Posted on 03/21/2006 10:08:20 AM PST by aculeus
Many opponents of the Iraq war both in the US and Europe have felt a not-so-secret sense of schadenfreude at the developing chaos in Iraq. While many might intellectually support the emergence of a stable, democratic, pro-western government in Baghdad, "success" in this matter would be seen as a vindication of all of the baggage that the Bush administration loaded on to this project, including its unilateralism, use of force and incompetent execution of the war's aftermath. Many would therefore be happy seeing Washington suffer a setback, to deter such interventions in the future.
But people should be careful what they wish for. A domestic nationalist backlash against the policies that led to the war is brewing, with implications for how the US will deal with Europe and the rest of the world down the road. Like it or not, American power and involvement are necessary to the proper functioning of world order, and the kind of role that a post-Iraq United States may play is very much up for grabs.
Two recent events constitute straws in the wind. After the protests and embassy-burnings over the Danish cartoons, no major US newspaper was willing to publish the cartoons, and most editorialists took a holier-thanthou attitude to those European papers that did. While one might question the prudence of publishing the cartoons, the violent reaction was a clear case of intimidation, in many cases officially sanctioned, and few Americans criticised the protests or stood up for the right of free speech. Many seemed to feel a certain satisfaction that this time Europeans rather than Americans were feeling Muslim wrath.
The second, and more egregious, case was the successful blocking by the US Congress of the purchase by Dubai Ports World of a British company that operates six US ports.
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
My spouse and I are taking what we call "one last trip" to Europe soon. One stop will be Berlin. Americans are concerned about Europe more than you know. Take care friend. I hope you see better days.
John Locke mentioned the rights for revolution by the people. In modern days, the advantages of the dictatorship with strong military threats the chance of success, which US will need to act as a proxy to guarantee the rights of revolution by force.
Poor Francis. He just can't get over how the moslems reminded him that he somehow overlooked a billion-plus savages in his stupid adolescent fantasy "The End of History."
Huh?
Gruss Gott minen freund.
Stay safe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.