Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruise Liner with 708 Aboard on Fire 20 Miles Off Southeast England
Reuters ^ | May 6, 2006

Posted on 05/05/2006 9:16:28 PM PDT by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: GATOR NAVY

My Gosh!


81 posted on 05/07/2006 1:32:51 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Please ! For The Love of God Verizon !!! NO MORE MICHAEL McDONALD !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
A little bit off subject but this is a perfect text book example of why the WTC towers fell. Most persons don't understand fire inside steel structures. I didn't catch the hull blown out first look. The cause would be very interesting. Hard to know if that was the primary fire that did it and spread up or the fire above deck went down and did it. Fighting fires below would be in a living hell due to high temps though.

Being under tow indicates likely DIW conditions. I have no idea how far aft the mains actually are on those ships. Very glad I wasn't on board.

82 posted on 05/07/2006 1:44:14 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Here's an interesting link wondering what was in the containers: http://eaglespeak.blogspot.com/2006/04/hyundai-fortune-fire-update-what-was.html

When we saw her she was not just DIW but totally dark, obviously without power. There were two salvage tugs, one towing and one alongside. We were close enough to easily read the "Hyundai" on the side in their lights, about 2 miles.


83 posted on 05/07/2006 2:30:21 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Thanks for the link it explains quite a lot. Hum solveants, possible disposable propane tanks, the possibilities are endless. You know it and I know it it doesn't take much to start a ship fire. The origional fire may have not been related to cargo and the large one a secondary result. Who knows. The smoke says fuel, grease, or possibly tires etc {no one would think about them being a fire hazard}.

Sounds like the shippers need some stronger D.C. programs and education of the loaders as well. This one will come down on the Captain. He should have examined the manifest against location on ship at least on paper before getting underway. It sounds like the shippers could use what the Navy called a Damage Control Assistant. A good one fears no mans threats. Ours cut the Admirals pop corn machine cord for no saftey tag.

84 posted on 05/07/2006 2:45:51 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
The whole idea behind container shipping means that something like this will always be a possibility. But Hyundai Lines does seem to have more problems than other lines.

Here's the Hyundai Pennsylvania fireworks photo mentioned in the link


85 posted on 05/07/2006 3:37:22 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
One more just for fun


86 posted on 05/07/2006 3:46:32 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
The freighters are built to run on skeleton crews. A hand full of snipes, a hand full of Deck Apes, and a few paper pushers, a Navigator, and cook that's it. That leaves precious little for Damage Control.

The Navy to a certain extent is trying to adapt such a policy via automation. Most fires on ships are found by alert crew members and the potentially serious ones can be under control before the Fire Party or DC team is manned and ready. But nothing replaces a rover watch for DC monitoring.

A ship is a very dangerous place to cut safety corners to save a buck be it on manpower or equipment. With todays technology though there is no reason for a ship to burn like that except for the fact cost have been cut by not using sprinklers etc. Further out at sea with no help from nearby ships the Hyundai fire below decks the only hope would have been to have completely flooded adjoining compartments as close as they could get to it and pray. Flood the opposite side if needed to correct the list. Top side get as much tossed over the side as possible and that takes manpower. Which rules that out on a freighter. It could have been worse on any of them. It could have been magnesium.

87 posted on 05/07/2006 6:11:39 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
A lot of stuff has changed. Carriers now have a full time Fire Department

That's what I've heard. Being in the sub force, everyone was a firefighter. The positions I've held have always depended upon the watch that I was standing. For example, one time I was nozzleman offgoing, and DC phone talker oncoming.

I did have one though where the OBA went out on me two decks down. I wrapped my lips around the hose and got my lungs full of air then got out. I think those are gone now as well replaced with Scott Air Packs I heard. I hated the cannisters.

Yeah, I'm very familiar with OBAs. I hated them. Really easy to get burned with a hot canister. And what a pain they were when you were in your FFEs. We always had another person dedicated to the fireteams just so they could suit up their OBAs quickly.

They started to switch to scott air packs as you said, but I would still prefer the OBAs. Even though the scott air pack is superior to the OBA in almost every way, it has one drawback: the facemasks come in various sizes and you generally have to mold it to your face over time. This means that you can't give a random sailor a scott air pack and tell him to fight a fire, unless he has his facemask with him. I'm not sure how the Navy is handling that.

88 posted on 05/08/2006 12:18:41 AM PDT by burzum (A single reprimand does more for a man of intelligence than a hundred lashes for a fool.--Prov 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: B-Cause

Future possible names: Smoking Hulk, Floating Ember, and the Abandoned Ship.


89 posted on 05/08/2006 6:15:48 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: burzum
They started to switch to scott air packs as you said, but I would still prefer the OBAs. Even though the scott air pack is superior to the OBA in almost every way, it has one drawback: the facemasks come in various sizes and you generally have to mold it to your face over time. This means that you can't give a random sailor a scott air pack and tell him to fight a fire, unless he has his facemask with him. I'm not sure how the Navy is handling that.

Not sure but I would say it could be practical to do a personal issue at least on the mask. When I was on FD we had our own OBA's and kept them next to the berthing area. We pre-adjusted our mask to where all we had to do was pull the bottom ??? straps tight when putting it on. You're right it would be a drawback but depending on the size & flexibility it may be practical to carry it in a pouch. I don't know enough about it to say though.

A friend of mine was an IC operator instructor at the Idaho Prototype back in the mid 1980's. He told me what he could about being on a sub. I think he was stationed on the PHENIOX also.

90 posted on 05/08/2006 7:07:40 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

Very nice! I am heading out on the 14th on the Mariner of the Seas on the 7 night eastern carribean cruise. If a fire breaks out - i'm breaking out marshmallows.


91 posted on 05/08/2006 7:40:23 AM PDT by FormerRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac
There's been a lot worse...like back in 1934...


92 posted on 05/08/2006 8:26:17 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: burzum
How'ya doin' Bubblehead? I spent a little time in boats myself. (627 SSBNs and Flt 1 688s) Never had to deal with a fire, but one of my shipmates on the Von Steuben was a machinist on the Belknap when the Canopener came through. After watching the aluminum superstructure catch fire, he decided to transfer to something nice and safe, a sub. BTW I've always been suitably impressed with the graffiti on the side of Parche's sail. I think Red Ramage would be proud.
93 posted on 05/08/2006 8:34:52 AM PDT by 75thOVI (A walk across the depths of America's economic understanding, wouldn't moisten your toes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

A French lifeboat and helicopter have also been sent to the scene.

If the French get involved, they will definitely sink the ship. Of surrender it to one of the passengers.


94 posted on 05/08/2006 9:44:19 PM PDT by antiunion person (Maybe it is BUSH'S FAULT!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Only if they're crossing Ice Fields.......

/sarc


95 posted on 05/08/2006 9:46:27 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson