Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Would Punish Schools that Prevent Display of US Flag
CNSNews ^ | May 02, 2006 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 05/03/2006 11:54:49 AM PDT by 300magnum

A North Carolina lawmaker introduced a bill Tuesday that would prohibit a school from receiving federal funds if it prevents a student from displaying or wearing a representation of the U.S. flag in a respectful manner.

Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) introduced H.R. 5255, also known as the American Flag Display Protection Act, after recent reports of several schools in California, Arizona and Colorado banning the display of U.S. flags or the wearing of clothes with other patriotic symbols in reaction to clashes between students regarding the debate over immigration.

"The most important symbol of any Nation is the national flag," Jones said in a press release. "Since ancient times, flags or banners have served to identify and unify groups of people, especially in times of war."

In April, a Denver newspaper reported that several students in Shaw Heights Middle School were given one-day suspensions after wearing U.S. Marines t-shirts or shirts with U.S. flags. Also, another student at a middle school was suspended for a D.A.R.E. program shirt that had a flag behind the logo.

"Throughout our Nation, the American flag is displayed in classrooms and school hallways," said Jones. "The display of the American flag by students should be afforded an extraordinary level of protection - and should by no means be equated with the treatment of those who choose to display the flag of foreign powers.

"School officials in this country who prohibit students from wearing or displaying the United States flag in a respectful manner should not do so without consequence," concluded Jones.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 109th; flagwaving; hr5255; oldglory; walterjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2006 11:54:52 AM PDT by 300magnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Yep, that is our biggest problem here in NC. Glad someone is looking our for us.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 11:55:27 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Isnt he the idiot who blocking the 93 monument? What a buffoon


3 posted on 05/03/2006 11:56:10 AM PDT by skaterboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
Isnt he the idiot who blocking the 93 monument? What a buffoon

If you are talking about the red crescent designed monument, it should be SHI*CANNED.

4 posted on 05/03/2006 12:00:00 PM PDT by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Hes got my vote.


5 posted on 05/03/2006 12:00:52 PM PDT by HOTTIEBOY (AIXELSYD TAEB I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
It's called (among other things) ACLU
6 posted on 05/03/2006 12:05:06 PM PDT by yoe (Aim low boys, they're riding Burros.........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

No. You are thinking of our Congressman, Charles Taylor. He said he is concerned about funding for the monument and he's on the appropriations committee.

But if it has that crescent, I don't want it.


7 posted on 05/03/2006 12:05:52 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
Isnt he the idiot who blocking the 93 monument? What a buffoon

That "monument" was nothing more than a tribute to Islam. Might as well set up a mosque too while we're at it. Whoever designed it was smoking crack.

8 posted on 05/03/2006 12:07:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (FR's most controversial FReeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Yea, Mr Freedom Fries himself. Don't let him fool you...

http://profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3?DistSend=NC&VIPID=484


9 posted on 05/03/2006 12:07:59 PM PDT by ncObserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Oh, goody. More federal carrot-and-stick legislation.

There shouldn't even BE any federal funding for schools. But, since there is, Congress is free to use it as a club to beat dependents into submission.


10 posted on 05/03/2006 12:10:37 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

Taking money away from the schools is not a meaningful punishment. How about taking money out of the paychecks of principals and other school officials (via fines)who are responsible for giving students suspensions? Hit them in the pocket book and see if they don't suddenly develop a patriotic 'tude.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 12:11:22 PM PDT by looois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I'm sure he's doing other things besides this.


12 posted on 05/03/2006 12:21:06 PM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

"Throughout our Nation, the American flag is displayed in classrooms and school hallways," said Jones. "The display of the American flag by students should be afforded an extraordinary level of protection - and should by no means be equated with the treatment of those who choose to display the flag of foreign powers.

"School officials in this country who prohibit students from wearing or displaying the United States flag in a respectful manner should not do so without consequence," concluded Jones.


13 posted on 05/03/2006 12:34:55 PM PDT by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

Anyone who supports the United 93 trophy to Islam is a buffoon. But what has that got to do with flying the flag on public property?


14 posted on 05/03/2006 12:45:19 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

15 posted on 05/03/2006 12:50:21 PM PDT by 300magnum (We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I'm glad too.


16 posted on 05/03/2006 1:39:18 PM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swmobuffalo

Throughout our Nation, the American flag is displayed in classrooms and school hallways," said Jones. "The display of the American flag by students should be afforded an extraordinary level of protection - and should by no means be equated with the treatment of those who choose to display the flag of foreign powers.

"School officials in this country who prohibit students from wearing or displaying the United States flag in a respectful manner should not do so without consequence," concluded Jones.

In our high schools here, many of them have "freedom" monuments with flags and such. They're pretty impressive displays. Now, this organization is pushng for that type of thing to go into the elementaries too that will feature information about the founding fathers and how we got our freedoms as well as learning materials. I think it's WONDERFUL as a teacher--it'll go right with our curriculum. It's been supported in pretty much every school that I know of too. I appreciate organizations like this doing something so constructive.


17 posted on 05/03/2006 1:42:07 PM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Yep, that is our biggest problem here in NC. Glad someone is looking our for us.

There are a lot of congressmen and women working on a lot of problems (and non-problems, but that's a different story). I'm sure the gears in DC aren't going to grind to a halt because your congressman submitted this bill.

18 posted on 05/03/2006 1:54:00 PM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog

Okay. I feel better now.


19 posted on 05/03/2006 1:56:47 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

We already have such a rule...it's called the First Ammendment.

If the First Ammendment can be used to burn them, it should be used to fly them.


20 posted on 05/03/2006 2:07:25 PM PDT by Military family member (GO Colts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson