Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The X-37 Spaceplane to Fly At Mojave Spaceport
space.com ^ | 03/31/06 | Leonard David

Posted on 03/31/2006 5:18:30 PM PST by KevinDavis

Yet another experimental spaceplane may soon fly the skies over the Mojave, California inland spaceport.

The work pace appears to be accelerating in readying the unpiloted X-37 vehicle for a drop test high above the desert. Taking the craft to altitude for release will be the White Knight mothership, designed and operated by Scaled Composites of Mojave, California.

It was the White Knight that toted SpaceShipOne skyward for release, with that piloted rocketplane making repeated suborbital flights in 2004—bagging the $10 million Ansari X Prize in the process.

The White Knight/X-37 combination has undergone numbers of taxi and flight hops in preparation for the first release of the vehicle. But the drop test has been plagued several times by bad weather in the area, as well as telemetry issues between the vehicle and ground controllers. This week, according to SPACE.com sources, a new data link tower was installed to help solve the problem.

The X-37 test program is being carried out by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Space and Intelligence division of the Boeing Company, with some support from NASA.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: space; spaceplane; x37

1 posted on 03/31/2006 5:18:31 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 03/31/2006 5:19:03 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

3 posted on 03/31/2006 5:21:57 PM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Quite the set of projects these folks are involved in to some degree or other.

http://www.scaled.com/projects/index.html


4 posted on 03/31/2006 5:23:15 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

It's amazing how much people can do when there are no bureaucrats involved...


5 posted on 03/31/2006 5:24:38 PM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

It looks kinda like a minature shuttle, with V-tailfins.


6 posted on 03/31/2006 5:32:24 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
It's amazing how much people can do when there are no bureaucrats involved...

We'd probably be walking amongst the stars by now.... Terraforming planets/moons, and colonizing other worlds.

7 posted on 03/31/2006 6:07:38 PM PST by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

X-37 appears to be a Gummint project.


8 posted on 03/31/2006 6:40:07 PM PST by RightWhale (Nothing can evolve which has not been involved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Is this a result of NASA's retiring their B-52 mothership?
I thought I recalled that the X-43 was the last drop for it.

> ... unpiloted X-37 ... telemetry issues ...

X-37 lawn dart?
I'll bet NASA/Boeing spent more on the software for this
bird than Rutan spent on the whole WhiteKnight/SS1 project.


9 posted on 03/31/2006 7:04:00 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Best link ever, the Mojave Airport Weblog

http://www.mojaveweblog.com/index.html


10 posted on 03/31/2006 7:51:01 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (No one censors speech they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

It was turned over, in it's entirety to Scaled Composites.


11 posted on 04/01/2006 11:17:35 AM PST by SENTINEL (USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Commercial mother ship with bastard government son. ;)


12 posted on 04/02/2006 12:44:53 AM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
with bastard government son. ;)

The ugly stepchild.

13 posted on 04/02/2006 12:25:42 PM PDT by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/atlas/av020/080730delay.html

Lunar mapper and military vehicle swap launch slots

BY STEPHEN CLARK - SPACEFLIGHT NOW - Posted: July 30, 2008
The launch of NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been delayed until next February to make room on the Atlas 5 rocket’s cramped East Coast manifest for a secretive Air Force space plane, government officials said this week. The Air Force’s X-37B, a prototype space plane designed to ferry small payloads to and from Earth orbit, will launch aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas 5 rocket in November or December. The craft, also called the Orbital Test Vehicle, was previously scheduled to launch next February.

LRO had already suffered a one-month delay due to the late delivery of several science instruments, but things were looking good for launch in December, according to Benjy Neumann, deputy director for NASA’s exploration advanced capabilities division. “We got a request via ULA that the OTV mission, which was scheduled for February, had finished (thermal vacuum testing) and it was ready to go and it would like to earlier,” Neumann said. “Would we be willing to accommodate it?” Neumann said engineers estimated they had about three weeks of extra time in the schedule to launch in December. But because LRO and the piggyback LCROSS lunar impactor must travel a precise trajectory to the moon, engineers have to calculate a new flight path about every 11 days. The calculations mean launch windows are broken up into shorter four-day periods.

NASA’s launch contract with ULA originally stipulated 18 launch days in a 30-day period, but LRO would have only had eight chances to launch in December. “Although we had days on the calendar, they weren’t all days that we would be able to launch because of the trajectory calculation,” Neumann said. Then ULA proposed swapping LRO and the X-37B mission in the manifest, according to Neumann. At first, we pushed back on that and did not want to do it,” Neumann said. But NASA managers eventually agreed because it would relieve stress on the team preparing the spacecraft and give LRO a full slate of 18 launch days in February and March. The mission’s current target launch date is Feb. 27.

NASA received ULA’s request in early July, and the agency’s assistant associate administrator for launch services approved the swap July 22. “That was a much better situation because the Atlas 5 launch manifest for next year is full. If we stuck with December and missed our launch date ... we would end up delaying a year. That’s what ULA told us,” Neumann said. “That seemed to be a really prudent decision, plus OTV was asking for it,” Neumann said. “We felt they obviously had some kind of a need and we wanted to accommodate that as well.”

The delay means LRO will miss President Bush’s goal of sending a robotic probe to the moon by the end of 2008. The deadline was part of Bush’s Vision for Space Exploration announced in 2004. “There’s no reason we’re going to put any technical risk on a spacecraft just to meet that directive,” Neumann said. “We take the directive seriously, but we didn’t assume that there would never be a possibility that something could happen.” NASA informed the White House of the decision, and administration officials understand the reasons for the delay, Neumann said. “I think the White House understood the calculation and understood the point. We have not heard of anyone being pedantic and saying, ‘Hey, you said December and now you’ve missed it,’” Neumann said.

Officials were not able to estimate the cost of the delay, but the combined project’s cost is about $7 million per month, according to Grey Hautaluoma, NASA spokesperson. ASA’s Lunar Precursor Robotic Program, which includes LRO and LCROSS, has enough funding reserves to cover the extra cost, according to Neumann. LRO is currently undergoing environmental testing at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. Vibration testing is nearly complete, and then the spacecraft will be prepped for acoustic, electromagnetic and thermal vacuum testing through October. “They’ve been conducting functional tests at the same time and everything is fine,” Neumann said.

The spacecraft is scheduled to be transported to the Kennedy Space Center in November, officials said. LRO will use the 401 configuration of the Atlas 5 with four-meter fairing, no solid rocket boosters, and a single-engine Centaur upper stage outfitted for its unique mission to plunge into a crater near one of the moon’s poles. The Centaur’s impact will be observed by LCROSS, a secondary payload designed to search for water ice in the debris field created by the upper stage. LCROSS will have to target a new crater because of the delay until February, but scientists already have a lengthy list of interesting craters to choose from. LCROSS has already completed assembly and environmental testing at a Northrop Grumman Corp. facility in Redondo Beach, Calif. The spacecraft will be stored there until it ships to KSC later this year, a company spokesperson said.

The X-37B will launch aboard the 501 version of the Atlas 5. That configuration features a bulbous five-meter payload fairing enclosing the spacecraft and the Centaur upper stage. Images of this rocket configuration taken during a 2002 launch pad test can be seen here. http://www.spaceflightnow.com/atlas/av002/021217gallery/01.html The X-37B is about one-quarter the length and width of a space shuttle orbiter. The space plane is being manufactured by Boeing Co. and will weigh about five tons at launch, according to the Air Force. Officials have not released any details on the craft’s orbital mission. The X-37B will make an automated re-entry and land on a conventional runway in California.


Shh. Secret.


14 posted on 07/31/2008 8:59:56 AM PDT by RightWhale (Exxon Sux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson