Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diego judge orders: Take down that cross! (American Communist-Liberal Union Strikes Again!!!)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 3, 2006

Posted on 05/03/2006 4:09:29 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan


Mt. Soledad cross and veterans memorial above San Diego (soledadmemorial.com)

Ruling on a 15-year-old ACLU case, a federal judge today ordered the city of San Diego to remove a mountain-top cross within 90 days or face a fine of $5,000 a day.

U.S. District Judge Gordon Thompson said, "It is now time, and perhaps long overdue, for this court to enforce its initial permanent injunction forbidding the presence of the Mount Soledad cross on city property," the San Diego Union-Tribune reported.

Thompson ruled in 1991 the Mount Soledad cross violates the so-called "separation of church and state" but the case has remained in courts and become an issue of public policy for more than a decade.

ACLU lawyer James McElroy believes San Diego officials finally will give up their fight.

"I don't think the city has its heart in taking more action," he said, according to the paper.

A city lawyer argued during the hour-long court hearing today that citizens had voted for transfer of the land under the cross.

Proposition A, passed by 75 percent in July, called for the city to donate the cross to the federal government as the centerpiece of a veterans memorial.

The ballot initiative came about after the city refused to donate the cross and memorial to the federal government. A group called San Diegans for the Mount Soledad National War Memorial took just 23 days to gather 105,000 signatures.

In a ruling now on appeal, however, a Superior Court judge found the transfer unconstitutional.

The Union-Tribune said the group behind the public vote on transfer likely will appeal Thompson's decision.

The 29-foot cross has stood on Mount Soledad as the center of a war memorial on city land since 1954. The first cross on the site was built in 1913.

A bill authorizing the federal government to take over the memorial was authored by Republican U.S. Reps. Duncan Hunter and Randy Cunningham. President Bush signed the bill into law in December.

Responding to today's ruling, Mayor Jerry Sanders said he would recommend the city council and city attorney take action to save the cross.

The battle began in 1989 when Phillip Paulsen, an atheist, filed suit, and a court ordered the city to remove the cross. In 1998, the city sold the property to the Mt. Soledad War Memorial Association, which again was challenged in court. The sale originally was upheld but later ruled unconstitutional by the full panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco and remanded back to district court to work out a remedy.

During its brief period of ownership, the Memorial Association made significant improvements, including extensive landscaping and the addition of more than 3,000 plaques honoring military veterans.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; cross; gordonthompson; lawsuit; moralabsolutes; mountsoledad; mtsoledad; purge; ruling; sandiego; soledad; soledadcross
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: HitmanLV
Given the ACLU's pathological fear of crosses, I have begun to consider that they may be an organization of vampires.


41 posted on 05/03/2006 6:45:26 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Good gravy, that's terrifying! :-)
42 posted on 05/03/2006 6:50:26 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

I thought it was cute, LOL.


43 posted on 05/03/2006 6:52:24 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
I ran so fast I tripped on a shoe!
44 posted on 05/03/2006 6:53:56 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

LOL.


45 posted on 05/03/2006 6:55:05 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Foolsgold

This "judge" needs to be impeached. This is insane.


46 posted on 05/03/2006 7:18:48 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What we need is a whole bunch of civil disobedience. Cities just plain refusing to cooperate. What's the ACLU going to do? I suppose US marshals or something will come and remove the cross.

I'm really disgusted. FUBAR.


47 posted on 05/03/2006 7:35:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

It is almost time to fight.


48 posted on 05/04/2006 12:35:18 AM PDT by Jimbaugh (Fear the Base !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chena
why that sale would have been unconstitutional

Essentially... the court found it wasn't an arms-length sale, but was rigged to keep the atheist from buying the cross.

49 posted on 05/04/2006 12:44:59 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

The City of San Diego should remove the cross, and then drive it through the heart of the ACLU's attorney.


50 posted on 05/04/2006 9:42:01 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Precisely. Who was it that said, "The court has made its ruling; new let them enforce it"?


51 posted on 05/04/2006 9:46:40 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
Precisely. Who was it that said, "The court has made its ruling; new let them enforce it"?

Seems to me that was Andrew Jackson.

52 posted on 05/04/2006 10:41:12 AM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

I believe that was Tennessee's own Andy Jackson. He rightly fought against the establishment of the Federal Reserve.


53 posted on 05/04/2006 4:51:12 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
This "judge" needs to be impeached. This is insane.

I absolutely agree.

And yes, I'm athiest.

54 posted on 05/04/2006 4:54:33 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson