Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Tangible proof' al-Qaida deploying nukes (Bombshell presentation)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 4/25/06 | WorldNetDaily.com

Posted on 04/25/2006 6:50:43 AM PDT by demkicker

A terrorism symposium featuring leading experts will begin with presentation of "tangible proof" al-Qaida not only has developed an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons but also has begun to deploy them for use in its jihad against the United States and Israel.

Paul L. Williams, author of "The Al Connection" and "The Dunces of Doomsday," will present his findings at the National Press Club in Washington at the conclusion of a public debate with Wall Street Journal correspondent Richard Miniter on al-Qaida's nuclear weaponry.

The debate, Friday at 10 a.m., will be moderated by Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard and regular contributor to the Fox News Channel. The public is invited to attend.

The organizers say the event is timely, "with increased anxiety over demands for a pullout from Iraq, the nuclear developments in Iran and North Korea, the failure of our government to secure the borders and our country's fledgling, incomprehensive effort at homeland security."

Epstein believes the majority of Americans disapprove of both the "cut-and-run policy" proposed by many leading Democrats and the "compassionate conservative" approach of the Bush administration, favoring instead a "firm and decisive military action with no apologies to Russia, China, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia or the United Nations."

"I am convinced that the threat we are currently facing from radical Islam greatly surpasses that which was posed by the Third Reich," Epstein said.

Anyone interested in attending, Epstein added, should contact America's Truth Forum at its website or by calling 866-709-3474.

The event offers the following speakers (continued):

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: alarmist; americanhiroshima; area51; artbell; chickenlittle; cluelessfarah; coasttocoast; conartist; debkafiles; farah; farahanutcase; loosenukes; paulwilliams; scamartist; suitcasenukes; symposium; terrorism; tinfoil; ufoabductions; wingnutdaily; wnd; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-272 next last
To: LurkingSince'98

"So what if they then get nuked, don't you see they still win. What you think rationally as them losing, they see as winning. They have NOTHING to lose we have EVERYTHING to lose."

Exactly, they don't give two *hits about their population, just like how Mao felt about a nuclear war with the West. To them, it is their obligation under the law of the Koran to destroy the infidel. The EU will not be spared from this horror either, particularly France, Spain and England. Most of the people in the West want to duck their heads in the sand like in WWII and hope it goes away. Bush has indeed done a horrible job on domestic issues, but I know that 90% of his effort and energy goes into preventing this calamity, even at his own legacy. Too bad the rest of America doesn't get it...


101 posted on 04/25/2006 11:55:48 AM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig

exactly right!

Lurking'


102 posted on 04/25/2006 11:57:48 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig

exactly right!

Lurking'


103 posted on 04/25/2006 11:57:49 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig

exactly right!

Lurking'


104 posted on 04/25/2006 11:57:51 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

sorry, sorry, what caused that?


105 posted on 04/25/2006 11:58:45 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

"cascading cross defaults"

I don't know anything about CCD so I can't comment intelligently. However, I suspect that during a crisis there are ways to bypass or nullify a bank default, essentially run the economy in safe mode to allow people to obtain necessities. After the initial crisis the system would be sorted out. That's my guess fwiw. So do you have alot of cash stashed away or plan to bug out somewhere?


106 posted on 04/25/2006 12:03:46 PM PDT by BadAndy (Islam is a religion of submission. YOUR submission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

"What would be your first thought when it happens, right after where are the kids and are they safe? It would be:food, water, shelter and MONEY.

You and 100 MILLION other citizens think AT THE SAME TIME, I need to get some cash."

Our paper and liquid money will be worthless instantaneously. Food, water and shelter indeed be the imminent priority. Most of the casualties will come from the lack of medical supplies, food & water from these cities.


107 posted on 04/25/2006 12:05:11 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig; Southack; RightWhale
Our paper and liquid money will be worthless instantaneously

That's a fairly broad statement. Ultimately, doesn't the US economy depend strongly on consumer confidence? If enough folks in the US say "we won't accept any US currency for transactions anymore", that's a big step.

108 posted on 04/25/2006 12:10:26 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
A terrorism symposium featuring leading experts will begin with presentation of "tangible proof" al-Qaida not only has developed an arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons but also has begun to deploy them for use in its jihad against the United States and Israel.

"Tangible proof" would be one of the weapons themselves.

109 posted on 04/25/2006 12:12:30 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy

I have some cash, plus small amounts of Silver and Gold.

But, and it's a biggie, when things are going from bad to worse, having and good supply of food, water and necessities
(a small generator), firewood, firearms, ammo, small wood burning stove, good security system all sure go a long way to insuring survival.

gold, silver and cash may not do much for the short haul.

PLAN ON HUNKERING DOWN FOR A WHILE.

Lurking'


110 posted on 04/25/2006 12:13:28 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
they had the ability to hijack an airplane years ago, but they waited and planned, I believe documented five years or more to carry it out at the right time, so they could hijack multiple planes and drash into multiple targets simultaneously.

OK, they wait, and they wait, and they wait...

...and the bombs fizzle because their components have decayed.

111 posted on 04/25/2006 12:13:45 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; potlatch; Interesting Times; Grampa Dave; dixiechick2000; Victoria Delsoul; ...




112 posted on 04/25/2006 12:14:07 PM PDT by devolve ((----Kimberly Guilfoyle - bicoastal or another thespian?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

"What could end the US, is if Russia and China decided to take the opportunity to divide the world amongst themselves. We are the ONLY obstacle to them. Islam is simply the useful idiots, the equivalent to early 20th century anarchists."

Right. Russia and China need to try and invade us, they only have to cripple us while they conquer countries around them. Russia could be the air/ICBM force and China supplies the ground troops. They do conduct joint exercises these days.


113 posted on 04/25/2006 12:15:18 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig

I believe you are exactly right.

someone lights off several nukes on us and the country will be a bad and sad place to live for a generation if not more.

Lurking'


114 posted on 04/25/2006 12:15:24 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

no we discussed this earlier, we are NOT talking about samm russian suitcase nukes which are DEAD.

we are talking about real low yield nukes made during last year or three using current technology passed around by AG Kahn from Pakistan to everyone in the Arab world.

Lurking'


115 posted on 04/25/2006 12:18:40 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

Sadly, only after a few months we would be right back to the PC garbage, amensty for illegals, entitlements for seniors, NBA, NFL, NHL, MLB, 50 Cent, Hollyweird, etc.

I really don't think it would make much of a difference in the long term since the liberal mental disorder has seeped so deep for so long.


116 posted on 04/25/2006 12:20:49 PM PDT by chris1 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

Think Reconstruction.


117 posted on 04/25/2006 12:21:37 PM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
we are talking about real low yield nukes made during last year or three using current technology passed around by AG Kahn from Pakistan to everyone in the Arab world.

In other words, nice, big clunky devices that aren't man-portable.

Nuclear weapons need periodic maintenance. The notion that they have a ten-year shelf-life, where one can simply leave it lying around unattended, is just silly. "Current technology" does not change the nature of nuclear materials, electronics exposed to ongoing nuclear decay, or explosives exposed to ongoing nuclear decay.

118 posted on 04/25/2006 12:23:22 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog

yes and defending your own turf.


119 posted on 04/25/2006 12:23:44 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

The only reason I don't think they have nukes yet is because they have not used them.

Because of the shelf life, and their desire to kill us immediately, I would assume as soon as they get them they will try to kill us and not take the chance of it not working.


120 posted on 04/25/2006 12:27:55 PM PDT by chris1 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson