Skip to comments.
Proposed smoking ban in bars, restaurants snuffed out in Michigan
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^
| 4/10/2006
Posted on 04/11/2006 6:18:17 AM PDT by SheLion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: RandallFlagg
21
posted on
04/11/2006 7:54:09 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Liberalism is a disease. FreeRepublic is the antidote. - Mindbender26, 3/29/2006)
To: SheLion
"they should be free to decide whether to allow smoking without intrusion from government."
Freedom wins another. Hopefully, more people are seeing through the lies.
Folks like you do a good job of collecting facts about the anti-smoker's true agenda.
Keep up the good work, Lioness!
22
posted on
04/11/2006 8:03:47 AM PDT
by
383rr
(Those who chose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
To: 383rr
Freedom wins another. Hopefully, more people are seeing through the lies.
Folks like you do a good job of collecting facts about the anti-smoker's true agenda.
Keep up the good work, Lioness!Thank you so much. But I am just a little cog in a mighty big wheel. Lots of ME's out there fighting this issue. Trying to protect the private business owners.
If we can't "run our stuff," why own anything at all? The damn government wants everything In Their Name Only.
Won't work!
23
posted on
04/11/2006 8:17:16 AM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: RandallFlagg
24
posted on
04/11/2006 8:29:51 AM PDT
by
gidget7
(PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
To: SheLion
To: RandallFlagg; SheLion
Nuke them with their hypocracy. Like in Colorado, there's bar owners arguing, "If SHS is so deadly, why ban smoking in OUR businesses and NOT CASINOS? HMMMM?"
They're suing. I hope they win.
I don't see any way they can lose, unless the judges are bought off. You can argue the point that it's discrimination against small business,by the casinos being exempt, or say that if it's REALLY about health, then casino employees are being discriminated against. Either way, it's discrimination.
26
posted on
04/11/2006 4:52:53 PM PDT
by
The Foolkiller
(BSXL* The year the NFL became irrelevant..)
To: The Foolkiller
I don't see any way they can lose, unless the judges are bought off. You can argue the point that it's discrimination against small business,by the casinos being exempt, or say that if it's REALLY about health, then casino employees are being discriminated against. Either way, it's discrimination.Casino's = money for the state
Seems that when it's for "the state," all's good. Anything else is mute. Or should be.
BS!
27
posted on
04/11/2006 6:37:27 PM PDT
by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson