Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain For Defense Secretary?
Weekly Standard via CBS News ^ | April 30, 2006 | Ari Richter

Posted on 05/01/2006 9:30:19 AM PDT by Crackingham

Almost as much as President Bush's loyalty, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld may owe his job security to the prospect of what would happen if he resigned. Sure, it's a distraction from the war in Iraq and the rest of the war on terror to have a half dozen ex-generals calling for Rumsfeld's ouster. But suppose the president named a replacement. The scene would shift to the Senate Armed Services Committee, where a confirmation hearing would give 24 U.S. senators live TV time to air all their misgivings about a war that fewer and fewer Americans continue to support. You can see where Bush might prefer the four-star revolt to a three-ring circus.

There is, however, one man whom the American people and all senators know well enough that the president could, in effect, request a confirmation by acclamation. He happens to be a war hero. He would boost the morale of the men and women in uniform. And he would have bipartisan backing (ranging from his good pals John Kerry and Joe Lieberman to his would-be White House rivals Bill Frist and George Allen). This not-a-mystery man is, of course, John McCain.

We know President Bush isn't big on admitting mistakes, and he surely doesn't relish the prospect of accepting Rumsfeld's resignation only to see days of media coverage rehashing all the old questions about why we went to war. But this needn't be a multi-stage drama or a mea culpa. In the same prime-time speech that he announces Rumsfeld is leaving, Bush can announce he's chosen McCain to replace him, call on the Senate to act promptly and explain the logic of his decision. Which, in a nutshell, is that nothing is more important to the future security and foreign policy interests of the United States than that the mission in Iraq succeed.

The president can make clear he continues to value the work Rumsfeld has done in transforming the military for the challenges of the future. He can even say history will remember the willingness to be unpopular that allowed the Defense secretary to make much-needed tough decisions.

Then the president can turn to the reasons he is asking McCain to serve his country once again: to make the Pentagon a full partner in the building of a stable, self-governing Iraq and to re-engage the American people in the importance of the pursuit.

No one can match McCain's eloquence when it comes to talking about being a part of a cause larger than oneself. That's the message Americans need to hear — and believe — if there's any hope of regaining widespread public support for the difficult work ahead in Iraq.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; defense; iraq; mccain; military; rumseld; secdef; terrorism; whowritesthisbs; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2006 9:30:28 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Hey, he might be as good as Les Aspin...........


2 posted on 05/01/2006 9:31:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (In warfare there are no constant conditions. --- The Art of War by SunTzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
An early leader in the Dumb Idea of the Week contest...
3 posted on 05/01/2006 9:31:58 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
No one can match McCain's eloquence when it comes to talking about being a part of a cause larger than oneself. That's the message Americans need to hear — and believe — if there's any hope of regaining widespread public support for the difficult work ahead in Iraq.

That's NOT the message the Pentagon needs to hear. They need to hear more about transformation and Rumsfield has been taking it to them nicely.

4 posted on 05/01/2006 9:32:21 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

McCain? Defense? Are you kidding me, who writes this BS.


5 posted on 05/01/2006 9:32:37 AM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Isn't that the truth?


6 posted on 05/01/2006 9:32:49 AM PDT by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
How 'bout U.S. Ambassador to Antarctica.

Pluto, perhaps?
7 posted on 05/01/2006 9:33:02 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Rubbish...I had to read again to see if Bill Kristol was pushing this again


8 posted on 05/01/2006 9:33:02 AM PDT by peekaboo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Wow, this is your brain on crack.


9 posted on 05/01/2006 9:33:23 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Crackingham

What on earth is this inside the beltway obsession with McCain?


11 posted on 05/01/2006 9:34:00 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Ummm...No.


12 posted on 05/01/2006 9:34:09 AM PDT by Safetgiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

McCain for SecDef?

That would create a backlash that would make the Miers nomination seem like a Sunday picnic.

Surely, the Administration is not that out of touch.


13 posted on 05/01/2006 9:34:40 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

NO


remember the terrorist 'Bill of Rights'.


14 posted on 05/01/2006 9:34:58 AM PDT by IrishMike (Dry Powder is a plus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

McCain for Dog Catcher.


15 posted on 05/01/2006 9:35:42 AM PDT by KillTime (Democracies that can't distinguish between good and evil or deny any difference shall surely perish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Bush naming McCain as SecDef = massive numbers of voters abandoning the Republicans.


16 posted on 05/01/2006 9:37:09 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep
"...massive numbers of voters abandoning the Republicans."

Too late, someone already picked this answer to all or problems yesterday.

17 posted on 05/01/2006 9:40:29 AM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I may be inclined to go for this if he quits his day job.


18 posted on 05/01/2006 9:41:05 AM PDT by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
How 'bout U.S. Ambassador to Antarctica.
Pluto, perhaps?

No, actually, I'm thinking of another planet

19 posted on 05/01/2006 9:41:05 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

No to Rumsfeld Resignation

Yes to McCain Resignation


20 posted on 05/01/2006 9:42:38 AM PDT by Soul Seeker ("No Illegal Alien Left Behind Act" - (quote: Jeff Sessions) - 4/6/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson