Skip to comments.
Saddam, Al Qaeda Did Collaborate, Documents Show
NYSun ^
| March 24, 2006
| By ELI LAKE
Posted on 03/26/2006 5:31:04 AM PST by Kimberly GG
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Old Sarge
[To the Left, it's more like walking after an enema...]
Hilarious, descriptive and true...LOL
21
posted on
03/26/2006 9:00:10 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
To: eyespysomething
22
posted on
03/26/2006 9:07:27 AM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: eyespysomething
Thanks for the ping. As I was reading it, it was mentioned on FNC.
23
posted on
03/26/2006 9:11:14 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
To: Kimberly GG
Bump. Bob Kerrey is hardly part of the VRWC.
To: Kimberly GG
...new documents translated last night by ABC News did not prove Saddam Hussein played a role in any way in plotting the attacks of September 11, 2001. And how about OKC?
25
posted on
03/26/2006 9:43:53 AM PST
by
TXnMA
(TROP: Satan's most successful earthly venture...)
To: HistorianDorisKearnsGoodwad; snugs
But at that point, the public, who have been fed long periods of denials, will ignore the truth because they will have already made up their minds that the reports are false. Then ABC will run more polls, and say that the public sees no connection between Hussein and al-Qaida. The Sunday Talk Shows seem to be a big part of the effort, although Foxnews helps keep some real stuff on the TV.
To: Kimberly GG; eyespysomething
Bob Kerrey, was careful to say that new documents translated last night by ABC News did not prove Saddam Hussein played a role in any way in plotting the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Is anyone looking for documents that prove Saddam worked with bin Laden for 9/11?
The only people who make that claim are Democrats when they're trying to discredit Republicans by throwing up this straw man argument ...
It's not that they collaborated on 9/11, it's that Saddam was harboring terrorists and attempting to work with them at all.
Anyone remember the Bush Doctrine?
27
posted on
03/26/2006 10:31:03 AM PST
by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: TXnMA
And how about OKC?That's what I'm waiting for.
To: eyespysomething
29
posted on
03/26/2006 11:08:27 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: JohnEBoy
If you notice, liberals are always moving the goalposts.Yep. But more like excavating one area, then blasting parts away (while asking you to turn off your radio), then saying, oops, gotta go over here, and doing the same thing.....
30
posted on
03/26/2006 11:14:24 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
To: bmwcyle
So you have Iraqi intel and Al Qaida meeting in Feb 2005, then you have OKC (the Phillipines connection), Riyadh, Khobar, TWA 800, and others in the next 2 years.
Hmmm...
To: SE Mom
"I have only ONE question- when will Chris Matthews interview him on Hardball?"
When Matthews gets his head out of his butt. Meaning never.
To: Kimberly GG
And the attempted assassination of Bush senior clearly illustrates that either Iraq had an agency that conducted foreign terrorism or Iraq contracted foreign terrorists.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson