Posted on 03/20/2006 6:07:19 PM PST by TVenn
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Export-Import Bank, a federal agency, has given a preliminary commitment to backing Westinghouse Electric Company's bid to build Chinese nuclear reactors.
It's part of an aggressive effort by the U.S. government to create American jobs and chip away at the trade imbalance between China and the U.S., said a spokesman for the bank.
Should the deal get final approval, Westinghouse and/or the Chinese government would be the beneficiary of loans or loan guarantees of almost $5 billion to build nuclear power plants in China.
While Westinghouse is based in the U.S., it is currently owned by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., which has made plans to sell it off to Toshiba, a Japanese conglomerate.
So far, no one in the U.S. government is showing any interest in scrutinizing the sale over the transfer of nuclear-power technology.
The saga began just over a year ago when the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the U.S., a federal agency whose board members are appointed by the president, provided the preliminary commitment to a request from Westinghouse for a combination of guaranteed and direct loans of up to almost $5 billion to support export sales to construct four nuclear power plants at two sites in China.
The Ex-Im Bank, as it is known, boasts of assisting in financing U.S. goods and services to developing markets around the world. It typically finances around $15 billion in U.S. exports annually.
While that deal got almost no notice at the time – despite China's record of spreading nuclear technology throughout the world – last month the British parent company that owns Westinghouse agreed to sell it off to Toshiba, a Japanese conglomerate, for $5.4 billion in cash, a deal that is expected to close later this year.
Undersecretary for Export Administration David McCormick said Wednesday in a speech in Pennsylvania he had no plans to review the bid on the basis of the nuclear-transfer issue.
"The deal is not being formally reviewed," said McCormick, who heads the Commerce Department agency. "It's unclear if this deal required (U.S. government) review or not. Scrutiny would be justified, he said, if "there's a perceived or actual threat to national security."
Congress has not opposed the Westinghouse sale. In fact, the only member to call for scrutiny, Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas, a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, recently dropped his concerns. In a letter to Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pennsylvania, whose district includes Monroeville, where Westinghouse is based, Hall called Japan "one of our finest allies."
Meanwhile, Westinghouse may have a better shot at the $8 billion in nuclear contracts bid by China. Its chief competitor for the project, the state-controlled French company Areva SA is considering dropping its bid because of concerns about nuclear-technology transfers to the Chinese. Areva SA has reportedly refused to match the offer from Westinghouse.
While China has run massive trade surpluses with the U.S. for many years, Phil Cogan, a spokesman for the Ex-Im Bank said efforts like this one are designed to offset the trade imbalance and create jobs for American workers.
In the last five years, here is the trend on China trade surpluses with the U.S.:
# 2001 $83 billion
# 2002 $103 billion
# 2003 $124 billion
# 2004 $162 billion
# 2005 $201 billion
In U.S.-China trade, that's a total of $673 billion in trade surpluses for the Chinese (or trade deficits for America) in just the last five years.
Not only is the U.S. government not questioning the deal to build nuclear reactors in China, it is considering financing it in part and using political influence at the highest levels to consummate the arrangement.
"The U.S. government has been very supportive of overall China-U.S. nuclear cooperation,'' says Gavin Liu, Westinghouse's representative in Beijing. "It's a very, very critical market for Westinghouse.''
China's nuclear-power market is growing faster than any other in the world. The four planned reactors are the first of more than 20 in a $54 billion push to quadruple Chinese nuclear-power capacity by 2020 – an effort to ease power shortages in an economy that grew 9.5 percent last year.
Read more details by getting full access to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin with an annual or monthly subscription
# 2001 $83 billion
# 2002 $103 billion
# 2003 $124 billion
# 2004 $162 billion
# 2005 $201 billion
In U.S.-China trade, that's a total of $673 billion in trade surpluses for the Chinese (or trade deficits for America) in just the last five years.
Well we have go to make money somehow, since our manufacturing is hauling butt to the Third World.
The financing of our own destruction.
Gee, and I thought that meant Bill Clinton was at it again!
It was recently sold by the British to Toshiba, a Japanese firm. So where will the profits from this subsidized sale go?
They won't stay here.
20 years of free trade has screwed this country.
ping.
20 years of free trade has screwed this country.
Wasn't it almost 20 years ago that some US Congressmen were bashing a Toshiba radio on the Capitol steps because they had given submarine propeller technology to the Soviets?
That's OK. The question for the public should be 'haro dis iz produkt sooport, may i help pleeze'
Twenty years of us driving a Toyota instead of a Buick has screwed this country.
The US wouldn't let them build any plants here. Its go out of business or sell out. The stock holders decided to sell.
posted 4 hours ago
"Twenty years of us driving a Toyota instead of a Buick has screwed this country."
I have driven nothing but Toyota's since I was old enough to drive. They last longer and are smoother. A Buick? No thanks.
American firms would like to build nuke plants in the US, but due to various factors they will have to find their business in Asia instead where 300 new nuke plants are needed right now.
OK, We're screwed.
As I see it, the problem is that only America opened its markets to foreign nations. The rest of the world (particularly Asia) used this to their advantage.
Did you know that we also pay Russia billions for them to maintain the Russian Military Nuclear program? The Russians used some of this money to build Topel-M SS-27 missiles, and modern nuclear warheads, built off of our W-88 nuke design (China also has this)
Twenty years of Buick providing inferior products, and employee unions plundering the Big Three, has helped screw this country
"The US wouldn't let them build any plants here. Its go out of business or sell out."
You hit the nail on the head right there!!
Stupid environmental laws have run off nuclear power, the oil business, steel mills etc. We will pay dearly for the idiocy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.