Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran threatens to strike at US targets if attacked [Yes, again.]
Reuters ^ | 26APR06 | Alireza Ronaghi

Posted on 04/26/2006 12:23:30 PM PDT by familyop

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran vowed on Wednesday to strike at U.S. interests worldwide if it is attacked by the United States, which is keeping military options open in case diplomacy fails to curb Tehran's nuclear program.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made the threat two days before the U.N. nuclear watchdog reports on whether Iran is meeting Security Council demands to halt uranium enrichment.

Iran says it will not stop enrichment, which it says is purely for civilian purposes and not part of what the United States says is a clandestine effort to make atomic bombs.

"The Americans should know that if they assault Iran their interests will be harmed anywhere in the world that is possible," Khamenei was quoted as saying by state television.

"The Iranian nation will respond to any blow with double the intensity," he said.

Washington, backed by Britain and France, has been pushing for sanctions if, as it expects, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports that Iran has flouted U.N. demands.

But Russia and China, the U.N. Security Council's other two veto-holding permanent members, oppose any embargo.

Iran's nuclear energy head, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, held talks with IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei in Vienna on Wednesday.

"The talks were encouraging," Mohammad Saeedi, deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, told Reuters, adding the two sides discussed ways to resolve outstanding issues with the IAEA. He gave no details.

NO TIME

But a Vienna-based diplomat said before the meeting it would be too late to alter decisively the IAEA report, due to be submitted to the Security Council by Friday, because inspectors would not have time to verify issues.

"All ElBaradei can do is note any information received and say he could not assess whether it was significant," said the diplomat, who asked not to be named.

ElBaradei visited Tehran this month but his proposal that Iran "pause" enrichment was rebuffed, diplomats have said.

British Foreign Minister Jack Straw sought to enlist China's backing on Wednesday, saying Beijing should use its growing diplomatic muscle to solve disputes with international partners.

"China's support for this goal, as a permanent member of the Security Council, has been valuable already and will be increasingly crucial in securing international consensus in the face of Iran's intransigence," Straw said in London.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Tuesday it was time the Security Council drafted a Chapter 7 resolution.

This would be binding under international law and could lead to sanctions or even military intervention, although another resolution would be required to specify either step.

In response to the U.S. refusal to rule out military action, Iran has warned Washington that its forces in the region were vulnerable. Iran's war games in the Gulf this month were widely seen as a veiled threat to a vital oil shipping route.

"The security of the Persian Gulf is very well tied up to the world's economic affairs and it would be quite natural for Iran not to sit idle vis-a-vis any military adventure," Iranian legislator Alaeddin Broujerdi told reporters in London.

IRANIAN VOW

Iran said on Tuesday it would suspend relations with the IAEA if sanctions were imposed. Diplomats said this could mean withdrawing from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday reiterated his view Iran could review its NPT and IAEA commitments if it saw no dividends from abiding by international protocols.

"We hope they fulfil their duties and make it unnecessary for the Islamic Republic of Iran to reconsider its relations with them," Ahmadinejad said.

Although Iran says it bases nuclear policy on the NPT, it pulled out of the treaty's Additional Protocol -- which allows snap inspections of atomic facilities -- in February after the IAEA referred its nuclear file to the Security Council.

Iran often says it does not benefit from the NPT's entitlement to shared technology, but Western diplomats say it must prove its goals are peaceful to qualify for this.

The IAEA has said that after three years of investigation it still cannot confirm that Iran's aims are entirely peaceful, although it has found no hard proof of a military program.

The agency points to gaps in its information, such as the status of Iran's research into P-2 centrifuges that can enrich uranium faster than the P-1 units it now operates.

(Additional reporting by Parisa Hafezi in Tehran, Mark Heinrich in Vienna and Katherine Baldwin in London)


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bravado; chestpounding; chestthumping; iran; nuclear; on; terror; terrorism; war; weapons; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2006 12:23:32 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop

All these guys do is threaten us! How do they find time to do anything else?


2 posted on 04/26/2006 12:24:06 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

...some downplaying in the piece, BTW, and written from a British perspective.


3 posted on 04/26/2006 12:25:25 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1621806/posts CNN Version
4 posted on 04/26/2006 12:26:06 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Maybe Iran will back down after being attacked, but because of these threats I have always said we have to be prepared to defeat them outright and effect regime change. After we defeat Iran I don't think there is a major state sponsor of terrorism left standing.


5 posted on 04/26/2006 12:26:24 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Let them attack. That would give us the PERFECT excuse to strike back hard.

Maybe the left in this country would finally understand what these islamists are up to.
6 posted on 04/26/2006 12:27:16 PM PDT by BMC1 (Democrats are STUCK ON STUPID, MASTERS OF DECEPTION AND CULTURE OF TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"The Iranian nation will respond to any blow with double the intensity," he said.
______________________________________________________


Nuh uh....we triple dog dare ya.


7 posted on 04/26/2006 12:27:37 PM PDT by MadeInAmerica (- If ILLEGAL means Undocumented - Then Breaking and Entering means Unannounced Visit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I won't be really scared until they threaten to roast our bellies in the fires of hell.


8 posted on 04/26/2006 12:30:38 PM PDT by Maceman (Hey! Who changed my tagline? (Fake but accurate, and now double-sourced))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Syria still is a major state sponsor of Terrorism. But with 4 of 5 out of the way, Syria just might do it's own cleanup.


9 posted on 04/26/2006 12:30:52 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

"If, if America doesn't stop falsely accusing us of making nuclear weaponry with our completely peaceful nuclear power generation capabilities, we're gonna NUKE THEM!!"

Yeah. That's a pantsload of intelligence right there. Can we attack them for being stoopid?


10 posted on 04/26/2006 12:33:07 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Let's hear what they have to say after Mr. Ahmadinejad is turned into a radioactive cinder.


11 posted on 04/26/2006 12:34:52 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

They've been behind attacks against us since 1979, Our embassy, they fund Hezbollah, how many attacks do you need?


12 posted on 04/26/2006 12:37:03 PM PDT by E.Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

When I think of British perspective I immediately recall the episode of Band of Brothers where the fine English chap advises the US grunt that he couldn't possibly fire a blind shot through a building to get to an imaginary tank. Of course the imaginary tank ends up utterly destroying Mr. political correctness.


13 posted on 04/26/2006 12:37:54 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen

On could surmise were skeered. What else can it be. These monkeys have been flinging poo at us in earnest since the late 70's. Guilty conscience? I don't get it.


14 posted on 04/26/2006 12:38:48 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen
I know all that and I don't need any more reasons. I'm speaking to the STUPID LEFT in this country who refuse to believe these Islamists are dangerous and need to be KILLED.

The left in this country think if they are nice to Islamists, they won't attack us. They don't know how wrong they are.

It must be that government schools education they received that they don't know history.
15 posted on 04/26/2006 12:40:39 PM PDT by BMC1 (Democrats are STUCK ON STUPID, MASTERS OF DECEPTION AND CULTURE OF TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop

How about we just negate their air defenses and let Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, et al do the actual strikes.


16 posted on 04/26/2006 12:41:03 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

He had already said he had 40,000 people in the western world planted to become homoside bombers when he calls for it.
That tole me he already declared war by having his troops in our country already.

Time to assasinate the guy, he declared war already by what I hear.
Bin Laden did this with Clinton who did nothing. We need to learn from that lesson.


17 posted on 04/26/2006 12:42:01 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
Hey, Iran, listen...

On 9/12, we knew that the people that attacked us were loosely scattered, hard to find, and didn't per se belong to any one country. So it took us a while to develope someplace in middle east where we could slowly draw them in over time, pulled by their fanatical and stupid devotion to a cause that they were willing to die for, and oblige them.

Before you come knocking around our neighborhood making a lot of noise, you crazy old windbag, remember...we know where you live. Two words, Ayatollah...green glass.

18 posted on 04/26/2006 12:45:28 PM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

I just pray to God (the real one) that all this comes to a head in the next two years. If the cards fall wrong and America continues going back to sleep on the couch, then the next guys will send Iran flowers and candy and beg them not to hurt us again.


19 posted on 04/26/2006 12:47:02 PM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
I personally think they are waiting for President Bush to be out of office before they attack.

They understand by now the ramifications if they attack us now. However if a democrat win the election, the Islamists will have a hay day.

Islamists don't believe the democrats will protect this country or go after them anymore than I do.
20 posted on 04/26/2006 12:53:53 PM PDT by BMC1 (Democrats are STUCK ON STUPID, MASTERS OF DECEPTION AND CULTURE OF TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson