Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India rejects US nuclear deal condition
NDTV.com/ OutlookIndia.com ^ | Monday, April 17, 2006

Posted on 04/17/2006 2:21:15 PM PDT by Gengis Khan

India rejects US nuclear deal condition

NDTV Correspondent

Monday, April 17, 2006 (New Delhi):

India has rejected a US condition that it will end nuclear cooperation if New Delhi tested a nuclear device.

The clause was included in a US draft agreement on civil nuclear cooperation between the two countries.

India pointed out it has already announced a voluntary moratorium on nuclear tests.

India and the United States reached the deal during a visit by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to Washington last July. It was signed when President George Bush visited Delhi in March.

Under the deal, New Delhi agreed to separate its civil and military nuclear units and allow international inspection of civil nuclear facilities.

For its part, the United States agreed to cooperate with India's nuclear energy needs.

http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?slug=India+rejects+US+nuclear+deal+condition&id=86984&category=National
 
 
India says no to US bid to put cap on its nuclear testing
NEW DELHI, APR 17 (PTI)

India today rejected US proposal for a cap on its nuclear testing saying such a provision has no place in a proposed bilateral agreement.

New Delhi, however, made it clear that it was committed to the unilateral moratorium on further tests.

A draft agreement sent by the US stipulated several elements one of which said cooperation will be discontinued if India were to detonate a nuclear explosive device.

"In preliminary discussions on these elements, India has already conveyed to the US that such a provision has no place in the proposed bilateral agreement and that India is bound only by what is contained in the July 18 Joint Statement, that is, continuing its commitment to a unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing," External Affairs Ministry spokesman Navtej Sarna told reporters when asked about the American proposal.

"The US had shared with India some weeks ago a preliminary draft agreement on Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation under Article 123 of the US Atomic Energy Act," he said.

India's position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is well-known and continues to remain valid. New Delhi maintains that it will sign the treaty only if it is universal with all countries dismantling their nuclear arsenal.

Under the July 18, 2005 Joint Statement, India and the US are to negotiate a bilateral pact for trade between the two countries in hi-technology material and technology. The bilateral deal, which is to be negotiated separately, will provide a framework under which the US companies can cooperate with Indian nuclear establishments, including supply of uranium fuel.

The US is hoping to have annual trade worth millions of dollars through this agreement.

India has already presented a plan to separate its civilian and military nuclear facilities on the basis of which the Bush administration is seeking change of US laws. The legislation in this regard is currently being debated in the US Congress.

The July 18 was clinched on March 2 during the visit of US President George W Bush, also makes it incumbent on India to negotiate a safeguards agreement with the IAEA.

In the July 18 Joint Statement, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh conveyed that India would reciprocally agree to be ready to assume the same responsibilities and practices and acquire the same benefits and advantages as other leading countries with advanced nuclear technology, such as the United States.

These responsibilities and practices include signing and adhering to an Additional Protocol with respect to civilian nuclear facilities; continuing India's unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing and working with the US for the conclusion of a multilateral Fissile Material Cutt-Off Treaty.

The US President, in turn, committed to seek agreement from Congress to adjust US laws and policies and that the US will work with friends and allies to adjust international regimes to enable full civil nuclear energy cooperation and trade with India.

 
http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=378490


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india; indianukes; nucleardeal; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2006 2:21:17 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan


In all honesty...the US should really start testing nukes again...at least a few. There is some rumbling in the sceintific community that despite advanced computer modeling. Nothing quite beats testing.


2 posted on 04/17/2006 2:55:06 PM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan
India today rejected US proposal for a cap on its nuclear testing saying such a provision has no place in a proposed bilateral agreement.

But... are we still getting the mangoes?

3 posted on 04/17/2006 3:12:09 PM PDT by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

They are pawns of russia anyhow.


4 posted on 04/17/2006 3:14:19 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

With todays software is actually 'lighting-one-off' even necessary anymore?


5 posted on 04/17/2006 3:14:25 PM PDT by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

And Musharraf is a pawn of the US - everything balances.


6 posted on 04/17/2006 7:15:16 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (A pessimist is what an optimist calls a realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Not really India is a a member of the SCO along with the rest of the goons.


7 posted on 04/17/2006 7:26:39 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
Not really India is a a member of the SCO along with the rest of the goons.

Southern College of Optometry? Scottish Chamber Orchestra? Throw me a frickin' bone here.

8 posted on 04/17/2006 7:39:50 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (A pessimist is what an optimist calls a realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

India has 1 billion people to protect. I can't see stopping them from testing a nuke.

Other that wasting a bomb they might need of other uses!!


9 posted on 04/17/2006 7:46:01 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Yeah, India which will have the worlds fourth largest economy and third most powerful military after the US and China by 2025 is a pawn of Russia. Maybe you had a point in 1976 but not in 2006.


10 posted on 04/17/2006 8:03:44 PM PDT by voreddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Just because we assert whatever is in our national interest we become pawns of Russia?


11 posted on 04/18/2006 1:22:38 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME; Oztrich Boy

Wrong. India (along with Pakistan) have observer status in the SCO, not members. In case of Pakistan, which is also an observer in the SCO, I don't suppose you hold it against them since they are your ally.


12 posted on 04/18/2006 1:34:21 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is a regional alliance of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

Mongolia, Pakistan, Iran and India have the observer status.

http://news.uzreport.com/mir.cgi?lan=e&id=8884


13 posted on 04/18/2006 1:40:12 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces
In all honesty...the US should really start testing nukes again...at least a few. There is some rumbling in the sceintific community that despite advanced computer modeling. Nothing quite beats testing.

I agree - at a minimum you need a few tests to confirm the modeling accuracies. But I'd also like to see some larger-yield new design work done. I fear we are going to need them someday.

14 posted on 04/18/2006 1:48:02 AM PDT by Heatseeker (Never underestimate the left's tendency to underestimate us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html

Train some more Iranian troops in India. Yeah we know a counter NATO alliance is being formed against the west.


15 posted on 04/18/2006 8:17:25 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

I didn't find any mention of India training Iranian troops anywhere in the article.

Instead I found this:
"Absorbing new member states needs a legal basis, yet the SCO has no rules concerning the issue. Therefore, there is no need for some Western countries to worry whether India, Iran or other countries would become new members."

And the last time I checked we voted against Iranian nuclear program. Honestly I dont understand the big chip on your shoulder against India.


16 posted on 04/18/2006 10:22:28 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

I like India but I dont like the way they try and play both sides against the middle.That is a recipe for no allies. Yes last week I read an article about them training iranian troops in India and Condi Rice said it concerned her.


17 posted on 04/18/2006 12:27:48 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
Yes last week I read an article about them training iranian troops in India and Condi Rice said it concerned her.

i watched condi on c-span. she actually called the reports misleading. she made a distinction betweeon training iranian troops versus port calls by iranian ships. incidentally iranian ships visit the UK and Italy among other countries.

there is a lobby in the press and congress that is opposed to Pres.Bush and his nuclear deal with india. this iran report is intended to scuttle that deal

18 posted on 04/18/2006 7:43:21 PM PDT by The Lion Roars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME; The Lion Roars
I like India but I dont like the way they try and play both sides against the middle.That is a recipe for no allies. Yes last week I read an article about them training iranian troops in India and Condi Rice said it concerned her.
 
You read half baked reports from your media thats trying to whip up the anti-India frenzy to stall the Indo-nuclear deal with false and malicious allegations very much typical behaviour of your lying media and corrupt Congressmen. The Iranian troop and Iranian navy allegation was made by a demmocrat Congressmen Tom Lantos who was against the deal right from the begining.
http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/mar/31ndeal3.htm
 
http://www.gg2.net/viewnews.asp?nid=3933&tid=breaking_news&catid=Breaking%20News
 
http://web.mid-day.com/news/world/2006/april/134365.htm
 
And this is what Condoleezza Rice has to say about the allegation :
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/05/india.iran.rice/index.html
 
 Read this and get that chip off your shoulder:
http://news.indiainfo.com/2006/04/04/0404iranian-navy.html
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060404/wl_nm/india_usa_iran_dc
 

19 posted on 04/19/2006 1:11:57 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

I have no chip. I just know that India at present can not be trusted like say the UK.


20 posted on 04/19/2006 5:27:50 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson