Skip to comments.
How the Apostasy Debate Played in the Islamic World
Catholic Exchange ^
| April 29, 2006
| Fr. Samir Khalil Samir, S.J.
Posted on 04/29/2006 6:27:32 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Father Samir was born in Egypt and lives in Beirut, Lebanon. He is one of the foremost Christian experts on the Islamic world.
1
posted on
04/29/2006 6:27:36 AM PDT
by
NYer
To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping List Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
Eastern Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
04/29/2006 6:28:59 AM PDT
by
NYer
(Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
To: SJackson
3
posted on
04/29/2006 6:30:02 AM PDT
by
NYer
(Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
To: NYer
Glancing through the comments, one can see that around 50% uphold Rahmans execution because this is what the Sharia [Muslim law] says. For at least one out of four of these, the essential reason for the death penalty for apostates is: if conversion to another religion is allowed, this would be fitnah (sedition), it would prompt others to follow this path, and thus all would become Christians. To halt this trend, which is not considered normal, it is better to kill. The concept of fitnah is Koranic (mentioned more than 30 times in the Koran) and it often justifies violence. All would become Christians? Father Samir's interpretation, or Muslim thought?
Mrs VS
To: NYer
Stop Jihad Now!
What if they gave a Jihad and no one came?
Jihad is NOT the answer
etc.
The messages above seem to be missing from the looney left.
5
posted on
04/29/2006 6:59:13 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: NYer
In the '60s and '70s, there was a wave of socialism and this also failed and ended with the advent of the '90s. In Islamic countries, opposition always tended more toward the right; it upheld that Islam is always and by nature socialist. Even these ideologies failed. Sociallism as such, may have failed, but the underlying philosophy, Collectivism, has only become more resolved. Every move made by suicide bombers and such, are always "For the Greater Good", be that Islam, their tribe, Nation or whatever. Collectivism has always called for the sacrifice of self to others, no matter what the cost, because in a collectivist's eyes, the "group's" survival and well being outweigh the needs and rights of any individual in the system.
6
posted on
04/29/2006 7:02:36 AM PDT
by
morque2001
(Life is a tragedy for those who feel, and a comedy for those who think.)
To: NYer
7
posted on
04/29/2006 7:19:25 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(May 1st: Be warned businesses, I'm making a list and checking it twice.)
To: NYer
... people no longer know what the true Islam is, they dont know what to believe in because there are so many interpretations of each faith element. Well they better start making up their collective one billion minds and start making some tough decisions and deal with it. I would be happy if they would simply stop killing innocent people and blowing things up.
I'm sick to death of Islam. Period.
To: NYer
"For at least one out of four of these, the essential reason for the death penalty for apostates is: if conversion to another religion is allowed, this would be fitnah (sedition), it would prompt others to follow this path,
and thus all would become Christians."
I too am unclear as to whether this is emphasized by the people making the comments, or whether this emphasis has been added by the author of the article, who comes from a Christian point of view.
In my view, a cult that has to prohibit conversions from it on pain of floggings, persecution, or death is not winning people's hearts and minds (or souls). Hence, a ripe opportunity for evangelization.
You know, things really haven't changed all that much in 2000 years. Substitute "ayatollah" for "Nero", and we're talking pretty much the same kinds of mentality. If we Christians are to emerge triumphant in all this, it will probably be through implementation of strategies similar to those employed by the early Christians.
9
posted on
04/29/2006 7:25:08 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(Lord Jesus Christ, son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: RKBA Democrat
If we Christians are to emerge triumphant in all this, it will probably be through intervention of the great Triune God.
11
posted on
04/29/2006 7:29:18 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: VeritatisSplendor
One of the Afghani Imans said something to that effect.
If the Apsotate was deported, then many others would follow, so they could go to the West as well.
12
posted on
04/29/2006 7:39:11 AM PDT
by
Sometimes A River
(Bush stifles speech to appease Chinese butchers)
To: NYer
For at least one out of four of these, the essential reason for the death penalty for apostates is: if conversion to another religion is allowed, this would be fitnah (sedition), it would prompt others to follow this path, and thus all would become Christians.I bet that the one in four doesn't at all realize what that opinion says about Islam itself.
13
posted on
04/29/2006 7:40:10 AM PDT
by
agrace
To: Acts 2:38
"One of the Afghani Imans said something to that effect.
If the Apsotate was deported, then many others would follow, so they could go to the West as well."
That's the lure of the world, not Christianity. Maybe for them it's the same thing. Seductions and corruptions of the West = Christianity.
Mrs VS
To: NYer
We Arabs say Islamic countries agree about one thing only: that they dont agree among themselvesThere's a slight 'disagreement' going on in Sudan right now.
15
posted on
04/29/2006 7:46:46 AM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: DManA
16
posted on
04/29/2006 8:06:23 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(Lord Jesus Christ, son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
To: RKBA Democrat
I know. I often have to remind myself that He is in charge.
17
posted on
04/29/2006 8:14:55 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: VeritatisSplendor
It was God himself that chose to give man his free will to chose , and Islam tries to take this from any man. How can one not see that this is pure evil? To force a "religion" upon a man?
18
posted on
04/29/2006 8:25:14 AM PDT
by
tessalu
(t)
To: DManA
If WHEN we Christians are to emerge triumphant in all this, it will probably be through intervention of the great Triune God.
19
posted on
04/29/2006 8:27:27 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Purple Fingers Rule!)
To: NYer
"Leaving Islam would be a step backwards into error.
These guys are certified Nutjobs.
Its basically the civilized, intelligent world against the savage, idiotic world.
20
posted on
04/29/2006 8:37:20 AM PDT
by
observer5
("Better violate the rights of a few, than of all!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson