Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate kills border-security bill
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | April 8, 2006 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 04/08/2006 6:05:27 AM PDT by Cricket24

The Senate yesterday overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to secure the country's porous borders after years of warning voters of the dire need to do so. All but two Democrats and 20 Republicans voted against considering the border security-only bill, the last of three immigration votes in recent days. It was the only proposal that did not contain a guest-worker provision, and which many said would grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens already in the country. "I think politics got in front of policy on this issue," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, who voted against the bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/08/2006 6:05:28 AM PDT by Cricket24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

I'm shocked! SHOCKED, I say! Never in a million years could I have seen this coming. *Rolleyes*


2 posted on 04/08/2006 6:06:43 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

Could somebody post the 20 Republicans that voted against a security only bill?


3 posted on 04/08/2006 6:08:16 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Liberalism and Fundamental Islam have a lot in common....is it a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

"I think politics got in front of policy on this issue," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, who voted against the bill.

When Ted Kennedy talks about "politics" what he really means is the "taxpayers". The Congress, both Dems and Repubs, think that they are so superior to the rest of us.
This whole thing just infuriates me!!


4 posted on 04/08/2006 6:09:11 AM PDT by Cricket24 ("We have met the enemy and it's the U.S. press (and the democrats and some Republicans)!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24
The impressive thing about this result is that "the immigration bill" in the Senate went from "a done deal" to a "dead duck" in the space of 48 hours. I think that happened because the blogosphere, us included, got the people riled up and active.

Every now and again, we the people become the leaders and the politicians become the followers. There's a need for a lot more of that, these days.

P.S. I have an early primary for Congress in the 11th District of North Carolina, 2 May, less than a month away. Please visit my website in the tagline, and help however you can.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "The Ed McMahon Solution for Illegal Aliens"

5 posted on 04/08/2006 6:26:53 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24
Throw the Bums out! Every last one of 'em!

If they can't protect the American people and the Republic--throw 'em out and elect Congressmen who can--and will! There's plenty of talent among the American people!

Throw this worthless gang of self-serving deadbeats out of Washington!

Elect a Congress that will protect the U.S.A. and the American people!

6 posted on 04/08/2006 6:34:47 AM PDT by Savage Beast (9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush and his surveillance program.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

Just enforce the laws that are on the books.

Punish law violators who hire illegals. Prosecute them and force them to play by the rules.

No welfare, no free medical care and no schools for illegals.

Take away the incentive to come here by enforcing the laws already on the books.

Here's a suggestion - treat those illegals flooding across our Southern border the same way the Mexicans treat the Guatemalens flooding across their Southern border - aggresively patrol the border and throw back those that get through!


7 posted on 04/08/2006 6:38:23 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Life is too short to go through it clenched of sphincter and void of humor - it's okay to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

To get that, we'll need a third party. With members who will agree to sign a contract to abide by the platform that they were elected on or resign.


8 posted on 04/08/2006 6:40:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24
I can't read the entire story because it requires a login. However, I believe, from earlier posts this story may not tell the whole story.

As I understand it, Chuck Hagel & Mel Martinez presented a compromise version of the original McCain-Kennedy bill. This compromise was the version agreed on between the DimocRats and Pubbies. Jeff Sessions & Ben Nelson then presented an enforcement-only bill. Because of when their bill was presented it superseded the Hagel-Martinez bill. Bill Frist wanted the floor to vote on the Hagel-Martinez compromise so he sent the Sessions-Nelson bill back to committee. Both the Hagel-Martinez compromise and McCain-Kennedy bills were then turn down by floor vote by similar margins. NEITHER of these bills had much, if any, security features. Apparently, the Senate then voted on the Sessions-Nelson bill and voted it down also.

I too would like to see a roll call on all three bills; who voted for and against each. The first two only had one or two votes difference. Judging by the story, the third bill went down with similar margins (all but 2 democrats = 42 + 2 RHINO's = 44 leaving 36 or so for the bill).

If anyone on FR has the info it sure would be helpful. We can't let up on the pressure on this. The stories coming out about why the bills went down are face saving and don't indicate how much public pressure was put on the Senate. We can't let up on this now that they're going into recess.
9 posted on 04/08/2006 6:50:03 AM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The article actually says:

All but two Democrats and 20 Republicans voted against considering the border security-only bill

So, there were 20 Republicans who voted to allow a vote on this bill. The rest thumbed their noses at the majority of the American people who want increased border security.

You want the list of those with their thumbs in theor noses, not the 20.

10 posted on 04/08/2006 6:50:04 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

"Border Security Bill" is one way of putting it. I think "Amnesty Bill" would be more descriptive.


11 posted on 04/08/2006 6:52:20 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I can find the bill here under "Border Security" but they haven't updated the voting record that I could find.

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/b_three_sections_with_teasers/active_leg_page.htm


12 posted on 04/08/2006 6:55:59 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

Exactly!! Why can't the Feds understand that?


13 posted on 04/08/2006 6:57:39 AM PDT by Cricket24 ("We have met the enemy and it's the U.S. press (and the democrats and some Republicans)!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24
McLame and Drunk Teddy are deeply saddened...but hopeful and grateful for all the press this generated when they actually did NOTHING to help the American People secure their borders.
14 posted on 04/08/2006 7:03:53 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

Gee, what a surprise for a bunch of pandering poseur cowards who only give a damn about perpetuating their turn at the public teet. God forbid they do anything that might possibly indicate commitment to anything other than their own pet pork or some meaningless horse crap.



15 posted on 04/08/2006 7:10:16 AM PDT by MadJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

Senate kills border security bill?

I didn't know they were working on a border security bill. The only thing I've heard stressed in the senate over the last few weeks was how to keep the current crop of illegals and how to encourage more to come over.


16 posted on 04/08/2006 7:11:30 AM PDT by umgud (12 gauge, the original pepper spray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

" We can't let up on this now that they're going into recess."

You are right. I read a comment on one of the threads that this is laid to rest until after the 2006 elections, and then.... I think we are going to have to have a continuing, concerted effort reminding those willing to sell American citizenship that we will NOT ALLOW IT.


17 posted on 04/08/2006 7:19:26 AM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Including the felons, eh, guys?


18 posted on 04/08/2006 7:23:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cricket24

Neither the McKennedy, nor the limp-Frist bill addressed border security in any real way. Both were thinly-veiled attempts at amnesty.


19 posted on 04/08/2006 2:18:17 PM PDT by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson