Skip to comments.Gay Totalitarians Perverse Sex Education for Kids
Posted on 04/11/2006 2:50:17 PM PDT by little jeremiah
Gay Totalitarians Perverse Sex Education for Kids
In speaking of gay identity politics, Tammy Bruce noted that the Gay Gestapo is infuriated most when I declare that my sexuality is not an orientation but my preference.' Liberals are always shocked by her honest disclosures because the politically correct stance is that we are all born this way. The silliness of this claim, commented Tammy, reinforces the main lie in the Leftist worldthat none of us are responsible for our behavior, who we are, or what we become. This gay from birth angle also makes it easier to argue for special protections. The drive for special protections such as forced sensitivity and diversity training, speech codes, and hate crime laws requires homosexuality to be an identity, as opposed to just a sliver of who we are, said Tammy. Homosexuality is a behavior, noted Tammy, and there is nothing that makes homosexuals different from anyone else except behavior choices. Claiming a gay identity, declared Ms. Bruce, is nothing more than a slogan to excuse one self from personal responsibility and personal control. It is the ultimate in individual abandonment. (Source: The New American Revolution Tammy Bruce, pp. 234-235)
Identity politics are the evil spawn of group theory (Stalinism). As such, its a key element of multiculturalismthe weapon of mass destruction being used by the Left to demolish every trace of traditional America.
Gay identity politics is therefore, just one of the many weapons in the Lefts special rights groups arsenal. Consequently, gay identity is being used to destroy the traditional family as well as serving as a convenient excuse to separate children from their parents, thus enabling global village mind-conditioners to raise them. Its also a handy excuse for forcing straights into psycho political mind conditioning sessions, otherwise known as sensitivity and diversity training. Thanks to the publics naïve acceptance of the myth of sexual orientation queer activists are empowered in their agenda to eradicate our created condition as either male or female while simultaneously sensitizing Americans to accept something wholly unnaturalthe twisted notion that they are genderless beings possessed of an ever-expanding range of sexual orientations. Sexual Orientations are collectively referred to as a sexual continuum.
What is sexual continuum? Gloria Filax, of the University of Manitoba revealed that it refers to polymorphously perverse sex. In an essay revelatory of the masochistic Lefts subversive intentions she wrote, Chris Mayo argues that sex education would better serve children and adolescents if its practitioners attempted to disrupt foundational assumptions that children are (sexually) innocent. Filax pointed to the traditional family propped up by generational differences and heteronormativity (the new racism) as being the main problems which impinge on our classrooms. Using the reasoning of Alfred Kinsey, a sadomasochistic homosexual pedophile who declared that babies and children are sexual from birth, Filax stated that sexuality begins when a child is born and that sexuality is polymorphously perverse. Continuing on, Filax declared that, we must support Chris Mayos conclusion that schools have a responsibility to provide Ob/Scene education; that is, safe sex education. In a conclusion which clearly supports Ms. Bruces premise that gay identity is a slogan to excuse one self from personal responsibility and personal control, Filax declares, In this way we refocus ourselves in an age of HIV/AIDS as safely polymorphously perverse and control that which is deadlyHIV/AIDSand not sexuality. (Source: Ob/Scenely Polymorphously Perverse Sex Education, Gloria Filax, University of Manitoba, http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/97_docs/filax.html)
As Rush Limbaugh famously says: You just cant make this stuff up folks!
Be that as it may, its precisely this sort of total abandonment to depravity that leads to this sort of evil: a grotesque and disturbing pedophilic painting (was) prominently displayed (of) a baby boy lying naked on his back being sodomized by the nipple of a baby bottle. (Source: Turning girls into boys Peter LaBarbera, WorldNetDaily.com, Feb. 2002)
The American Psychiatric Association is in lockstep with the Gay Totalitarians polymorphously perverse agenda. In May of 2003, the APA met in San Francisco to debate the normalization of such paraphilias as pedophilia, transvestism, fetishism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism. Dr. Charles Moser of the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality pompously puffed: S/M practitioners have been victimized by society as a whole Of the utter derangement evidenced by the APA, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, President of the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) observed: Its a measure of how low the psychiatric establishment has sunk, that it would even debate the idea that pedophilia, transvestism, and sadomasochism could ever be expressions of true human flourishing. (Source: Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization Traditional Values Coalition)
The California Supreme Court is likewise aiding and abetting the Gay Totalitarians. In California Supremes: Oral Sex with Kids is OK! Kevin McCullough reported: On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court voted 6 to 1 to not force those convicted of having oral sex with underage kids to register as sex offenders. The majority judges said The law was too harsh and unfair. (Source: WorldNetDaily.com Mar. 10, 2006)
Goose-stepping under the Enlightenment banner: God is dead, therefore we are at liberty to self-actualize as we please, and to do whatever we want, criminally-minded Leftists for whom the most abhorrent erotic impulses serve as the mainspring of their lives, have taken command of our schools. In addition to dumbing-down American children, they are twisting their minds so as to condition them to hate their own country. Additionally, under the cloak of sensitivity and diversity training and sex education, Leftist deviants are grooming children to become degenerates and sex predators. This is one reason why America is experiencing a tidal wave of sex predation. Sex predators posing as teachers and other school administration officials are rutting on children and degenerate children are preying on other children.
Reading reports such as the following have become all too common in America: Ive never experienced the problems and the degenerate actions of kids as I have this past year, said bus driver Bob Baxley of Hagerstown, MD who has been driving buses for 12 years. (Source: As School Bus Sexual Attacks Rise, Danger Often Overlooked, staff writers, washingtonpost.com, June 14, 2005)
The New Totalitarians
Repressive regimes of the past required that all people be submissive to state power. The totalitarianism of socialism differs in that not only does it force complete submission (annihilation of the autonomous individual) but it demands internal assent, meaning that freedom of conscience is criminalized.
Gay Totalitarians and their accomplices have seized control of our schools and they brook no interference or dissent from parents or anyone else for that matter. This was made clear by the arrest of David Parker, a father who sought to protect his young child from being indoctrinated by Gay Totalitarians. (www.article8.org). Their hateful intolerance is likewise evidenced by the nonstop slash and destroy campaign being waged against Brian Camenker, Scott Whiteman and the Parents Rights Coalition of MA. Theyve just been informed that a 6-year old lawsuit against them is being revived. Chief among their crimes is that they dared to expose to the public the stomach-churning, sadomasochistic content of The Little Black BookQueer in the 21st Century. (ibid) This abhorrent filth was distributed by the Gay and Straight Education Network (GSLEN) to hundreds of teens at Brook School, Brookline, MA, April 30, 2005. Additionally, the accused are guilty of exposing that the Gay/Straight Alliance in collusion with MA. Dept. of Education employees had instructed children as young as 12 in a variety of sadomasochistic acts, including the grotesque act known as fisting. (Depraved Fistgate Incident here: http://www.massresistance.com/docs/issues/fistgate/massnews.html)
An army of cultural Marxists is waging war against America. They have one aim: Total destruction of our civilization. Among the many organizations making up this treacherous army are: National Organization of Women (NOW), Gay and Straight Alliances, the American Civil Liberties Union, NAACP, Jesse Jacksons Rainbow Coalition, Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), Code Pink, and the National Educators Association (NEA). These are but a few of many.
The New Totalitarians house of cards is built from liesbig lies, little lies, lies of omission and lies of commission. The antidote to lies and the liars who tell them is Truththe blunter the better. As noted by Tammy Bruce, the Left is always shocked by her blunt truth. Doubtless they are frightened as well.
Antonin Scalia is another truth-teller who recently sent Leftist liars into a tailspin. In a recent speech he was asked about gay issues. His refreshingly honest response was: Question comes up: is there a Constitutional right to homosexual conduct? Not a hard question for me. Its absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct. Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years. Easy question. (Source: 365Gay.com)
Its time for Truth to become fashionable in America once again. For much too long liars have made lying chic. So let us begin with these most fundamental of truths: You shall not bear false witness. We are men and women made in the image of God. We are not polymorphously perverse chimps.
About the Writer: Linda Kimball is a writer and author of numerous articles and essays on culture, politics, and world view. Linda receives e-mail at LindyKimball@msn.com.
There is nothing worse than destroying the innocence of children.
One for both lists.
Just pinging a few of you to an article for discussion. Overview of homosexual/pansexual indoctrination of children in schools.
International Academy of Sex Research Joins the Debate: Is Pedophilia a Mental Disorder?
In a recent issue of the Archives of Sexual Behavior--the official journal of the International Academy of Sex Research--some clinicians argue that "unusual sexual interests" should not be considered mental disorders.
Bruce Rind, author of the 1998 meta-analysis that claimed to find little or no harm in man-boy sex, joins the discussion; other commentators disagree.
By Linda Ames Nicolosi
The Archives of Sexual Behavior published a special edition in December 2002 to discuss whether pedophilia should remain a mental disorder.
Opening the debate was Richard Green, M.D., J.D. a widely known writer specializing in homosexuality and gender-identity issues. Green argued in favor of removing pedophilia from the diagnostic manual (DSM).
Green was one of the clinicians who, in the 1973, took the side of gay activists to argue for removing homosexuality from the diagnostic manual...
This gay from birth angle also makes it easier to argue for special protections.
So a gay person says 'I've always felt this way'. But when they were young, could anyone actaully tell? Who gets to decide who's gay and when it matters that this information be known, for this special protection and sensitivity training. At kindergarten? Pre-school? Elementary school? The idea of sexualized grade school kids and pre-schoolers is creepy. Most don't understand what sexuality is (other than giggling at 2 adults kissing) and lack the ability to fully understand. Will there be a committee to examine toddlers for signs of 'gayness' as perceived by these new liberators and then gayness is assigned?
As a former student of psychology, I personally think that for a very small percentage, there is a genetic component but for most others, learned behaviors, often through reinforcing opposite gender roles at critical ages are the causes. But I question the 'gay' sides' motives when someone can only 'discover' they've been gay all along, but apparently a gay person cannot discover they really prefer being straight without 'needing counseling' to combat the guilt they feel at being gay. (I will find the quote for this...)
Riled up! I'll be back later... need to step away from this machine for a spell.
Thanks for the ping lj.
"...there is a genetic component ..."
Are you implying there actually exists a "gay gene" ,and
it has been found ?
They don't want to indoctrinate every child ... just yours!
No, not what I meant at all, I guess I was rather vague. Not a gene, but rather a gender issue like someone with certain chromosonal issues such as XXY that definitely affect hormones and gender specific traits. Not a gene. Actually more like a chromosonal disorder. Again pointing more toward disorder rather than the order of a gene. Or hermaphrodites, who aren't necessarily gay or bi, but who are challenged with two, often incomplete, sets of reproductive organs. And even then learned behaviors are often in play.
I'll buy this, as long as they're willing to accept that I was born with a propensity to own guns. 'Gun owner from birth', you might say (and my mom still complains about that front sight).
"Gay Totalitarianism" is a pretty good term, although I would prefer "Homo Totalitarianism."
I'll buy this, as long as they're willing to accept that I was born with a propensity to own guns. 'Gun owner from birth', you might say (and my mom still complains about that front sight)
I love it! LOL!! Now just conjure up your very own 'cultural narrative' in order to 'authenticate' your 'orientation."
The fruits of the work of Theodore Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse. Straight from the Frankfurt school agenda.
This agenda is 100% supported by the ACLU.
Hey, don't hold back; no need to tiptoe through the tulips. Tell us how you really feel, you're among friends.
Sad to say, you are absolutely correct.
I am still a bit optimistic because there are a lot of people that also feel this way.
My added working commentary on the fallacy subjects of "orientation" & "gay rights" (feel free to provide criticism and input):
Sexual Orientation -- What about Religious Orientation?
Like religion, homosexuality is subjectively determined and declared -NOT objectively determined and confirmed via some objective scientific test. If one feels they are a homosexual and declares they are -who can disagree with them? Who can objectively identify a homosexual person? If those that declare homosexuality become a protected class or exceptional class of individuals warranting extra 'rights' above and beyond those already afforded all human beings THEN what is to prevent everyone from claiming the socially rewarded, prized, and critically acclaimed homosexual status?
Can one imagine a court case on the issue -how can one prove or disprove homosexuality -the basis for all this stuff the leftists are pushing? This reality begs the legal question of sexual "orientation" presumption that at one time was based upon reality e.g. genetalia and now would go unanswered by the new world leftist spectrum of subjective gender premise. The question: in essence will society choose homosexual until proved heterosexual OR heterosexual until proved homosexual? Curious minds want to know? LOL
Now, if homosexual activity was suggested as a test to prove homosexuality then who could prove they would choose to engage in homosexual activity -how do they prove it; must they actually engage in and document homosexual activities to prove homosexual status? Very odd the attempt to equate homosexual status as an innate state of being independent from the only thing that differentiates it from the norm of heterosexuality when considering that heterosexuals are heterosexuals even if remaining celibate virgins.
Should rights be based upon sexual feelings or even more on sexual activities that must be proven? It is a fact that feelings are subjective. Consequently, how can any rights be derived from something subjective? In fact, 'buying into' the subjective argument by default implies that rights are given to individuals arbitrarily by the State and as such can be taken away arbitrarily by the State. The whole 'feelings' argument kicks our Founder's recognition of unalienable rights which is basis for our Independence, Union, and Constitution to the curb...
YES -the whole 'feelings' argument guarantees that rights are and will be always subject to the whim of those 'in charge'... How bizarre is it to seek a goal with an argument that if accepted actually nullifies the goal? This is the way of the left...
The homosexual portion of the culture war debate is not about rights -it is all about homosexual sex. Homosexuality is subjectively determined and or declared -NOT objectively determined or declared. I myself can not objectively identify a homosexual person -hence stereotypes are meaningless as are any anecdotal 'things' e.g. 'knowing one or many homosexuals (those you may 'feel are homosexuals or those who may feel they are homosexuals or those who may declare they are homosexuals). One can not rightly judge the heart of an individual; however one can judge an activity.
Assuming people are not animals driven by instinct -that people possess an authentic freedom to choose what they do or do not do (unless they suffer some disorder) THEN one can come to but only one objective and rational conclusion. As to homosexuality -truly, it is ONLY sexual activity one chooses to engage in that objectively differentiates homosexual from heterosexual -regardless any subjective 'feelings'...
If one truly understands the subjectivity versus objectivity arguments then one should see clearly the fatally flawed premise underlying subjectivity arguments for homosexual 'rights' and anyone should easily realize that subjectivity flies directly in the face of establishing any objective 'homosexuality' rights or pursuing any objective 'homosexuality' discrimination claims or even objective claims that there is a hatred of homosexuality using the much espoused homophobia meme that some in this discussion indignantly cite.
Legislation and or social mandate regarding just versus unjust discrimination with subsequent social fostering reward versus social penalizing can only be legitimately based upon objective innate characteristics e.g. race and or constitutionally guaranteed activities e.g. religion.
Religion is a constitutionally guaranteed activity -homosexual sex is not. If homosexual sex was guaranteed by the Constitution then I would suggest that at a maximum it would not be mandated, at a minimum like religion there would be the misinterpreted yet very applicable separation clause e.g. a separation of Sex & State... One would not see mandated public school 'indoctrination' of "homosexuality is normal or a valid option" stuff being mandated upon children by judges or homosexual agenda activist groups...
Judges that attempt to create or groups that advocate for special rights above and beyond already realized human rights advocate for these special rights premised upon either a totally subjective self-declared 'orientation' or ones choice of sexual activities. The advocates and judges are simply plying a smoke and mirrors approach in attempt to hoist homosexual activity into acceptance under the guise of providing human rights to individuals already possessing such human rights.
Case in point: US Federal, State, and Local Government entities at this time both set aside contracts and give preference on contracts to minority business owners. I can state unequivocally that 'homosexual' business owners will never be afforded such favor. Answering why I can make such an assured observation quickly gets to the root of the matter and completely knocks down the card house that homosexual agenda proponents attempt to erect...
Wipe the froth from your chin