Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Griffin: 2011 Earliest for New Spaceship (if additional funding for NASA is provided)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/25/06 | Suzanne Gamboa - ap

Posted on 04/25/2006 6:07:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - A new spaceship could be ready to replace the nation's aging shuttle fleet by 2011 — three years ahead of schedule — if lawmakers added money to NASA's proposed budget, the head of the space agency told a congressional panel on Tuesday.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said that date is the earliest the new spaceship, or crew exploration vehicle, could be developed no matter how much money the agency received.

Currently, the target date for building a new vehicle is 2014.

With his pitch to Congress, Griffin underscored a point he has made previously about completing the spaceship on a faster time frame.

Pressed by Sen. Bill Nelson (news, bio, voting record), D-Fla., Griffin acknowledged an additional $1 billion could accelerate the program's completion.

The shuttle is to be retired in 2010, and lawmakers are concerned about when a replacement will be ready.

"If money were not an issue — going back to Apollo kinds of days — then I think it would be no technical problem to have an operational system available in five to six years," Griffin said after testifying before a subcommittee that oversees NASA spending.

President Bush's budget calls for a 3.2 percent increase in NASA spending over last year. The House and Senate have authorized an additional $1.1 billion, but that is only a guide. The money must be appropriated by both chambers.

A Senate appropriations subcommittee was to scheduled to meet Wednesday to consider the proposed increase.

NASA will be shelving its three aging space shuttles in four years. The next generation of spaceships is supposed to carry astronauts to the moon by 2018 and eventually to Mars.

The so-called "flight gap" between the shuttles and their replacement could affect research and American space competitiveness, lawmakers said.

"We don't want a hiatus because we think that puts us in a security risk position," said Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2011; earliest; michaelgriffin; nasa; shuttle; spaceship; spaceshuttle

1 posted on 04/25/2006 6:07:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Ping


2 posted on 04/25/2006 6:15:59 PM PDT by annie laurie (All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

3 posted on 04/25/2006 6:20:27 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

add me to the ping list, please


4 posted on 04/25/2006 6:21:53 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
that puts us in a security risk position," said Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison

There is an outspoken minority on FR who do not comprehend this.

5 posted on 04/25/2006 6:28:11 PM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There is an outspoken minority on FR who do not comprehend this.

Count me in on that "minority." How is a "gap" in our ability to send NASA astronauts into space a security risk? If it is, why haven't we been attacked (by the grays, or the Vogons, or whoever the risk comes from) during the past three-plus years, when we've only managed to muster up a single Shuttle flight?

6 posted on 04/25/2006 8:00:43 PM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
I think the only "security risk" involved here is job security at NASA JSC and that is what concerns JSC contractors, who pull KBH's strings to make her make such silly statements.

Of course it will really be embarrassing if the commercial guys manage to field an orbital manned vehicle prior to NASA's favorite contractors getting their CLV/CEV abomination off the drawing board. Especially when they do it for far less than NASA is asking to merely speed up their program.
7 posted on 04/25/2006 8:52:52 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Good call. :')


8 posted on 04/26/2006 1:51:25 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
Count me in on that "minority."

Done

9 posted on 04/26/2006 8:02:58 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson