Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"
Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J

In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.

Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.

The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 4kooks; alqaedanukes; artbellstuff; globaljihad; hamadmir; iran; irannukes; iranstrikes; jihadinamerica; nukes; rightalk; terrorists; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-614 next last
To: Sender

You said -- "IMHO, one thing that bin Laden and the crazy Iranian and others have in common is the return of the Mahdi, the 12th imam. They would save 'the big one' to fit into that prophecy somehow."

That may very well fit into what I have heard talked about. It's that the mosques in this country (and in Canada) are collecting a lot of data about our facilities in the U.S. and how to disrupt the entire country. They've got their "base of operations" in every mosque in the country. They will stage their attacks from every mosque when the *signal* comes from the Middle East.

Right now they are collecting information. They are assimilating it. They are getting ready for an all-out-push to invade Israel (at the right time). And they intend to eliminate the state of Israel and kill all the Jews.

To preven the U.S. from coming to Israel's aid -- they will launch a thousand simultaneous attacks here in the U.S. (do you remember what a couple of "shooters" did on the East Coast?)

They will also pull out the big weapons -- some WMD (maybe nukes, maybe biologicals). The size and scope of the attack will paralyze the U.S. -- the Muslims (and associated countries) will launch their attacks upon Israel to eliminate it -- and we'll be scrambling around here -- in this country -- just to survive and root out all the terrorists who are sleepers here -- right now.

It will be a massive internal fight here in this country -- going on for a long time -- before we overcome them. In the meantime, they are hoping to have accomplished the "final solution" for Israel and killing all the Jews (and also killing them here in the U.S. too, while they are at it).

That's what I've heard their long-range plan of action is.

They're just waiting for the right time to launch the invasion and the attack upon the U.S.

Regards,
Star Traveler


381 posted on 04/28/2006 12:58:03 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: conservative physics
And I don't remember any enraged jews over the loss of their temple.

You need to review your history, for to state off the cuff as you have that the Jews weren't 'enraged' over the loss of the temple is completely incorrect. The destruction of the temple in AD 70 greatly enraged the Jews who infact fought a tremendeous battle to prevent Rome from doing that in the first place. However, the Roman army was overwhelming and extremely brutal in their conquest that it forced Jewish anger underground until the Bar Kochba rebellion in AD 132 at which time the Roman army brutally crushed the opposition.

382 posted on 04/28/2006 12:58:25 PM PDT by Godzilla (The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

Comment #383 Removed by Moderator

To: Southack

Understood. So if someone walked one across the desert open border, it may show up on a satellite infra red photo but by then wouldn't it be too late? By the time an analyst saw it and get some action the thing could be in Dayton.

For a drone to pick up an emitted gas, it would have to be "droning" overhead at that exact moment. Do we have drones constantly patrolling the entire Mexican border 24/7?


384 posted on 04/28/2006 12:59:20 PM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: conservative physics

And there are no Jews today because of it?

Sorry, guys. I respectfully disagree with you.

IMHO. Focus should be placed on the following.

1. Secure the damn borders so we can better track who is comming and going.

2. Drastically increase the budget for humit that was literally destroyed by Clinton.

3. Use humit to identify those muslims who are actively engaged in terrorist activity or the teaching of it.

4. Take them out. No matter where they are.


385 posted on 04/28/2006 12:59:40 PM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Southack

You said -- "History is also full of disasters due to people over-estimating their enemies...a mistake as fatal or more so than under-estimating them."

This is *one specific area* where I would prefer to overestimate them -- when it come to my borders in my country and my city in which I live. I'll take overestimation -- thank you...

Regards,
Star Traveler


386 posted on 04/28/2006 1:00:09 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

"That's kind of like killing the cancer in the body by removing only half of it (or whatever percentage). You're trying to get the cancer completely out of the body. That's the goal. "

Your answer to removing the cancer is to kill the body?


387 posted on 04/28/2006 1:00:55 PM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Americans will use Thermo Nuclear weapons if terrorists use nuclear weapons on Americans.
388 posted on 04/28/2006 1:02:34 PM PDT by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

You said -- "However, the Roman army was overwhelming and extremely brutal in their conquest that it forced Jewish anger underground until the Bar Kochba rebellion in AD 132 at which time the Roman army brutally crushed the opposition."

Yeah... like that. That would work for the Muslims...

Regards,
Star Traveler


389 posted on 04/28/2006 1:03:25 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

Would you of have approved of bombing the Soviet Union?


390 posted on 04/28/2006 1:05:13 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

I agree with the idea of them taking a long view of history, however, the nuke mystic is way to much to pass on. Exterminating Israel is their reason for being. Let's just say they must execute their 'Prime Directive'.

If they had a nuke it would be past tense because they would have loaded it into the first white Toyota pickup they could find, and set it off as close as they could get to the 'EEEVIL JOOS'.

Now, the second one is a different story, that would have our name on it.


391 posted on 04/28/2006 1:05:16 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

You said -- "Your answer to removing the cancer is to kill the body?"

If you're referring to the "Muslim body" (i.e. "Islamic religion") -- then yes, that would work for me.

If you're referring to the "body" being the rest of the world -- removing the cancerous Islam would improve the health of the world.

Regards,
Star Traveler


392 posted on 04/28/2006 1:05:48 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Sender

"They would save 'the big one' to fit into that prophecy somehow."

Agreed.


393 posted on 04/28/2006 1:07:36 PM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

You asked -- "Would you of have approved of bombing the Soviet Union?"

I've never advocated the nuking of various cities or countries because of Islam. What I advocate is the destruction of their *holy sites* and *shrines* that give them the *basis* and *legitimacy* for their religion. And then make the religion just as illegal as Nazism is over in Germany. It's an evil and false religion.

Regards,
Star Traveler


394 posted on 04/28/2006 1:08:14 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

That just makes me want to give a muslim a great big hug ;^)

(that gives me a clear shot at his kidneys with my gerber)


395 posted on 04/28/2006 1:10:52 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Southack

You said -- "What surprises me, however, is that you bought his nonsense about gun assemblies not needing triggers, Tritium being a trigger, or whatever else it was that he said that you defended as being correct."

"Big Boom" is "Big Dead" -- triggers or no triggers.

What more do you need to know?

Regards,
Star Traveler


396 posted on 04/28/2006 1:12:21 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Ours


397 posted on 04/28/2006 1:12:54 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

You said -- "If these loons had this capacity they would have used it long ago."

Well..., it goes like this. (1) Bomb exists, (2) Terrorist have desire to get bomb, (3) Terrorists have money to get bomb, (4) at some point, terrorists get bomb, (5) bomb goes "boom", (6) you're dead...

Regards,
Star Traveler


398 posted on 04/28/2006 1:16:28 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

We couldn't do that here anyway, profiling an all.


399 posted on 04/28/2006 1:16:55 PM PDT by NAVY84 (The path of least resistance for Democrats is TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
""Big Boom" is "Big Dead" -- triggers or no triggers. What more do you need to know?"

No trigger means...no big boom. You can get an explosive fizzle, not much more.

400 posted on 04/28/2006 1:20:53 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson