Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice's 'bittersweet' Straw call (Condi bittersweet ?)
BBC ^ | Friday, 5 May 2006

Posted on 05/05/2006 3:24:17 PM PDT by gwb43_2004

US Secretary of State Condeleezza Rice has made a "bittersweet" phone call to Jack Straw and his successor as foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said "she had no better or closer colleague than Jack Straw".

He also said that Ms Rice looked forward to working with Mrs Beckett.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: rice; straw

1 posted on 05/05/2006 3:24:18 PM PDT by gwb43_2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gwb43_2004

The original pushers of the Iraq War (at UN) are gone, Powell and Straw. Coincidentally, its cheif backers have 30-40 something approval ratings. Its a same such a just thing was so unpopular.


2 posted on 05/05/2006 3:27:14 PM PDT by HHKrepublican_2 (www.Rogers2006.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2
Powell had to be dragged into supporting the Iraq War.

Powell never wants to fight a war, no matter how justified. What a strange general he is.

3 posted on 05/05/2006 3:29:10 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gwb43_2004

I'm surprised they didn't take up two paragraphs describing her attire. The whole article is a tad too Oprah-esque.


4 posted on 05/05/2006 3:29:31 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

JACK NO MORE !
Well condi was pretty close to him.


5 posted on 05/05/2006 3:30:17 PM PDT by gwb43_2004 (I love W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

that was the washington post describing her boots etc.


6 posted on 05/05/2006 3:32:29 PM PDT by gwb43_2004 (I love W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwb43_2004

Be interesting to see how Condi gets along with a leftist harridan.


7 posted on 05/05/2006 3:38:54 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snugs

PING!


8 posted on 05/05/2006 3:43:47 PM PDT by gwb43_2004 (I love W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Beckett, the new British Foreign Secretary, will be full of herself, I'll bet. She'll walk in all tough and demanding, trying to score points with Gordon Brown so she can be kept on when Tony is purged by next Night of the Long Knives.

Poor woman; she'll forget that Condi's a bit too butch to be pushed around by some lapsed ideologue, I'll wager. Condi deals with Chicoms and Russians every day. A former CND lefty should be easy for Condi to handle after she's laid down the law at the first meeting.

She won't walk out so tough.

But you'll never know. Both of them will be all smiles.

As Condi always says, "power matters".

Be Seeing You,

Chris

9 posted on 05/05/2006 4:44:31 PM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: section9

Yes, the only reason to keep Blair is to stall Brown, a truly sinister character let alone the question why, in this day and age, the English should have a Scot as PM.


10 posted on 05/05/2006 5:54:29 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: section9

It's a common mistake to underestimate Margaret Beckett. She's a survivor ( the longest serving of any Labour minster), tough and nothing if not pragmatic.


11 posted on 05/06/2006 12:58:00 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

"let alone the question why, in this day and age, the English should have a Scot as PM"

You're joking right? I mean, Gordon Brown ugh, but I feel obliged to be offended on Celtic grounds!


12 posted on 05/06/2006 2:29:09 AM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Canard

No offence !! It's just that the Scots and Welsh now have their own assemblies, in which any other MP can't vote but poor old England has no assembly in fact to even say English rather than British is frowned upon. Scots MPs are what keep the Labour mob in power - England itself having voted Tory last time.


13 posted on 05/06/2006 8:02:29 AM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Both the Scottish and Welsh assemblies are nothing more than a waste of time and money, but that's not really the point. The UK Parliament is exactly that, not the Parliament of England. You might as well say that a Lancastrian or Brummie should not be PM.

I am actually English, though have lived in Wales for a while now. Who do you think 'frowns upon' saying English rather than British? The two are not synonyms, so depends what you're talking about at the time.


14 posted on 05/06/2006 10:40:43 AM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Canard

I have noted the objections to any idea of an English assembly and yes I'm aware that Westminster is the UK gov't.
I believe the situation vis a vis the Scots & Welsh is referred to as "The Midlothian Question".

What's Welsh for "duck", bet it's not canard :)


15 posted on 05/06/2006 4:37:40 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson