Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina: House subcommittee passes cigarette tax hike
WSItv.com ^ | April 6, 2006 | Maggie Alexander

Posted on 04/11/2006 1:24:59 PM PDT by SheLion

A House subcommittee passed two bills Thursday morning that would increase the state's cigarette tax.

Kelly Davis is a spokeswoman for South Carolina Tobacco Collaborative.
Davis says the increase would help stomp out youth smoking, "A cigarette tax increase will first and foremost prevent thousands of young people from smoking, and current smokers to kick the habit."

One proposal would raise the tax by 32 cents with money earmarked for expanding Medicaid programs for low-income children.

The second proposal raises the tax by 30 cents, creating a trust fund that lawmakers would decide how to spend. It also would come with a corresponding reduction in state income taxes.

The bills now heads to the full House Ways and Means Committee, but it's already come farther than ever before, according to Davis, "It's really a historic victory. It's the first time free-standing cigarette tax bills have passed out of the subcommittee."

Similar legislation has previously failed on the Senate floor and in the full Ways and Means Committee.

South Carolina's seven-cents-a-pack tax is the lowest in the nation. Right now, the nationwide average price for a pack of smokes is about $4.12, meaning if you have a pack a day habit, you could spend nearly $50 or more a month.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; budget; butts; camel; caribou; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; epa; fda; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; pufflist; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Taxing smokers to carry the weight of the state on their shoulders.

25-30% of South Carolina's smoke, and now they have to carry the weight of the state budget. 

"creating a trust fund that lawmakers would decide how to spend." 

And I am SURE they will know what pet programs they want to spend it on, too!

1 posted on 04/11/2006 1:25:06 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; ...

This is sickening.

2 posted on 04/11/2006 1:25:55 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The second proposal raises the tax by 30 cents, creating a trust fund that lawmakers would decide how to spend. It also would come with a corresponding reduction in state income taxes.

Ah, yes, make the smokers pay for it.

Got a pet pork project? Heck YES we got the money!

3 posted on 04/11/2006 1:33:40 PM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

New Jersey taxes go up again this June for us polluters.


4 posted on 04/11/2006 1:37:08 PM PDT by rocksblues (Illegal Immigrant racist here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Increasing the tax burden to "Help" the payee. Yeah, right. (You know, politician's mothers should really have strangled them at birth.)

Here's what I'm doing: I bought a cheap, dorm sized refrigerator, a good quality cigarette rolling machine, a big, big box of filter tubes, and am filling the refrigerator with boxes and bags of high quality tobacco. (Taxes are minimal on bulk, internet tobacco at the present time.)

I plan to recoup my investment by selling product to friends and coworkers at about $10.00 per pack. (Make great Christmas presents.) Grandpa was a bootlegger so I come by it honestly.

By the time I'm finished with my "stash," organized crime will have established its black market cigarette operation along Prohibition lines. If people want to smoke, they're going to smoke.

I would have quit years ago if it weren't for the collation of "superior anuses" telling me I HAD TO. Lordy, how I hate social engineering. (I've already outlived a lot of those wise dickie birds too.)


5 posted on 04/11/2006 1:41:33 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Join me! Every night I pray for Global Warming . (And I think it's beginning to work.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I am a South Carolinian and just recently quit smoking. But this is a ridiculous tax. Just another example of blood thirsty revenue hogs. Why don't they tax alcohol more heavily? Or fast food? Or large vehicles? Or motorcycles? Or just about any damn thing else where they can make an excuse for.

It drives me up the wall that they act like they are doing society a favor. But is any of this money going to smoking cessation programs. Of course not. I think there should be a deceitful politician tax.


6 posted on 04/11/2006 1:42:34 PM PDT by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
The second proposal raises the tax by 30 cents, creating a trust fund that lawmakers would decide how to spend. It also would come with a corresponding reduction in state income taxes.

Makes me sick!  A trust fund so they can decide how to spend it!  What gall!

7 posted on 04/11/2006 1:44:38 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus
I would have quit years ago if it weren't for the collation of "superior anuses" telling me I HAD TO. Lordy, how I hate social engineering. (I've already outlived a lot of those wise dickie birds too.)

Amen to all of the above!

I am so sick and tired of these damn politicians.  And they aren't even embarrassed about setting up a pot for themselves.  Big fat idiots!

8 posted on 04/11/2006 1:46:57 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 04/11/2006 1:49:07 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat
It drives me up the wall that they act like they are doing society a favor. But is any of this money going to smoking cessation programs. Of course not. I think there should be a deceitful politician tax.

Here is how much South Carolina smokers already pay into the state economy:

Comparing Excise Taxes on Cigarettes, Beer and Wine

Number of six-packs of beer that must be sold in South Carolina to produce the same state excise tax revenue generated by one carton of cigarettes: 1.6

Number of bottles of wine that must be sold in South Carolina to produce the same state excise tax revenue generated by one carton of cigarettes: 3.3

South Carolina Smokers' Contributions to the State Economy - 2002

 

South Carolina smokers comprise only 26.0%1 of the adult population in the state. Here is what they already pay because they choose to buy a legal product:
Smokers Pay Excise Taxes2 $ 26,350,424
Smokers Pay Sales Taxes2 $ 61,245,850
Smokers Pay Tobacco Settlement Payments3 $ 84,085,377
  $ 171,681,651

10 posted on 04/11/2006 1:59:07 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChinaThreat

..."I think there should be a deceitful politician tax."


Now that would be a money maker and we, whom they serve, would have to figure out how to spend it - all of it and more so we could tax them more.


11 posted on 04/11/2006 2:02:32 PM PDT by mcshot (Rusty but trusty or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

For those who missed this:

House Judiciary approves restaurant smoking ban bill

COLUMBIA, S.C. - Smoking would be banned in South Carolina restaurants under a bill that is headed to the House floor.

The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday approved the legislation that bans smoking in all restaurant, bar, lounge and recreational facilities. The committee agreed to exceptions for cigar bars and private clubs, such as the American Legion.

The bill no longer has the criminal penalties it had when it came out of a subcommittee.

State Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Columbia, said the bill was about clean air and protecting the public, but some on the committee said it would put the state on a course to ban smoking in other places.

The proposal moves to the House floor.


12 posted on 04/11/2006 2:14:45 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcshot; ChinaThreat
..."I think there should be a deceitful politician tax."

Perfect! Sounds good to me!!

13 posted on 04/11/2006 2:14:50 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
For those who missed this:

House Judiciary approves restaurant smoking ban bill

What was the date on that?

South Carolina People Ban: SC Hilton Head

Local legislators agree that banning smoking in private establishments is a business decision, not a governmental one.
 
  Posted by samantha on Tuesday, February 14 @ 07:53:34 EST
( Read More... | 8397 bytes more | People Ban | Score: 5)
 
alt alt

alt   alt
  South Carolina Another Ban Failed: SC NO Ban for Florence City

Florence City Update
 
  Posted by samantha on Saturday, December 03 @ 09:47:22 EST
( Read More... | 3737 bytes more | Another Ban Failed | Score: 0)

14 posted on 04/11/2006 2:18:55 PM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus
Grandpa was a bootlegger so I come by it honestly.

My great grandmother was, too ;-)

I like your plan, in the greatest tradition of entrepeneurship.

Good luck, and I hope you get rich!

15 posted on 04/11/2006 2:19:13 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

I am from South Carolina and I think it is a great bill. I am for any bill that makes it harder for children to smoke cigarettes.


16 posted on 04/11/2006 2:30:16 PM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984
I am for any bill that makes it harder for children to smoke cigarettes.

Only parents can make it harder for children to smoke cigarettes. Would you like the state to take over parenting also?

17 posted on 04/11/2006 2:46:50 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

Fooor the Chiiiiiildren!

Always the last refuge of a scoundrel with an agenda!


18 posted on 04/11/2006 2:50:30 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Join me! Every night I pray for Global Warming . (And I think it's beginning to work.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
What was the date on that?

Apr. 04, 2006

House Judiciary approves restaurant smoking ban bill

19 posted on 04/11/2006 2:54:31 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
That is simply not true. Several forces can make it harder to smoke cigarettes in addition to parents. Government or the manufacturer can make it more difficult for children to smoke cigarettes by raising the price of the product. If they chose, Government could even make it more difficult by outlawing the product altogether, such as the case with drugs.

I do think Government has a responsibility to protect its youth from a product that undeniably causes cancer and other health risks and provides no benefit to the user. That's why drugs are outlawed. Would you like the state to legalize drugs?
20 posted on 04/11/2006 3:13:11 PM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson