First Ted Kennedy, now Specter? Im beginning to think that Specter needs that economics lesson as much as the liberals. I'm sending my disagreement with this policy to Specter, the GOP, my Florida representatives, and the White House.
Our party has no ideas and its really sad.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: ritewingwarrior
Specter is such a damned idiot.
2 posted on
04/24/2006 6:40:23 AM PDT by
TomServo
To: ritewingwarrior
Now Specter???
Who the heck is next? 007?
He could always deal with Specter very well.....
To: ritewingwarrior
Specter said that after the chief executives of top oil companies testified in Congress last month, he has co-sponsored legislation that would, in part, "make the OPEC countries, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela and the other countries, subject to our antitrust laws." The man's stupidity knows no bounds ...
4 posted on
04/24/2006 6:40:52 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: ritewingwarrior
This is so Congress can gouge us.
5 posted on
04/24/2006 6:43:22 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: ritewingwarrior
"They get together, reduce the supply of oil, and that drives up prices," he [Specter]
said. Quite the accusation. If he could prove collusion, I would be in favor of some sort of punative measures. Without that, however, it is wrong to confiscate corporate profits based on market forces outside of their control. This is especially true if the government bears a lot of responsibility of this mess due to past pacification of despot regimes, over regulation, and a failure to exploit domestic resources.
6 posted on
04/24/2006 6:43:50 AM PDT by
edpc
To: ritewingwarrior
I'm beginning to think that Specter needs that economics lesson as much as the liberals. Specter isn't the only Republican that needs a lesson. Just wait a few minutes and see the responses you get right here.
7 posted on
04/24/2006 6:44:04 AM PDT by
mc6809e
To: ritewingwarrior
Yep, that's right tax em, that'll solve the problem.
8 posted on
04/24/2006 6:45:24 AM PDT by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: ritewingwarrior
Adding ANOTHER tax will make gas prices out down??
HEY CONGRESS ... How much are YOU collecting from these gas/oil taxes for YOUR pet projects???
9 posted on
04/24/2006 6:45:36 AM PDT by
Mo1
("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
To: ritewingwarrior
I'm torn on this issue. I'm for free market, I'm for free enterprise, I also recognise that the economy is based on the price of fuel. It affects EVERYTHING.
10 posted on
04/24/2006 6:45:42 AM PDT by
sandbar
To: ritewingwarrior
No, Spector has a point, but he just doesn't go far enough.
We should extend this to other examples of "windfall" profits.
Sometimes, the price of lettuce and cucumbers at my local grocery store will double, all in the space of one week. Obviously, there is collusion and price-gouging going on. We need to do something about Big Produce. Right, Arlen?
11 posted on
04/24/2006 6:45:50 AM PDT by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: ritewingwarrior
12 posted on
04/24/2006 6:46:17 AM PDT by
stevio
(Red-Blooded Crunchy Con, American Male (NRA))
To: ritewingwarrior
16 posted on
04/24/2006 6:47:54 AM PDT by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: ritewingwarrior
It's the government that reaps a windfall tax on gasoline now.......
the big oil companies want to reinvest their profits in new wells, refineries and expanded services which would create thousands of new high-paying jobs....
But all the insane Congress can think of is higher taxes.
I remember when Bush 41 was duped to go along with higher luxury taxes in 1990....
They nearly destroyed the boat building business.....
If you want less of something...tax it!
If you want more of something....reduce the taxes on it.
20 posted on
04/24/2006 6:53:12 AM PDT by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
To: ritewingwarrior
Okay, I considered it. Found the idea stupid. Next topic, please.
22 posted on
04/24/2006 6:57:23 AM PDT by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: ritewingwarrior
They should reinstate profit regulation on motor fuels.
To: ritewingwarrior
Just another excuse for the government to get their hands on other people's money.
26 posted on
04/24/2006 7:01:54 AM PDT by
JamesP81
To: ritewingwarrior
The per barrel cost of oil is up because of speculative traders, come down on them and the price of oil drops.
27 posted on
04/24/2006 7:02:33 AM PDT by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: ritewingwarrior
Senator Sphincter, spare us your musings.
29 posted on
04/24/2006 7:04:34 AM PDT by
hgro
To: ritewingwarrior
Dear Sen. Specter: I pay my federal, state, and local governments in taxes TWICE what the oil companies get in profit off a gallon of gas.
WHO'S gouging?!
32 posted on
04/24/2006 7:08:51 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: ritewingwarrior
"They get together, reduce the supply of oil, and that drives up prices," he said.They've got a funny way of doing that, Arlen.
There are 248 MORE drilling rigs operating in the US today than this time last year. How exactly does that reduce supply?
33 posted on
04/24/2006 7:09:54 AM PDT by
Dog Gone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson