Skip to comments.
Iran’s top general warns of “crushing response” to attacks [...increases global warming.]
Iran Focus ^
| 16APR06
| Iran Focus
Posted on 04/16/2006 3:22:51 PM PDT by familyop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: ASOC
"I would guess this guys last comment on Earth will be "What's that noise?"
I think it would be more like "What's that noi,....Ka Boom!"
21
posted on
04/16/2006 5:19:35 PM PDT
by
garyhope
To: familyop
These guys are such trash-talking douchebags that Saladin must be spinning in his grave. Or sand dune. Whatever.
To: garyhope
IT would be the "snik" sound the retarders make as they open on a MK 84
23
posted on
04/16/2006 7:29:49 PM PDT
by
ASOC
(Choose between the lesser of two evils, and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
To: PeteB570
In the Iran/Iraq war it was islamogarbage vs. islamogarbage. You're talking about a gang fight. I'm talking about war.
To: rageaholic
All Iran was really able to manage with Iraq was a standoff. We whipped the Iraqis quickly. I don't think they would last very long
Our first squadron of F22s are available and would guarantee air dominance almost immediately. They can also fly through Iraqi air defenses at will (more stealth than F117). The B2 won't be stopped by their air defenses.
From the air we can control them at will.
We have forces to their east, to their west and our Navy is to their south. Again, we control the chess board.
I suspect that if we attack, it will not be an invasion, but it also is not likely to be limited to nuclear capability. I suspect any attack will result in destruction of their missile sites, air force bases, runways, naval facilities and ships, etc. In other words we won't let them retalitate by striking ships in the Gulf of Hormuz.
25
posted on
04/16/2006 8:13:01 PM PDT
by
jdluntjr
To: familyop; All
Baghdad Bob's cousin, Tehran Tom...
26
posted on
04/16/2006 8:15:38 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: familyop
I'm confused.
If they just have nuclear capability for POWER, not for WEAPONS, what are they going to 'annihilate' anyone with?
In one mouth-foaming speech, they just want nuclear energy.
In the next they're threatening to strike with means they don't have?
OY. We don't want to kill him- we just want to make him kosher!lol
27
posted on
04/16/2006 8:18:54 PM PDT
by
ClearBlueSky
(Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
To: ClearBlueSky
"OY. We don't want to kill him- we just want to make him kosher!lol"
Who? The Iranian General? ...vaporize him, then remove his molecules from the air? That would only clean the space that he occupies. I am a person of the nations (AFAIK so far), but even I know that he could not be made kosher. So there you have a Noachide decree. [Little humor there!]
28
posted on
04/16/2006 8:53:25 PM PDT
by
familyop
("The Romans and their Empire were but a bauble in comparison to the Jews." --President John Adams)
To: rageaholic
You said something about "run away".
I didn't say how well they would do it, just that they have the capacity to die moving forward in great numbers.
Islamic nations could field good armies except that their dictators require obedience and loyalty in their generals and senior leaders, not ability.
The modern battlefield is high tec, complex and fast. Our military forces rule in all three. But we must not sit on our backside as somebody, China, just might pass us by.
29
posted on
04/17/2006 3:32:04 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson