Posted on 03/20/2006 11:18:14 PM PST by usarmymedic
usarmymedic, hold your head high!
Issaquahking, huh? Washington homie? I'm here. Doing the I-5 Army thing. I'll check out MS.BEHAVIN in the down time. Thank you.
Thanks, no hard feelings?
Well, media propaganda is always asking to shift burden of proof squarely on America. It's warfare Einsatzgruppen by liberals. No argument is allowed.
hehe. I gotta ping. Thanks.
yes you did! :) this is way to good to keep to myself. actually i am thinking about who else i can ping this too. :)
thank you so much for taking the time to type this all out, and thank you for serving our country! :))
I only go by the stuff at the end of the tally. President Bush, and I prefer to call him by the office due his name and title, did win. No Supreme Court intervention was necessary. No K. Harris necessary. He won. I'm about sick of NEW Kerry stickers being sported about. President Bush won. Don't like it? Win one yourselves. And for the record, I am neither Republican or Democrat. I am a registered Libertarian, like it or not. I've spent my time campaigning for my candidates. President Bush, in my opinion, was the best for the job! No question in my mind.
OK, you guys got me again. Smalliville? Is that like "The Village" by Shyamalan? I'm not up on FReeper talk.
ping! to my fellow American in Canada! :) thought you might find this interesting.
|
|
usarmymedic
Since Aug 28, 2005
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||||
The village.
Oh, cripes! I watched that movie and it made me pucker with anger!
"What! You don't have any friggin guns?". "Blow them stupid 'monsters' to hell! You pussies"
But that was just me.
I still haven't heard one credible criticism of this current administration....O.K....let me start with: Spending like A DEMOCRAT?
BTTT! Another mystery to unravel ... ;-)
Judgemdude,
No fault, but the burden of proof is always on the negative. Never took LD debate in school? We will always have the burden of proof. Always. We say "Saddam has WMD." And for some reason, we (conservatives) think we have the upper hand, demanding evidence to the contrary (albeit simplistic argumentation at this point, but grant me a little room here). For some reason, it's like the California Gubernatorial primaries; we give our arguments, they respond and for some reason, we recoil at the audacity of their logical fallacies and think we have a duty to defend ourselves. STOP. Stop defending. Let's go offensive for a Congressional term or two. Good grief. What the hell is wrong with us? Do you honestly believe that we are the minority. We are not. We have only lost the battle with the media. That is not the soul of America. Don't give up. The Left has not won. Teddy has not driven us off a bridge. Kerry has not pressured us into giving his version of events.
OK, OK. Got me on that one too. From here on out, any criticism that deals with spending or homeland security is void. 'Cause I think President Bush is jacked up on those, but that's a different post at that point. Yes, he spends like a Democrat. But guess what? I'm Libertarian, so most folks would expect ME to disagree with that. You know us, right? We believe the GOV should only be involved in defense, protection of the populus and military might, right? Oh, and securing our borders. Oh, and guaranteeing our right to defense. Did I miss something?
Bah Humbug.
Mishandling the Venezuelan coup
Illegal immigration.
Failure to use sufficient force in the war zones.
Excessive bipartisanship.
Yea, gay marriage and drug legalization.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.