Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONGRESSIONAL RECOIL FROM LATEST DUBAI TAKEOVER
Sierra Times ^ | 5/4/2006 | Diane Grassi

Posted on 05/04/2006 8:06:30 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: TBP; FerdieMurphy
Where Is the Outrage at Bush's Dubai Arms Deal? President Bush approved a deal to allow a company from Dubai, the country that was forced to withdraw from the Portgate deal, to take over American plants that make parts for jets and tanks for the United States.

Bush did not approve any deal between companies. That is done between the owners and stockholders. Neither CFIUS nor congress saw the purchase as a threat to national security so therefore he did not veto the deal on that basis and neither did congress disapprove on that basis. The president does not run around making deals for companies. Actually he did nothing but accept the findings of CFIUS and congress.

21 posted on 05/04/2006 10:01:56 AM PDT by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Representative John Barrow [said]..... “We’ll never know if continuing down this path of selling of our national defense industries will end up hurting us in the long run. We all have to draw the line when it comes to selling our national defense establishment. We don’t want to outsource our military industrial complex one piece at a time.”

He's right. I don't give a flying [insert word] what country is buying our defense contractors, its not good.

22 posted on 05/04/2006 10:07:35 AM PDT by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Carefull infidel, don't snuggle up too close to your Muslim pals, you may loose your head.

The only reason we can park our ships in the ports of Dubai is because we protect them from other Muslims who would not think twice about sinking those ships.

If they weren't in fear of them, they most certainly wouldn't be our chummy pals. We are only a nessesary evil for them at the moment, and that could very easily change.

23 posted on 05/04/2006 10:11:55 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antisocial

"Name calling begins in the 3rd post."

Yes, and we should ignore this type of poster. FR only has a few of these kind of people on it and we only make it worse by responding to them. They like to make trouble, so ignoring them is the best thing to do. We should do the some with the other name callers that, I am sure, you are aware of. They start fights every time they post and we help them by responding.


24 posted on 05/04/2006 10:18:25 AM PDT by VOATNOW1 (Ignore the trolls. Pass it on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: antisocial

Infamous, shreiking CAPS begin in the 11th.


25 posted on 05/04/2006 10:18:30 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

All other arguments aside, basing a good portion of the fleet in that part of the world in Dubai,is tactical stupidity of the first order.

You don't put blue water navy in a situation where it has to run narrow straits in order to get out to the open ocean. John Paul Jones and Lord Nelson must be spinning in their graves. Bad things happen to navies in narrow waters.



26 posted on 05/04/2006 10:30:36 AM PDT by coladirienzi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; FerdieMurphy; Iscool; TBP
Gee I am sorry you have an irrational fear and hate of Muslims.

I am sorry you have a blind trust of those who fly planes into our buildings and military headquarters and behead people. Perhaps that will be some comfort to you when you, or your descendants, are forced to your knees and the hooded ones start chanting Allah is great as they start to saw your head off.

Oh that's right. Only 10% are "extreme". Assuming for a minute that is true, that makes a 100 million or so of the murdering SOBS's running around. Yet somehow I am a rascist because I am just a tad bit concerned about them.

27 posted on 05/04/2006 10:40:52 AM PDT by MattinNJ (Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Okay so are you equally concerned about the port facilities on the West Coast run by the Red Chinese? If you are so shocked about Dubai Ports World where is your outrage over the National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia. They run 9 port terminals on the east coast.

You are being used by a group of politician pandering to the stevedore unions. Congratulations.

28 posted on 05/04/2006 11:19:53 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
fail completely to recognized the fact that that vast bulk of the people doing the fighting and dying for US in the War on Terror are Arab Muslims.

There is no one dying in Arabia for Americans...Plenty of Americans have died for them tho...Unless you are suggesting this so-called war is for the benefit of George Bush and the Republican Party and you...That could very well be...

29 posted on 05/04/2006 11:47:15 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Dubya seems to be going to great lengths to alienate more and more Americans, and undermine his leadership & credibility. Can't wait to see his incongruous smiles, strange stream-of-conciousness speech, and odd squints when a democrat controlled house impeaches his arse and keeps him busy while a war against Islamic terrorism continues.
30 posted on 05/04/2006 11:49:42 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Follow the money. The ports deal had 0% to do with security and 100% to do with union politics.

Isn't that funny...Most of the country was against the deal...Know what??? Most of the country doesn't belong to a union...Guess you know what you're talking about...

31 posted on 05/04/2006 11:50:06 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the whole trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

UAE are the ones that are the bigoted and antisemitic Hamas-funders.


32 posted on 05/04/2006 11:52:32 AM PDT by Flavius Josephus (Nationalism is not a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
American Know Nothings, who never even been outside their own trailer park

Yeah, you can teach us a lot about racism and bigotry.

33 posted on 05/04/2006 11:54:09 AM PDT by Flavius Josephus (Nationalism is not a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
I am equally, if not more so, concerned about the Chicomms. The Chinese are highly competent and are doing a brilliant job of spreading their tentacles. I trust the Saudi's, the Dubain's etc... as far as I can throw them.

My opposition has nothing to do with supporting the unions as I am a free market capitalist and consider the unions an artificial barrier to that economic school of thought. How would you label me? Did you ever leave room for the possibility that there are conservatives out there who oppose the deal from strictly a national security point of view?

34 posted on 05/04/2006 11:55:55 AM PDT by MattinNJ (Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
In fact we import a great deal of it. Aircraft parts are made at several Canadian plants for example.

So what are we supposed to do if we have to go to war with Canada? They'll pwn us.

35 posted on 05/04/2006 11:56:18 AM PDT by Flavius Josephus (Nationalism is not a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Can't wait to see his incongruous smiles, strange stream-of-conciousness speech, and odd squints when a democrat controlled house impeaches his arse

Heh. That will be entertaining, no matter which side of the aisle you're on.

36 posted on 05/04/2006 11:58:50 AM PDT by Flavius Josephus (Nationalism is not a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
It is not I, sir or madam, that pretends to be conservative.

Excellent post, but I fear its wasted on spam artists, especially those who save their most vitriolic spittle-flecked criticisms for 'fellow' conservatives.

37 posted on 05/04/2006 12:00:49 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

That's certainly true.


38 posted on 05/04/2006 12:01:14 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
The ports deal had 0% to do with security and 100% to do with union politics.

Congratulations! You win the grand prize!

The union politics was played by the Democrats; the Republicans were cowed by the Democrats.

39 posted on 05/04/2006 12:04:05 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Isn't that funny...Most of the country was against the deal...Know what??? Most of the country doesn't belong to a union...Guess you know what you're talking about...

Why isn't the country opposed to this deal?

Here's a hint: the country was whipped into a frenzy by a huckster (Chuck Schumer), aided and abetted by the terminally stupid Peter King, who managed to tap an Arab xenophobia.

Perhaps the country is ashamed of itself, or it has shifted its xenophobia toward Mexicans.

40 posted on 05/04/2006 12:10:43 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson