Judge in Dover case reports hostile e-mails

York Daily Record [Penna] ^ | 24 March 2006 | LAURI LEBO

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Tax dollars are what gives darwinism its life."

No, it's the evidence.

"TOE is at the top of the food chain of welfare."

No, that would be what ID/creationism is trying for. They want handouts. ID is trying to get into the science classroom through an affirmative action program. It's no less a parasite then any other left-wing philosophy.

" Any cuts or lack of expected funding really does threaten darwinists, that I know for a FACT."

Funding in what?

[SuzyQue]

I looked for this quote used by Ginsberg in a February speech, and I can't find a site with the original. It's always only "attributed" to Ginsberg with no original source. Do you know, did this statement actually appear on a blog site? Which one? Where?

[From many - one.]

No real problem, again.

We don't train people, there are none to worry about their jobs. Colleges and grad sschools are already filling much, maybe most of their science spaces with foreign students.

Good American scientists can also vote with their feet and go where the research dollars are. It's called brain drain.

[Dimensio]

But the darling of the atheist left?

I have thus far seen no evidence to suggest that the judge is either an atheist or a leftist. Why, then, would he be the "darling" of the atheist left?

[Just mythoughts]

"No, it's the evidence."

TOE is by design darwin's description of evidence. You find it credible and that is your God given right as is mine to see the incredibleness of the theory.


"No, that would be what ID/creationism is trying for. They want handouts. ID is trying to get into the science classroom through an affirmative action program. It's no less a parasite then any other left-wing philosophy."

This is just plain funny considering all that art work without one cell of evidence used to promote darwin.

"Funding in what?"

Well to say more would be to identify without permission, suffice it to say somebody got a 'cut' in funding.

[linda_22003]

Because he didn't agree with the creationists, he must be. That's the only alternative, apparently.

[From many - one.]

You're correct, of course. The prevasive and frank dishonesty must have gotten to him in ways that some here don't seem to be able to recognize.

[Just mythoughts]

The application of the scientific methodology using survival of the fittest has been in place in our public education since government deemed it credible.

The results are plain to see government must care for the least fit.

[furball4paws]

Well the Left surely likes his decision, as would any objective person, Left or Right. But these personal physical attacks I am sure have the Left Wing Press laughing and saying "Keep 'em coming - just shows you that if you don't toe the Cr/ID line you're open to vilification and physical threats (in the Kansas Prof's case, physical attacks)."


Yeh, great image for American Conservatives.

[Dimensio]

The results are plain to see government must care for the least fit.

I believe that you have fundamentally misunderstood the implications of evolution.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" TOE is by design darwin's description of evidence."

No, it isn't. It has been verified by thousands of different scientists in many different fields. If what Darwin proposed didn't hold up, most scientists wouldn't have accepted it and would still not accept it.

"You find it credible and that is your God given right as is mine to see the incredibleness of the theory."

Because I actually understand the theory, and you don't.

" This is just plain funny considering all that art work without one cell of evidence used to promote darwin."

You have seen and been presented with literally thousands of pages of evidence for evolution. I have yet to see ONE piece of evidence for ID/creationism. ID is gutless choice, and the promoters of the claim are trying to sidestep accepted scientific practice to get their theological claim into a science classroom. They are trying to use the power of government to change what science is. They are leftists in conservative clothing.

" Well to say more would be to identify without permission, suffice it to say somebody got a 'cut' in funding."

So, you made a claim you couldn't back up. I see. :)

[Senator Bedfellow]

I am myself today. Moreso than I have been lately.

:^)

[Condorman]

In fact, the media blows up the comments of "terrorists" like Ann Coulter and Phyllis Schlafly to link them to "threats" against judges.

May I assume you are on the record with similar views about the Craig Kilborn "snipers wanted" incident?

[puroresu]

LOL! Well, I hope you have a fine day and a fine weekend!

[Just mythoughts]

There are some evolutionists that I will not respond to.

Just being nice.

[From many - one.]

What is "scientific methodology?"

Is it related to the scientific method?

How does survival of the fittest apply to schools? Does it mean that good students go further in school? Is that bad?

[From many - one.]

prevasive=pervasive

[From many - one.]

I thought the official crid line was that he beat himself up.

[furball4paws]

The CR/ID line is probably that, but RWP and a few others have been watching closely and the attack seems to be real. This Brown Shirt mentality has got to go if American Conservatism is to make progress.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"The application of the scientific methodology using survival of the fittest has been in place in our public education since government deemed it credible.

The results are plain to see government must care for the least fit. "

Your logic is, how shall we say, less than convincing. If survival of the fittest is what is being taught as the correct ethical system, that would mean that least fit would NOT being getting cared for. Do you even read what you write?