Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'American Theocracy,' by Kevin Phillips Clear and Present Dangers
New York Times ^ | March 26, 2006 | Darkwolf377

Posted on 03/26/2006 5:35:56 AM PST by Darkwolf377

Four decades ago, Kevin Phillips, a young political strategist for the Republican Party, began work on what became a remarkable book. In writing "The Emerging Republican Majority" (published in 1969), he asked a very big question about American politics: How would the demographic and economic changes of postwar America shape the long-term future of the two major parties? ...(clip)...A stronger Republican Party, he believed, would restore stability and order to a society experiencing disorienting and at times violent change. Shortly before publishing his book, he joined the Nixon administration to help advance the changes he had foreseen.

Phillips has remained a prolific and important political commentator in the decades since, but he long ago abandoned his enthusiasm for the Republican coalition he helped to build. His latest book (his 13th) looks broadly and historically at the political world the conservative coalition has painstakingly constructed over the last several decades. No longer does he see Republican government as a source of stability and order. Instead, he presents a nightmarish vision of ideological extremism, catastrophic fiscal irresponsibility, rampant greed and dangerous shortsightedness. (His final chapter is entitled "The Erring Republican Majority.") In an era of best-selling jeremiads on both sides of the political divide, "American Theocracy" may be the most alarming analysis of where we are and where we may be going to have appeared in many years. It is not without polemic, but unlike many of the more glib and strident political commentaries of recent years, it is extensively researched and for the most part frighteningly persuasive.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bookreview; gop; kevinphillips; newyorkslimes; republicanmajority; rinos; theocracy; war
Not sure if I can post the whole thing, but I'll sum it up: The New York Times has found a Republican writer to like--one who slams the Administration as a "theocracy" and the WOT as a "war for oil". Interesting how they mention the looting of the Iraq art museum, although I could have sworn that story was overplayed and much of it retracted.
1 posted on 03/26/2006 5:35:59 AM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The only real danger to our Republic currently is the in the closet fascists like Kevin Phillips who would gleefully deny the civil rights of anyone who does not agree with his far far Left wing viewpoints. Kevin Phillips is just another example of the rabid intolerance the American Left has for anyone who does not march in lock step with their emotion based political opinions.
2 posted on 03/26/2006 5:38:50 AM PST by MNJohnnie (I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Typical ant-Christian fear-mongering from a Rino/leftist. As if our country had not been based firmly on Christian values since our inception.


3 posted on 03/26/2006 5:40:26 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Typical ant-Christian fear-mongering from a Rino/leftist. As if our country had not been based firmly on Christian values since our inception.

The Liberal MSM used Kevin Phillips to bash the Republicans. They used him so much that National Reivew used to joke that his real first name was even. As in even Kevin Phillips thinks this or that Republican idea is stupid.

4 posted on 03/26/2006 5:54:04 AM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The American press in the first days of the Iraq war reported extensively on the Pentagon's failure to post American troops in front of the National Museum in Baghdad, which, as a result, was looted of many of its great archaeological treasures. Less widely reported, but to Phillips far more meaningful, was the immediate posting of troops around the Iraqi Oil Ministry, which held the maps and charts that were the key to effective oil production.

If I had a choice between protecting one of the other, there is absolutely no contest. Send troops to guard Iraq's most valuable resource - oil.

5 posted on 03/26/2006 5:55:44 AM PST by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
"It is not without polemic"

No kidding -- just start with the hysterical title.

6 posted on 03/26/2006 5:57:24 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Phillips needs to come out of his Log Cabin Republican facade and admit that he has been a pseudo Republican for the MSM for over 20 years.

http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?fr=ybr_sbc&p=Kevin%20Phillips%20+%20Log%20Cabin%20Republicans


7 posted on 03/26/2006 6:07:50 AM PST by Grampa Dave (How long has the NY Slimes, Compost, and LA Slimes been Enroning (cooking) their books?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Clearly red meat for the typical New York Times subscriber. Any respectable writer would shun Paul Krugman and Kevin Phillips.


8 posted on 03/26/2006 6:13:20 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Kevin Phillips is NPR's favorite "Republican". Case closed.


9 posted on 03/26/2006 6:16:46 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Thanks for the links--funny how the NYT didn't mention THIS Philips title in their opening paragraphs:"American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush,"

I guess they figured that wouldn't give readers a clue as to his political allegiances. Just some obscure book about a minor figure, eh?

10 posted on 03/26/2006 6:17:59 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12
They used him so much that National Reivew used to joke that his real first name was even. As in even Kevin Phillips thinks this or that Republican idea is stupid.

LOL That's perfect!

Isn't it amazing how this article would have the casual reader think Phillips was some kind of rabid rightwinger up until he decided to write this book?

11 posted on 03/26/2006 6:19:12 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Another hatemongering anti-Christian in the John Danforth mold.


12 posted on 03/26/2006 6:19:40 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Whenever any maggot is the token Republican for NPR or the Ny Slimes, it is a safe bet re their reality versus their MSM image.

How many years has Patty Buckwheat Buchanite posed as a republican on tv?


13 posted on 03/26/2006 6:22:13 AM PST by Grampa Dave (How long has the NY Slimes, Compost, and LA Slimes been Enroning (cooking) their books?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
one who slams the Administration as a "theocracy" and the WOT as a "war for oil". Interesting how they mention the looting of the Iraq art museum, although I could have sworn that story was overplayed and much of it retracted.

PBS used to have this guy on during the 2004 Presidential Race to try to persuade its viewers into believing that Bush arranged things at the DC airport for the 9/11 terrorists to board the airplane unchecked.

14 posted on 03/26/2006 6:22:39 AM PST by Jim_Curtis (massive immigration is modern day slavery with the poorest citizens feeling the whip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
How many years has Patty Buckwheat Buchanite posed as a republican on tv?

I have a theory that they give Pat a call every time Noam Chomsky doesn't return their invites.

15 posted on 03/26/2006 6:24:02 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
PBS used to have this guy on during the 2004 Presidential Race to try to persuade its viewers into believing that Bush arranged things at the DC airport for the 9/11 terrorists to board the airplane unchecked.

Amazing. I've never heard of Phillips, and I sure didn't know about that. The NYT would have people like me believe the guy was as hardcore as they come until now.

16 posted on 03/26/2006 6:25:04 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Kevin Phillips told Tim Russert last night in an interview that he is not registered as a Republican. If he were, it would be of the RINO variety. But he is a joke, and the GOP is better without him.


17 posted on 03/26/2006 6:28:38 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

One of our younger relatives called last week and while laughing said that one of tv's morning left wing pr show hosts introduced Patty as a Republican.


18 posted on 03/26/2006 6:32:03 AM PST by Grampa Dave (How long has the NY Slimes, Compost, and LA Slimes been Enroning (cooking) their books?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

No longer does he see Republican government as a source of stability and order. Instead, he presents a nightmarish vision of ideological extremism, catastrophic fiscal irresponsibility, rampant greed and dangerous shortsightedness.

And do we get any thanks for this.....NOOOO.
When Jerry Falwell becomes king of America....Phillips will get his.


19 posted on 03/26/2006 6:41:54 AM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Nuts.


20 posted on 03/26/2006 6:46:43 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

For a better view of the evil rightwing
The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0008EH6LE/qid=1143384350/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-0982097-1969522?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

From Publishers Weekly
In the introduction to this engaging study of American conservatism, Micklethwait and Wooldridge of the Economist disclaim any allegiance to America's "two great political tribes." It is this Tocquevillian quality of informed impartiality that makes their book so effective at conveying how profoundly the right has reshaped the American political landscape over the past half century. The authors trace the history of the conservative movement from the McCarthy era, when "conservatism was a fringe idea," to the second Bush administration and the "victory of the right." They dissect the new "conservative establishment," which combines the intellectual force of think tanks, business interest groups and sympathetic media outlets with the "brawn" of "footsoldiers" from the populist social conservative wing of the GOP, and argue that continuing Republican hegemony is likely. Democratic optimists who point to favorable demographic trends are exaggerating the liberalism of Latino and professional voters, say the authors, while other factors, such as suburbanization and terrorism, will tend to promote Republican values. Still, the right should be worried about its own "capacity for extremism and intolerance" and about holding together its unlikely alliance of religious moralists and small-government activists. Even so, say the authors, conservative ideas are now so pervasive in American society that even a Kerry administration could do little to divert the country's long-term rightward drift. This epochal political transformation is rarely analyzed with the degree of dispassionate clarity that Micklethwait and Wooldridge bring to their penetrating analysis.

______________________________

Painting the Map Red: The Fight to Create a Permanent Republican Majority
by Hugh Hewitt
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0895260026/104-0982097-1969522?v=glance&n=283155

Painting the Map Red, the insider's guide to the 2006 elections and the crucial messages GOP candidates and activists will be adopting to foster the spread of Red States, is a must-read from Hugh Hewitt, nationally syndicated talk show host and political strategist.

From the Inside Flap
How to Win Everywhere Warning: this is the book the Democrats don¹t want you to read.
Painting the Map Red is the insider¹s blueprint for achieving a permanent Republican majority.

Bestselling author, political strategist, and nationally syndicated radio host Hugh Hewitt shows you how conservatives can take down the Democrats, expose their liberal extremism, and reignite the Reagan Revolution.

Calling on his own extensive experience‹and on the savvy political minds of Mark Steyn, Fred Barnes, Michael Barone, and others in exclusive interviews‹Hewitt reveals: The Five Key Messages and Four Crucial Steps to a permanent Republican majority. How big is too big? Which senator deserves to get pushed out of the Republican big tent. The next generation of liberal Democrats‹if you thought Ted Kennedy was bad, wait till you see the party of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Howard Dean. How extremist groups especially on the Internet are driving the Democrats¹ agenda. Why the Democrats¹ assault on religion is just ramping up. How Republicans can retake the courts and end Democrat obstruction. How the Democrats¹ alliance with liberal mainstream media can be turned against them both. Where we go from here: coming up with the right candidate after Bush

In politics, as in war, it pays to play offense, and Hugh Hewitt knows how the GOP can fight and win‹coast to coast.

Want another Reagan Revolution? Here¹s how. It¹s time to finish Painting the Map Red.


21 posted on 03/26/2006 6:54:33 AM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Valin
The books you cite would make interesting reading, I'm sure.

The reviews posted on Amazon give them high marks.

So can you explain why Hewitt's book ranks 10,551 in sales and The Right Nation ranks 72,214?

Kevin Phillips' new book is #1 on Amazon.

Are conservatives too busy posting on FreeRepublic these days to read books or what?

23 posted on 03/26/2006 9:30:30 AM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Syncretic
I don't care how much you guys hate Kevin Phillips, I have always liked him.

Good for you. Whoever said you couldn't like him?

I have a copy of "The Emerging Republican Majority" on my bookshelf that I bought when I was a kid. When the book came out, the idea of a Republican majority was bizarre. Phillips' analysis of the voting patterns of different American ethnic/cultural groups was perceptive, and, as far as I know, unprecedented.

OK, so what?

I thought he made a good point in his interview with Russert last night on CNBC: It was that the voters of the exurbs, who put Bush in the White House, are very vulnerable to the price of gasoline. "High gas prices threaten their way of life," was how Phillips put it.

Are you seriously trying to say that this common idea, which I've heard ten thousand times in my life, is somehow proof of his insight? What's next, is he going to reveal that water is wet? Genius!

I know from personal observation that when the price of gas goes up, the price of exurban real estate goes down. I personally think there were two bad mistakes in planning the Iraq war: 1) Overestimating the oil reserves reported by Saddam Hussein. Before the war, people kept saying that Iraq had the second largest oil reserve, next to Saudi Arabia. It's been a while since I heard that one. I don't know if it's true, but it does now appear that a big oil gusher from Iraq is not going to happen.

Why would that fact have to be repeated over and over again once it's been established? It's been awhile since I heard that Lincoln was elected President, but the fact remains, now doesn't it? That wasn't a claim of Saddam's--that's a geological fact.

You need reminding? here ya go:

http://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/world-top-ten-oil-reserves-countries-map.html

Country Billions of Barrels

1.Saudi Arabia 261.8

2.Canada 180.0

3.Iraq 112.5

There are plenty of other sources for the same info, so look it up, OK?

2) Thinking that after they removed Saddam Hussein, they could get the oil flowing. Novak has reported that the oil is not flowing because of pervasive, top-to-bottom corruption in the Iraqi government. The Bush administration should have expected the Iraqis to be corrupt and figured out how to work around that. Where is the plan?

The plan is in motion. It has been for quite some time. Novak has been against the war from the start, as has Phillips, so their objections are hardly objective ones. The plan is to place a democracy in the Middle East. Sorry, but that takes time--we can't wave a wand and just have it happen.

You've praised Phillips for predicting the Republican takeover--how long a time passed between his prediction and the reality? Well, I'm sorry, but building a democracy from the ground up is a LITTLE more complicated than having one party gain control (something that was pretty likely EVENTUALLY in a two-party system) over another.

Iraqi oil is a big deal. Mistakes about Iraqi oil are big, costly mistakes.

What mistakes?

I read an estimate recently that the Iraq war is has cost the average American family $20,000 so far. Do you think Americans will be happy to pay that for HIGHER gas prices? When will the oil start flowing? Any guesses?

No, because I'm no expert. But neither are you, and neither is anyone who claims that we could have picked a date on a map.

If you think Americans would be better off without our war on terror and ousting Saddam, I have to ask if you think Americans would be happy with the price of nuclear weapons going off in YOUR hometown.

24 posted on 03/26/2006 10:29:33 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

They found a Republican who is not only a anti-Christian hero to the Left but who was also a part of the most unsuccessful Republican administration in history... He was probably cheering for Nixon to resign and was, no doubt, loved by the Left at that time as well. I would guess he was also against the Viet Nam war "baby killers."

When you hear a RINO screeching about a "theocracy" they are angry over abortion and/or homosexual marriage and speical rights or they are of a different religion and can not tolerate hearing the J-word or the C-word.

But, dontchaknow, we theocrats have to stop chopping off the heads of the good liberals sooner or later and it is not a good idea to keep putting them in prisions for having sex and producing children out of wedlock. :)


25 posted on 03/26/2006 11:49:56 AM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Kevin phillips doesn't even qualify as a RINO. He's just a turncoat.


26 posted on 03/26/2006 11:53:02 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The New York Times has found a Republican writer to like-"

Misinformation from the Times, Phillips does not claim to be Republican any longer.

To save America, vote for gridlock.

27 posted on 03/26/2006 11:56:47 AM PST by ex-snook (John 17 - So that they may be one just as we are one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

So can you explain why Hewitt's book ranks 10,551 in sales and The Right Nation ranks 72,214?

"Painting the Map Red" has just been published, I expect it to rise.

"The Right Nation" is 2 years old, and sold well at the time, if memory serves.


28 posted on 03/26/2006 1:35:50 PM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

It wasn't so long ago that a president that said he WASN'T guided by God would be dragged from the White House and hung.....

Now, in today's whacko world, one who professes a belief is called theocratic???


29 posted on 03/26/2006 1:39:28 PM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

Bought it yesterday. The guy deserves a look based on "A Coming Republican Majority" alone. He sure got that one right- 35 years or so ago.


30 posted on 03/28/2006 9:25:41 AM PST by LongsforReagan (Dick Cheney is the best elected official in this country. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson