Skip to comments.
Saddam Hussein, Misunderstood (NY Times Alert)
NY Times ^
| April 30, 2006
Posted on 04/29/2006 5:41:26 PM PDT by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
04/29/2006 5:41:27 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
It's always so sad when a murderous butchering dictator gets misunderstood.
To: jmc1969
ROTFLMAO.......LOL....hahahahahahaha.... ahhhhhh, LOL.....those paper reporters, they are a hoot.
To: CWOJackson
Not according to the documents being translated by one particular FReeper...
4
posted on
04/29/2006 5:44:07 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: jmc1969; EternalVigilance; fieldmarshaldj; Old Sarge; Proud_USA_Republican; ...
THIS IS TOO FUNNY!!!!!!
I'm remembering that song from the 1970's, "OH, LORD, PLEASE DON'T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD!"
5
posted on
04/29/2006 5:45:29 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Bob Taft for Impeachment)
To: jmc1969
"In the months leading up to the Iraq war, Saddam Hussein did try to cooperate with United Nations inspectors"
Bull. He was just stringing them along. This was just the latest in a pattern of attempts to stall action by the UN.
6
posted on
04/29/2006 5:47:12 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: jmc1969
I don't believe a single word the Times says on this subject.
To: popdonnelly
Leave it to the NYTimes to come to the aide of Saddam! Unbelievable.
8
posted on
04/29/2006 5:51:19 PM PDT
by
Laverne
To: jmc1969
The NYT.....Batboy Central...
9
posted on
04/29/2006 5:53:08 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: jmc1969
addam Hussein, Misunderstood
Why stop with Saddam?
Why not use that good old revisionist history on Hitler, or Lenin, or Stalin, or Mao or, Attilla, or even the Devil?
Evil is so misunterstood these days!
10
posted on
04/29/2006 5:53:15 PM PDT
by
adorno
To: Clintonfatigued
"1970's"
60's. The Animals.
11
posted on
04/29/2006 5:53:25 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(Illegal immigration 24/7, the GOP ain't making it 24/7.)
To: Clintonfatigued
And yet, to the troglodytic numbnut retards at the Slimes, Bush is a BAD, BAD, BAD, BAD, BAD man !
12
posted on
04/29/2006 5:54:15 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: fieldmarshaldj; xcamel
This is just too funny!
It's impossible to be offended by something that's so ludicrous.
To: jmc1969
I'm a mental retard and soil myself at the bus station. Can I get a job writing for the New York Times?
FMCDH(BITS)
14
posted on
04/29/2006 6:00:16 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: jmc1969
If we truly had a president that believed in America & our freedoms he would have shut this traitorous newspaper down along with CNN etc.He today would then be carring a 65% approval rating.... but we got a fake/fraud conservative who is beholden to these crapola elites.
15
posted on
04/29/2006 6:04:26 PM PDT
by
Digger
To: jmc1969
Gosh, even Hans Blix was complaining about Saddam's restrictions.
More NYTimes revisionism.
16
posted on
04/29/2006 6:04:48 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Clintonfatigued
I'm remembering that song from the 1970's, "OH, LORD, PLEASE DON'T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD!"Eric Burdon and the Animals. Good stuff at the time. Yes, I'm old too.
FMCDH(BITS)
17
posted on
04/29/2006 6:04:51 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: CWOJackson
It's always so sad when a murderous butchering dictator gets misunderstood. I'm so woneweyyyyyy!!!
18
posted on
04/29/2006 6:07:10 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1623690/posts?page=228#228 clawrence3:"law abiding illegals")
To: jmc1969
The New York Times is attempting to revise history... It isn't enough to just attack the President; they have to justify their attacks by making it look like history was different than it actually was. They need to make the Iraq war look like an unnecessary war. If they cant do that, then in the end Bush was right to invade and all of their pathetic reporting turns out to be just a bunch of crap.
19
posted on
04/29/2006 6:13:43 PM PDT
by
jerod
To: jmc1969
Poor guy. I mean, except for the gassings and the genocide and the torture and the mass executions and the government-sponsered rape programs, what did Saddam do that was so wrong?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson