Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney Considered Quitting 2004 Campaign Over Gay Marriage Issue
ABC News ^ | May 3, 2006

Posted on 05/08/2006 4:06:47 PM PDT by skandalon

She says she considered quitting her role as campaign adviser over the issue of gay marriage, but Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter Mary Cheney tells ABC News "Primetime" anchor Diane Sawyer her sexuality has never created problems within her family.

Mary Cheney discussed the campaign, her feelings about President Bush, life with her partner of 14 years, and what it was like to come out as gay to her parents.

"I struggled with my decision to stay on the 2004 campaign," Cheney told "Primetime." Her personal challenge came when President Bush said the nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cheney; disordered; gaymarriage; gwb2004; homosexualagenda; marriage; marycheney; pervertperverts; perverts; pervertspervert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 461-470 next last
To: DBeers
Homosexual activity is a choice and it is a wrong choice...

Misery is a choice and a wrong choice. Not knowing the difference between what is personal and what is public is a choice and a wrong choice. Not knowing the difference between what is God's and what is government's is a choice and a wrong choice. Being a pharisee rather than a disciple is a choice and a wrong choice. Over eating is a choice and a wrong choice. Being unloving in word or deed is a choice and a wrong choice. Being hard hearted is a choice and a wrong choice. Having unclean thoughts is a choice and a wrong choice. Feeling better than others is a choice and a wrong choice...etc etc etc

And all of them - every single one of them negatively impacts all of humanity.

121 posted on 05/08/2006 8:03:58 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
I am not aware of the existence of lesbian brains...

There is a perfect example of junk.

122 posted on 05/08/2006 8:05:04 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
And all of them - every single one of them negatively impacts all of humanity.

Maybe you can start an "all of them" agenda ping list and opine about everything equally... Somewhere else...

I suggest you move on to another topic if you can not face reality and do not want to discuss the premise of this topic -the homosexual disorder -the leftists' sacred cow...

123 posted on 05/08/2006 8:29:03 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
I would suggest that you get used to the idea that you cannot control, intimidate, shame, belittle etc your way into domination of any thread.

But you sure can expose yourself as one of the modern day pharisees(g).

124 posted on 05/08/2006 8:38:16 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
There is a perfect example of junk.

My posting simply reiterates reality and counters the delusion premising the article of propaganda specific to the homosexual disorder you were so gracious to introduce into the discussion.

It is odd that you are specific in support of homosexual propaganda yet have attempted in ambiguous fashion to avoid and or discredit anything specific claiming the homosexual condition is disordered and to be avoided...

I simply stated my understanding of the scientific fact that there is no such "thing" as a lesbian brain -period... Scientists can not yet identify a lesbian -how can one imagine scientists can identify a lesbian brain? LOL!

Now as to real junk -your postings on this discussion thus far taken as a whole quite biased and quite supportive of the homosexualization of society...

On the one hand you ambiguously denounce all who would sit in judgment of those who choose to engage in homosexual activity while also attempting to divert the topic by introducing other things as morally wrong as homosexual activity. All this while adding in junk science propaganda! LOL

I would suggest you just give up -it is quite transparent what you attempt here... The more you post the deeper the hole you dig...

125 posted on 05/08/2006 8:54:42 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

And just who is it that has made the personal public?


126 posted on 05/08/2006 9:00:09 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...graduated to Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
But you sure can expose yourself as one of the modern day pharisees(g).

Actually, let's keep it simple and avoid personal name calling and personal attacks -shall we?

I oppose the homosexualization of society and consider homosexual activity to be disordered and something to be avoided -it is something to be discouraged, something not meriting any social privilege or reward...

-and you?

Can you transcend meek ambiguousness and passive personal attacks to stick your neck out for what you believe SPECIFIC to the question? I do not think you can do it -I think your fear of zotting is too strong...

127 posted on 05/08/2006 9:04:01 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
My posting simply reiterates reality

Your postings simply show your hatred your hard-heartedness, your mental rigidity and your blatant attempt to place yourself as judge of others.

As I say, you expose yourself as a modern day pharisee...the taleban Christians - those who want to control others' lives when their own are so clearly tainted with sin.

128 posted on 05/08/2006 9:09:14 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Actually, let's keep it simple and avoid personal name calling and personal attacks -shall we?

Do you mean like this statement from you?

I guess I can assume you advocate defeatism and social pacifism with a smidgen of indignant outrage and ambiguous finger pointing...

Pointing out that you expose yourself as a modern day pharisee is just accurate feedback for you(g). Hopefully you are capable of inner reflection...

Unless you are without sin yourself - you are out of line, imo, with your hatred and condemnation of others.

My point here is that you are, imo, delving into things that are not your business. I would urge you to put your energies into reducing the size and scope of government - not trying to increase it by spying on people and getting into their bedrooms.

129 posted on 05/08/2006 9:31:02 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
As I say, you expose yourself as a modern day pharisee...the taleban Christians - those who want to control others' lives when their own are so clearly tainted with sin.

Well, I am an atheist... go ahead expose yourself... you are using the Christians as a proxy for hatred of Judaism, aren't you?

Morality and all of its associated concepts are from the belief some higher power defines what is correct in human behavior. Today, "morals" are a religious pagan philosophy of esoteric hobgoblins. Transfiguration is a pantheon of fantasies as the medium of infinitization. Others get derision for having an unwavering Judaic belief in Yahweh and/or Yeshua, although their critics and enemies will evangelize insertion of phantasmagoric fetishisms into secular law.

Mosaic Law (of which the Ten Commandments is just a part) is the foundation of Western Civilization. Genesis is the primary focus of the Declaration of Independence, from where our Constitutional rights are derived. The Ten Commandments are the foundation of our judicial system.

Moses wrote Genesis. This is why such people will jump up and down screaming when the Ten Commandments are displayed or the Creationist idea of monogamy from the book of Genesis is introduced.

The latter (Genesis) also ruins the illogical and non-biological arguments of homosexual monogamy. In a secular sense, homosexuality is an idolatry of perversion. It is in no way an anatomical function of the human organism, but a phantasmagoric creation from within the mentally disturbed human mind, a social psychosis, naked and on full exhibitionist display.

This is the whole crux of their attack on creationism - - they are really frustrated by Genesis, but cannot destroy the axiomatic state of procreant human biology, it does not fit their religious agenda.

Homosexual monogamy advocates seek ceremonious sanctification of their anatomical perversions and esoteric absolution for their guilt-ridden, impoverished egos.

Neither of those will satisfy their universal dissatisfaction with mortality or connect them to something eternal. With pantheons of fantasies as their medium of infinitization, they still have nothing in them of reality, any more than there is in the things that seem to stand before us in a dream.

Homosexual deviancy is really a pagan practice (and a self-induced social psychosis) at war with the Judaic culture over what is written in the book of Genesis (1:27, 2:18).

This is exactly what the National Socialists were at war with... so, when someone uses the term "Gaystapo," they might not realize how close to the truth they really are.

Many will seek ceremonious sanctification and esoteric absolution in some type of marriage rite, but that still fails to give them a connection to the eternal in both a religious and temporal, procreant sense - - the union does not produce offspring.

Dissatisfaction with inevitable mortality only feeds the impoverishment of the ego further. Homosexuals really hate human life; their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...

I'll take the Christians any day over the pervert wierdos on drugs who spread diseases (and their enablers, like you)...

130 posted on 05/08/2006 9:32:34 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: skandalon

I wish she had. She's nothing but a cheerleader for the homosexual agenda, using her father's position to agitate for her perverted cause.


131 posted on 05/08/2006 9:34:00 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

I would urge you to put your energies into reducing the size and scope of government - not trying to increase it by spying on people and getting into their bedrooms.


And that's more fun, how?


132 posted on 05/08/2006 9:37:56 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
There are no "gay" people, there are people (always heterosexual) who feel predisposed cause unknown to engage in homosexual activity and or people (always heterosexual) who actually choose to engage in homosexual activity.

100% correct. "Gay" is an addictive lifestyle choice--almost identical to being a swinger or a binge drinker. It's not "who you are" -- it's how you behave. The penis was not meant by nature to be jammed into someone's anus in much the same way it was not meant to be jammed into a meat-grinder.

Let me know when a group of sickos starts demanding the right to marry meat-grinders, will you?
133 posted on 05/08/2006 9:40:21 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Are there black people, or are they, too, ones who feel predisposed to engage in black activities?

I know plenty of black people who would be outraged that you'd make such an inane comparison. This comparison is so asinine, I'm surprised people still make it.

Was any "gay" person ever born genetically pre-disposed to jam his penis into another man's anus? I don't think so...
134 posted on 05/08/2006 9:43:10 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You're saying they CHOOSE to live miserable lives?

So do drug addicts and alcoholics. Do you enable that behavior, too?
135 posted on 05/08/2006 9:45:07 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Skandalon is not gay---stop calling skandalon gay. It's not nice. Also, and seriously, you have no more reason branding Mary Cheney's gayness "shameful" as you have in assuming her parents are embarrassed by it or find it shameful. That, you might remember, is the loathsome tack taken by the fat wife of John Edwards during the last election. But if you want to be like them, that's your business.


136 posted on 05/08/2006 9:46:12 PM PDT by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Myself, as the atheist I am, think it is imperative as a matter of biological survival to isolate homosexuals from society. They only spread communicable disease and mental deviancy, they should be quarantined.
137 posted on 05/08/2006 9:48:50 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

What a ridiculous comparison.


138 posted on 05/08/2006 9:51:40 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Comparing someone who is gay to a killer, much less a mass killer, even if loosely, puts you way, way out there on the continuum.

Not at all...

Homosexuals really hate human life; their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...

139 posted on 05/08/2006 9:52:13 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The anecdotal evidence is that folks resist going gay, until they realize that further resistance is futile, and destructive to the self (psychologically).

That's what the modern psych crowd would have you believe. The field of psychology is steadily moving in the direction of saying that denying any behavioral impulse is bad for you. Think of the ramifications of that for a minute. And people wonder why most of the therapists they know are head-cases themselves. The inmates really are running the asylum.

Have you read this article yet? If not, you should:

The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement (Caution, graphic contents)
140 posted on 05/08/2006 9:52:15 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 461-470 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson