[NormsRevenge]

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad greets the attendants of a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran. Iran's hardline leaders fired off a barrage of vitriolic attacks against the United States and Israel, voicing "serious doubts" over the Holocaust and predicting the "elimination" of the Jewish state.(AFP/Behrouz Mehri)

[Ninian Dryhope]

Time to tear them a new one.

[al_again]

This is a real problem. The Iraqi conflict has sapped the US will for action when necessary. If the US or Israel don't take action soon, it will be too late. This is a much bigger threat than Iraq ever was!

[quark]

Iran: The world's next parking lot.

[CWOJackson]

Ringo?

[llevrok]

I would not be surprised that, as we wast time worrying about our inability to deal with these jerks, spec/ops is about 1/2 way to Tehran waiting for the "go" signal.

[Frank_2001]

Yahya, yadda yadda. Eat Shiite, General.

[surely_you_jest]

Bold talk for a Persian faggot.

[bill1952]

Although they remind me of this guy, it is clear that these dudes do not fear us.

[COUNTrecount]

Separated at birth?....

[Logical me]

If we take this nut out he wouldn't be around to enjoy it. He needs to be reminded that if we go this one, there will be no Iran unless it is taken over by the Iranian insurgents.

[Snickersnee]

General Safavi seems to share an opinion widely held among Iranian bigwigs, to wit: that if Israel or the US strikes at Iran, every Shiite in Iraq will spontaneously rise up and crush the American Army there.

I wouldn't bet the masjid on it, myself.

[Doogle]

..don't let your alligator mouth write a check your parakeet a$$ can't cover

[You Dirty Rats]

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council demand. In Tehran he said that after three years of investigations Iran's activities were "still hazy and not very clear."

Hazy and not very clear? No wonder the Iranians laugh at the UN and the West and don't take us seriesly. Their actions are as crystal clear as their words.

[robowombat]

These clowns should think about this. Next year is not an election year. Pres. Bush does not have to be concerned with his own reelection. There is planty of time to mass the air and naval and SF resources necessary to undertake a true lighting war. Not a raid, a war just waged with few boots on the ground and many layers of missiles, precision weapons, and some technological improvements in weaponry that should keep Persia in the dark ages literally for a long time. These people have no idea what they are bringing down on their heads and they are too arrogantly cock sure that their 'American always runs away' model in conjunction with the oil weapon is unbeatable.

But be ready for soaring gas prices unless we wall off strikes on the oil industry as we systematically shred Iranian defense and nuclear capabilities.

[wizardoz]

Presumably we could start a bombing campaign that wouldn't involve ground troops at all.

[sgtbono2002]

If wars were won with words these guys would be fearsome.

[Integrityrocks]

Wouldn't you just love to walk up to that idiot and say, "Oh just shut up already." Sheesh

[PAMadMax]

OK, wisea**, couple of one-megaton MIRV's and a dose of neutron bombs courtesy of the B-2 squadron and this p*ssant and his ilk are toasty....

[atomic_dog]

Time to finally do away with Executive Order 12333 and smoke check this dude and his cabal.

[slowhand520]

I see this a bit differently. I can see a three pronged strike on Iran, Syria and Al-Sadr. The Iranians reaction to any attack would not be conventional. I believe it would be to unleash Hezbolah on Israel and US forces (using Al Sadr as a proxy) in Iraq. I also believe our special forces are in Damascus and Tehran right now pin pointing targets and maybe providing money and support to anti-government forces and in southern Iraq monitoring Mooky Al Sadr. A US/Israeli strike is the most likely scenario. This is my opinion. But then again I am just a St. John's University grad.