nature of the harm is irrelevant

I didn't raise the question: the poster to whom I replied did, when he asserted that "incalculable harm" was done.

When you get a security clearance you swear not to disclose the secured information to unauthorized persons. The Israeli agents he gave the info to were not authorized and he was not in a position to freelance the decision.

Granted. Others have been convicted of passing information to allies before. None of them got life sentences; in fact half of them were sentenced to less than 4 years.

25 posted on 03/20/2006 8:50:30 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Further it is common for "false-flag" operations to be used to convince an agent that they are working for one country and are actually working for another.

Israel has already made it clear he was working for them.

26 posted on 03/20/2006 8:51:19 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
Your post is meaningless for two basic reasons:

1. What kind of information did those "others" provide to our allies?

2. Israel is not an "ally" of the United States in any formal (i.e., legal) sense of the word.

27 posted on 03/20/2006 8:53:52 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
How could you possibly know that...

You raise a good question: how could you possibly know what Pollard gave Israel?

It is a matter of record, however, that the method of counting "compromised" documents included at least: the entirety of any document of which Pollard got so much as one sentence; the entirety of any document referenced in any way by anything Pollard got. So, for example, a single page might be counted as "compromising" several 500-page volumes. In this way, eleven bundles, each able to fit in a briefcase, were deemed to have "compromised" several moving-vans full of material.

As for the claims that Pollard compromised agents in Russia, the accusation came from none other than Aldritch Ames and Robert Hanssen--who were spying for Russia, and were the ones actually guilty of this crime. Pollard did not have the "blue stripe" clearance necessary to access names of agents.

To give Cap Weinberger his due, it appears that he believed Pollard was responsible for the crimes of Ames and Hanssen, who had not yet been caught.

28 posted on 03/20/2006 9:01:49 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Apparently the SCourt says you are wrong.

The laws apparently say that the guy should have been freed by now.

29 posted on 03/20/2006 9:08:14 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
To give Cap Weinberger his due, it appears that he believed Pollard was responsible for the crimes of Ames and Hanssen, who had not yet been caught.

Although he may have believed it at the time, now, after those others were caught, he doesn't consider Pollard all that important.

Asked in an interview why he omitted the incident, Weinberger casually replied, “Because it was, in a sense, a very minor matter but made very important.” Asked to elaborate, Weinberger repeated, “As I say, the Pollard matter was comparatively minor. It was made far bigger than its actual importance.”

30 posted on 03/20/2006 9:09:34 AM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
You raise a good question: how could you possibly know what Pollard gave Israel?

I don't have to know -- I'm just refuting your point. YOU are the one who thinks Pollard's crimes weren't serious enough to warrant his punishment in the U.S. Federal justice system, and I simply pointed out that you can't possibly know that.

The fact that Israel's extensive lobbtying efforts in the late 1990s couldn't even get a pardon for Pollard from Bill Clinton -- about as cheap a whore and as unprincipled and mentally dysfunctional a politician as anything the U.S. has ever seen -- is a good indication that the damage Pollard did to this country is far more serious than anyone seems to realize.

31 posted on 03/20/2006 9:09:34 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
You do the crime, you do the time.

Pollard felt above the law; now he has to reap the consequences. Since the road to hell is paved with good intentions, his good intentions are not good enough.

32 posted on 03/20/2006 9:09:43 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
What kind of information did those "others" provide to our allies?

Here are some examples:

Name Spied for Served In
S. Baba South Africa 5 months 1982
S. Scranage Guyana 8 months 1986-87
S. Morrison Great Britain 3 months 1985-86
T. Dole South Africa 5 years 1989-94
A. Helmy Egypt 2 years 1992-94
M. Schwartz Saudi Arabia no time;
discharged from the
Navy without pension
1996

Israel is not an "ally" of the United States in any formal (i.e., legal) sense of the word.

They aren't members of Nato, true. However, they're friendlies. In order to be guilty of the actual crime of "treason", you must be spying for an enemy nation in a time of war. Israel not only isn't an enemy nation, it isn't even a hostile nation.

33 posted on 03/20/2006 9:17:56 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
YOU are the one who thinks Pollard's crimes weren't serious enough to warrant his punishment in the U.S. Federal justice system

Straw man. I didn't say he didn't deserve punishment. The question is whether he deserved life in prison.

34 posted on 03/20/2006 9:18:46 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The fact that Israel's extensive lobbtying efforts in the late 1990s couldn't even get a pardon for Pollard from Bill Clinton -- about as cheap a whore and as unprincipled and mentally dysfunctional a politician as anything the U.S. has ever seen...

Good analogy. Like any whore, Clinton would rather be paid and then not "love you long time." He pressured Israel into highly damaging concessions, promising Pollard's release as an inducement--but unfortunately for the Israelis, they gave in without forcing him to perform first.

Clinton is certainly no friend of Israel.

35 posted on 03/20/2006 9:24:56 AM PST by Shalom Israel (There's a reason cows ain't extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

Another reason why it is criminal to steal US intel, no matter the reasons, is that once it's out of US hands, we cannot control who sees it.

Now Pollard whined that he----and his ex-wife Anne who was in on the conspiracy----were altruists, motivated to spy by the purest intentions.

Yet, Pollard pocketed money, and the wife received expensive jewelry, as payments for stealing US intel that was sold to America's enemies.

So much for altruism.


36 posted on 03/20/2006 9:33:38 AM PST by Liz (Liberty consists in having the power to do that which is permitted by the law. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Shalom Israel
I didn't ask who these people were -- I asked what kind of classified information they provided to other countries.

They aren't members of Nato, true. However, they're friendlies. . . . Israel not only isn't an enemy nation, it isn't even a hostile nation.

As far as the U.S. is concerned, Israel has the same legal status as Egypt -- i.e., the U.S. grants them formal recognition as a nation and has agreed to provide direct active military support in very limited circumstances (kudos to anyone who knows exactly what these circumstances are). Neither country is an ally in the formal sense of the word, which means the U.S. has not signed a mutual defense treaty with them in which both countries formally agree to provide military support to the other in the event of aggression by outsiders. The U.S. has signed formal treaties of this sort (NATO, SEATO, etc.) with a number of countries around the world that make these countries allies of ours. No such treaty exists between the U.S. and Israel, so Pollard's supporters have no legal basis for their claim that "spying for an ally" is a less serious offense than spying for anyone else.

In order to be guilty of the actual crime of "treason", you must be spying for an enemy nation in a time of war.

Right. This is why Pollard was never charged with treason.

37 posted on 03/20/2006 9:42:39 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Burn in hell Pollard. Traitor.


38 posted on 03/20/2006 9:47:56 AM PST by steel_resolve (An intolerant culture will seek to impose it's will on the tolerant one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Israeli blood is apparently worth more to the Israelis than American blood is

Israeli blood is more precious than American blood to a lot of FReepers as well.

39 posted on 03/20/2006 9:52:44 AM PST by Sometimes A River (http://www.theonion.com/content/node/46031)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Pollard... be happy... you should be spending your days making little rocks from big rocks, or better... 6' under.

Just think... Klintoon was getting the hard press to commute this POS's sentence... probably would have happened if his lie-brary got more donation coinage.

40 posted on 03/20/2006 9:57:48 AM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson