Posted on 04/26/2006 12:06:21 AM PDT by Lorianne
Like many other universities, Ohio State Universitys branch campus in Mansfield, Ohio has a First Year Reading Experience program, through which the school chooses a book for all incoming freshmen to read. The book is chosen by a committee that includes both faculty and library staff.
One of the members of this was Scott Savage, the head reference librarian at OSU Mansfield. Scott is a Plain Christian, a conservative Quaker who eschews most forms of modern technology, rides a horse and buggy, and endeavors to live a simple and quiet life. As a Quaker, Scott believes in nonviolence, and that evil and injustice should not be fought with the weapons of this world. His opponents on the committee made the mistake of assuming that because of this pacifism, Savage would be easily overwhelmed on the issue before them and that once his friendly persuasion had failed he would retreat into silence and acquiescence.
The other members of the committee initially recommended a variety of leftist works, a mixture of scholarly books and casual reads (such as titles by Jimmy Carter and Maria Shriver) for incoming freshmen. Scott objected to the one-sided nature of the list and suggested a less overtly political book, Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. After this suggestion was rebuffed, he suggested four more books, all reflecting mainstream conservative opinions: David Horowitzs The Professors, It Takes a Family by Rick Santorum, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis by Baat Yeor, and The Marketing of Evil by David Kupelian.
The reaction to these suggestions was swift and outrageous. The Marketing of Evil particularly angered some of the professors because it advances a traditional Judeo-Christian view of sexual morality. One professor, J.F. Buckley, responded to Scotts suggestion with a public allegation (through an e-mail to the OSU Mansfield faculty and staff) of harassment:
As a gay man I have long ago realized that the world is full of homophobic, hate-mongers who, of course, say that they are not. So, I am not shocked, only deeply saddenedand THREATENEDthat such mindless folks are on this great campus. I am ending now, with the hope that I have seriously challenged you Scott, and anyone who thinks as you purport to do. You have made me fearful and uneasy being a gay man on this campus. I am, in fact, notifying the OSU-M campus, and Ohio State University in general, that I no longer feel safe doing my job. I am being harassed.
In other words, Scott Savages very existence on campusthe way he thought and viewed the world-- made Professor Buckley fearful at work. Given the absurdity of that allegation, one might think that others on the committee would have introduced a note of sanity to the discussion. But this was not the case. In fact, the other professors immediately jumped to the support of Professor Buckley, and fellow faculty bmember Dr. Norman Jones recommended that the matter be brought before the schools faculty association.
On March 13, 2006, after much discussion, the faculty association of OSU Mansfield voted without dissent to forward the issue of Scott Savages incorrect thinking to a sexual harassment investigator of the university. Whether out of conviction or cowardice, not one faculty member stood up to defend obviously protected speech. Not one faculty member stood up to defend academic freedom. Not one faculty member voted to stop a slanderous and false allegation. Not one faculty member voted against a motion to punish a librarian for suggesting a book.
At the University of Colorado, 199 professors signed a public petition to ask the Board of Regents to stop all investigations of Ward Churchill, including a plagiarism investigation that was unrelated to Churchills offensive (though certainly constitutionally protected) speech. To those professors, free speech was so important that it justified protecting a controversial professor even from plagiarism allegations. At Ohio State Mansfield, though, the faculty slandered a librarian for exercising the same academic freedom rights as other members of his committee.
So, in the name of academic freedom, leftists like Colorados Churchill must be protected even from actual legal violations (like plagiarism) when they celebrate the September 11 death of American fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters. Yet in the name of that same academic freedom, these same leftists can punish conservatives merely for suggesting books that offer a traditional Judeo-Christian perspective on sexual morality.
This episode in the heartland of red state America shows yet again how deeply the culture of Leftism has penetrated the daily workings of our universities.
David French is the Director of the Alliance Defense Funds Center for Academic Freedom.
Such universities are worse than useless, they are dangerous and should be shuttered! America's youth would be better served by becoming self-taught!
The universities were taken over by commies and queers decades ago.
Look up the John's Committee (Florida) and you will find a line regarding the Florida university system "It's full of Commies and queers".
Entropy assures one that things have gotten worse. Alas, one's fears were realized.
Savage is proof that the quiet way of the Society of Friends is still quietly helping Americans realize and deal with issues of importance.
I would surmise Professor Puffter Buckley is very insecure with his faggotry, as he should be.
What a twink.
FMCDH(BITS)
Oh brother.
It is simply legal and explicit threat of the use of force to prohibit speech or thought that the politically correct (in this case the gay professor) disagree with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.