Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie

Of course not, they're "secret" but verified but unnamed sources.
"Their actions and findings were described to a Washington Post reporter in interviews with six government officials and weapons experts who participated in the mission or had direct knowledge of it.
None would consent to being identified by name because of fear that their jobs would be jeopardized. Their accounts were verified by other current and former government officials knowledgeable about the mission."


65 posted on 04/11/2006 9:56:56 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill
I see. The Washington Post is hyperventilating because a report sent from Iraq 2 days before the President mentioned the trailers in a speech drew a contrary conclusion. These Junk Media people are idiots. Do they have ANY clue how many "reports" the Govt generates? Thanks for bringing this up, for-warned is for-armed.
67 posted on 04/11/2006 9:59:39 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (In the end it does not matter if you win. All men die. What matters is how you lived. No surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson