Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Has Missiles To Carry Nuclear Warheads
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 4-7-2006 | Con Coughlin

Posted on 04/06/2006 7:22:57 PM PDT by blam

Iran has missiles to carry nuclear warheads

By Con Coughlin
(Filed: 07/04/2006)

Iran has successfully developed ballistic missiles with the capability to carry nuclear warheads.

Detailed analysis of recent test firings of the Shahab-3 ballistic missile by military experts has concluded that Iran has been able to modify the nose cone to carry a basic nuclear bomb. The discovery will intensify international pressure on Teheran to provide a comprehensive breakdown of its nuclear research programme.

An Iranian Shahab-3 missile on parade in Teheran

Last week, the United Nations Security Council gave Iran 30 days to freeze its uranium enrichment programme that many experts believe is part of a clandestine attempt to produce nuclear weapons.

Iran denies it is trying to acquire a nuclear arsenal. But ballistic missile experts advising the United States say it has succeeded in reconfiguring the Shahab-3 to carry nuclear weapons.

The Shahab-3 is a modified version of North Korea's Nodong missile which itself is based on the old Soviet-made Scud.

The Nodong, which Iran secretly acquired from North Korea in the mid-1990s, is designed to carry a conventional warhead. But Iranian engineers have been working for several years to adapt the Shahab-3 to carry nuclear weapons.

"This is a major breakthrough for the Iranians," said a senior US official. "They have been trying to do this for years and now they have succeeded. It is a very disturbing development."

The Shahab 3 has a range of 800 miles, enabling it to hit a wide range of targets throughout the Middle East - including Israel.

Apart from modifying the nose cone, Iranian technicians are also trying to make a number of technical adjustments that will enable the missile to travel a greater distance.

Western intelligence officials believe that Iran is receiving assistance from teams of Russian and Chinese experts with experience of developing nuclear weapons. Experts who have studied the latest version of the Shahab have identified modifications to the nose cone.

Instead of the single cone normally attached to this type of missile, the new Shahab has three cones, or a triconic, warhead. A triconic warhead allows the missile to accommodate a nuclear device and this type of warhead is normally found only in nuclear weapons.

According to the new research, the Iranian warhead is designed to carry a spherical nuclear weapon that would be detonated 2,000 feet above the ground, similar to the Hiroshima bomb.

Although US defence officials believe that Iran is several years away from acquiring nuclear weapons, they point out that the warhead could hold a version of the nuclear bomb Pakistan is known to have developed. Iran has acquired a detailed breakdown of Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

The development of the Shahab-3 is just one element of a wide-ranging missile development programme.

In 2003 the Iranians concluded another secret deal with North Korea to buy the Taepo Dong 2 missile, which has a range of 2,200 miles and would enable Iran to hit targets in mainland Europe.

Earlier this week the Iranians announced that they had successfully test-fired a new missile, the Fajr-3, which has the capability to evade radar systems and carry multiple warheads.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: carry; iran; irannukes; missiles; nuclear; warheads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2006 7:22:59 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

I'm shocked!!!


2 posted on 04/06/2006 7:23:54 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Iran Has Missiles To Carry Nuclear Warheads

Yeah, but they only plan to use them for peaceful purposes like producing energy.

3 posted on 04/06/2006 7:25:25 PM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Makes you wonder what the hell we are waiting for?


4 posted on 04/06/2006 7:25:35 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SJackson

ping


5 posted on 04/06/2006 7:27:12 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Last week, the United Nations Security Council gave Iran 30 days to freeze its uranium enrichment programme

And if they don't? Double secret probabation? I'm sure they're trembling in their boots over what the UN will do...

<./sarc>

6 posted on 04/06/2006 7:27:26 PM PDT by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is a major breakthrough

A nose cone? Any Iranian with a hammer and a sheet of metal can beat a nose cone into some shape in an afternoon.

7 posted on 04/06/2006 7:27:40 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

8 posted on 04/06/2006 7:28:04 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Have you hugged an illegal alien today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"This is a major breakthrough for the Iranians," said a senior US official. "They have been trying to do this for years and now they have succeeded. It is a very disturbing development."

Really....?

9 posted on 04/06/2006 7:28:22 PM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The nuclear warheads are coming.

Not to worry, the U.N will say they're multi-use missiles.


10 posted on 04/06/2006 7:28:51 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Iran is receiving assistance from teams of Russian and Chinese experts

That has to be a misstatement. Those nice countries are our trading partners in the new world order.

11 posted on 04/06/2006 7:29:25 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/missile/shahab-3.htm

Shahab-1 thru Shahab-6 and IRIS info


12 posted on 04/06/2006 7:29:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Have you hugged an illegal alien today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Here is a scenario, which is not as far fetched, as we would like it to be, in fact, given the insanity of the Mullahs it's more probable than not.



Iran could launch a nuclear missile against Israel, "to show the world they have them and are willing to use them", then make demands of the US, saying, that if the US is starting to prepare to attack them, they will launch their several other ones against Europe and the US.

NOW, what would we do?

Will the Dems take responsiblity, because the Mullah's would have never gotten into power in Iran, if it weren't for Jimmy Carter not supporting the Shah, and because we would have gone in BEFORE Iran got the nukes, except for the Dems having whipped up an anti-war sentiment.


13 posted on 04/06/2006 7:34:12 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Does Iran have a large enough supply of body bags?
14 posted on 04/06/2006 7:35:00 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This was the program to watch, and now we know. Iran will definitely build a missile arsenal (BTW, anybody notice the similarity of the photo to the old ones in Red Square?) and so the question becomes whether the Europeans can talk themselves into the fond illusion that it doesn't really represent a threat after all, that they can take care of the threat with negotiation. I'm not exaggerating, either - they actually managed to do this during the Cold War, and were it not for Reagan's stubborness the Pershings would never have been placed there.

Another interesting question will be whether they can turn the Shahab-6 into a true ICBM. If they can do that they can threaten New York and Washington D.C. as well as Paris and Berlin. That sort of development has taken a decade or so in the past but with Chinese and Russian help it might be considerably quicker. At that point Cold War II is the optimistic scenario.

15 posted on 04/06/2006 7:38:23 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Iran is also working on its Shahab-6, said to have a range of 3,500 miles. If we let them, sooner or later, they'll buy and install what they're after.


16 posted on 04/06/2006 7:58:58 PM PDT by familyop ("The Romans and their Empire were but a bauble in comparison to the Jews." --President John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"A nose cone? Any Iranian with a hammer and a sheet of metal can beat a nose cone into some shape in an afternoon."

Yes, but that would cause...ahem...delivery problems.

Nuclear weapons aren't like conventional explosives. For one thing, the radiation *from* the nuclear warhead can...mmmm...interfere with volatile rocket fuels...electronics...etc.

For another thing, vibrations from the rocket can crack the hyper-brittle heavy metals that comprise the physics package...and such vibrations can also interfere with the precise shapes involved.

Rocket-fuel fumes can likewise be problematic if they reach any of several nuclear weapon components.

These are non-trivial technical hurdles.

17 posted on 04/06/2006 8:00:52 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

A pre-emptive strike is the only solution even with the terrorist aftermath.


18 posted on 04/06/2006 8:02:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Iran is crazy.

They are a THREAT.


19 posted on 04/06/2006 8:03:27 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (God makes us strong for alittle while so that we can protect the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

That's the problem with these mullahs. No dong..


20 posted on 04/06/2006 8:07:54 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson