Posted on 05/09/2006 11:12:12 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
Illuminati
propagandist! Everyone
knows that Newton is
still alive, playing
cards right now with Kennedy
somewhere in Paris . . .
My, you're very prickly for such a self-assured fan of science fiction.
It's not incumbent upon me to prove a negative.
It is incumbent upon the Darwinist to explain why there are zero pre-Cambrian trasitional forms.
Oh, I read English also.
She's not afraid that a large number of people who know a hell of a lot more than she does about biology think she's a complete idiot.
Of course, she's probably laughing all the way to the bank. After all, she's not one of the fools laying out $20.00 for this crud. I wonder does she really believe a word of it.
As a conservative and scientist, I am never thrilled to see people writing that only liberals believe in the scientific theories of evolution or if you study the theories you must be a liberal.
Coulter is right in pointing out that evolution is a religious faith. Note the personal insults and the anger when evolution is questioned.
The psycholigical attachment to evolution goes much deeper than science.
I was talking about redefining THEIR beliefs, so that they would be equal in the eyes of the law.
Currently, they are not viewed that way and we are playing catch up to them.
Good for you.
Machinists are not scientists and, as such, do not adhere to the scientifc method---which is constantly engaged in self-correction. Since you didn't know that (or you would have not used the quaint, little story about your dad) you're not sufficiently versed in science to be able to credibly criticize it.
What are you talking about? Every form is transitional.
They were in the '90s when she made her mark, and on campuses of colleges she attended.
we don't jail dissidents anyway.
But still some are afraid to speak their minds anyway i.e. Comedy Central
Ann Coulter is about the only public person I can think of who has said that McCarthy was basically right about Communist attempts to infiltrate our various cultural institutions, and that's what I've always believed.
How can you prove something that isn't true?
Until Coulter fans
work out the HTML
here's some Maria . . .
Show me where in Darwin's theory of evolution the creation of life is discussed, please.
It is painfully obvious she is completely ignorant about evolution.
Coulter's got a racket too. It's just a different kind of racket :-)
WND description, if accurate, reveals Anne to be scientifically illiterate from the very start. It will indeed make her look foolish. The synops is already full of easily debunked creationist talking points.
I never said that Darwin's theory of evolution discussed the creation of life. I asked about Abiogenesis.
Let's stick to the subject, shall we?
All dogs are animals, but not all animals are dogs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.