To: kellynla
I think Fitzgerald may be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct. I believe Justice Dept guidelines say that the first step in such an investigation is determining whether any crime was committed. If there was no crime, there should have been no investigation. There appears to have been no crime, and Fitzgerald should have drawn that conclusion.
38 posted on
03/20/2006 8:44:54 AM PST by
gogeo
To: gogeo
"I think Fitzgerald may be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct."
good luck with that...LOL
all these clowns in D.C. are taking advantage of the American taxpayers and until we have term limits we'll continue to get screwed...
41 posted on
03/20/2006 8:49:26 AM PST by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
To: gogeo
I think Fitzgerald may be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct. I believe Justice Dept guidelines say that the first step in such an investigation is determining whether any crime was committed. If there was no crime, there should have been no investigation. There appears to have been no crime, and Fitzgerald should have drawn that conclusion. Fraud? Can we indict him and make him pay us back the money he's wasted? And triple that amount because he's been negligent?
62 posted on
03/20/2006 9:55:59 AM PST by
Real Cynic No More
(A member of the Appalachian-American minority -- and proud of it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson