Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jon Stewart Defends Colbert's Dinner Speech
Editor & Publisher ^ | May 2, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 05/02/2006 11:07:14 AM PDT by MC Miker G

NEW YORK Probably to no one's surprise, Jon Stewart, host of Comedy Central's "Daily Show," hailed the performance of his stablemate Stephen Colbert at Saturday night's White House Correspondents dinner. Colbert's lampooning of the president and the press has generated a good deal of praise and criticism.

"It was balls-alicious," Stewart said. "Apparently he was under the impression that they'd hired him to do what he does every night on television" -- that is, make fun of conservatives, public officials, and the press in the guise of an O'Reillyesque talk show host.

"We've never been prouder of him, but HOLY ----," Stewart added.

He also described the annual dinner as "where the President and the press corps consummate their loveless marriage."

Colbert then followed Stewart, on his own show, "The Colbert Report," describing the "honor of appearing" at the big dinner. He said the room was full of "power players," so he "fit right in."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: colbert; comedy; comedycentral; liberals; traitors; treason; whcadinner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: MC Miker G

I thought Stephen Colbert was the perfect speaker for that event. Colbert is to political commentary what President Bush is to cogent policy.


81 posted on 05/02/2006 1:53:54 PM PDT by PubliusToo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; hoosierboy
Why do people keep saying we need to be able to laugh at ourselves, as if somehow, if we could do so, we would have found Colbert hysterically funny. I don't understand what that comment even means. The jokes weren't about me (or you).

The jokes weren't even about the President. They were about the person the left portrays the President to be.

82 posted on 05/02/2006 1:55:27 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MC Miker G

Colbert is to Stewert what Sideshow Bob is to Crusty the Clown.


83 posted on 05/02/2006 1:55:34 PM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick

Good point.
susie


84 posted on 05/02/2006 2:09:11 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Ghengis

Clearly, we are old (altho the other day a poster accused me of being very young!)
susie


85 posted on 05/02/2006 2:11:22 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: alnick
Which is exactly why his material wasn't funny. It was based on the premise that the delusional left is correct. There was very, very little truth in what he said.

Examples?

86 posted on 05/02/2006 3:26:49 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (Karen Ryan reporting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Panzerfaust
Still, I'll concede that the Doolittle raid did have more panche.

It was the timing. Pearl Harbor, followed by one damned Jap victory after another ... and then that thunderbolt from Jimmy D!

87 posted on 05/02/2006 4:06:43 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

You want examples? The entire bit.

Reality has a leftist bias?

"The media is bad for America," said in character as a paranoid right winger.

The press secretary running in fear from Helen Thomas because she's asking the "uncomfortable" question, "Why did we go to war with Iraq?" and then running into other people with the same question, as if a valid reason were never given.

In character as a right wing press secretary, advising the media that it shouldn't report on secret prisons, wiretapping terrorists, tax cuts, and so forth as if there's something to hide about those things and if the people knew the truth, they'd vote the Republicans out.

And on and on and on.


88 posted on 05/02/2006 5:36:51 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: hoosierboy

"when he attacks his guests he attacks their liberal views and makes fools of them even though the people in the crowd are definitely democratic voters."

It's called sarcasm. He's laughing with them, not at them.


89 posted on 05/04/2006 7:28:18 AM PDT by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; All

He made fun of the president, and in a hateful way.

I can handle humor.

He wasn't funny. He was vindictive.


90 posted on 05/04/2006 7:30:46 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson