Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The game has not changed, we face the same enemy, same challenges. The Beast never dies!
May 10, 2006 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/11/2006 12:52:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

Edited on 05/11/2006 1:43:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 581-600 next last
To: Texasforever
The fact that he was a freeper was plastered all over the net. I just don't want the site to be tarred with that brush again.

I don't hang around the immigration threads much so I've missed your histrionics. Just where do you stand on illegal immigration?

321 posted on 05/11/2006 10:45:44 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
I don't hang around the immigration threads much so I've missed your histrionics. Just where do you stand on illegal immigration?

I'm agin it. I am just not NUTS about it.

322 posted on 05/11/2006 10:47:29 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

You've led a sheltered life.

What is really scary is seeing 2000 angry Mexican flag bearing persons demonstrating a block from my house chanting that they are going to take over my area and demanding that I and other like me leave.....and the local authorities stating that they have the right to intimidate me and others in that fashion..


323 posted on 05/11/2006 10:50:47 PM PDT by tertiary01 ( And don't waste your snide remarks on me: history will be your judge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I'm agin it. I am just not NUTS about it.

I'm not clear on what you mean. Is it something like, you're against it as long as you don't have to do anything about it???

324 posted on 05/11/2006 10:51:27 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
BTW if there are any histrionics going on it is from you and yours. If you want to get in bed with the likes of Simcox then you deserve what happens. There is no excuse for ignorance about him. The information is out there.
325 posted on 05/11/2006 10:51:44 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01
You don't know me so you have no right to make such accusations.

However, I'm not surprised. Since you can't refute the facts that Simcox is dangerous and there have been those on FR who have called for violence, you'd rather just attack the messenger.

326 posted on 05/11/2006 10:55:15 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
I'm not clear on what you mean.

Gee .. what part of "I'm against it", did you not understand what he meant?

327 posted on 05/11/2006 10:56:09 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
The information is out there.

I don't suppose in your wildest imaginings you could envision any of Simcox's statements being for effect; hyperbole even? Bluff and bluster; you know, sortof like pregame "smack"? You'll believe what you want to believe because I suspect it fits with your agenda.

328 posted on 05/11/2006 11:00:28 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Are you sure you want a piece of me Mo?


329 posted on 05/11/2006 11:01:29 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Even if it means having to suffer another Carter to enjoy another Reagan.

Bite your tongue! This country could not bear another Carter ... not in these times. I'm stunned any FReeper would make such a deal with the devil, willingly.

330 posted on 05/11/2006 11:02:20 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
I don't suppose in your wildest imaginings you could envision any of Simcox's statements being for effect; hyperbole even? Bluff and bluster; you know, sortof like pregame "smack"? You'll believe what you want to believe because I suspect it fits with your agenda.

Good lord woman/man this guy is nuts. He has had to wives each of whom has stated he is nuts. His 13 year old daughter accused him of attempted rape and his other wife won complete custody of their son because he was turning him into the same kind of nutcase he is.

331 posted on 05/11/2006 11:04:17 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Is that a threat?


332 posted on 05/11/2006 11:04:25 PM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I remember you. You said you were going to vote third party.

I said "don't let the door hit you on the way out"

I stand by that. We are stronger without single issue malcontents.


333 posted on 05/11/2006 11:05:30 PM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
"He had to pass amnesty to get another bill passed."

But wait a minute. (and the following is not directed at you personally because I have no idea if you've ever said any of it) I thought "opening the borders" was an impeachable offense. I thought it was unforgivable. I thought it was the ultimate betrayal of sovereign America. I thought it was the ultimate act of a charter member of the New World Order cabal. But it is OK to do it to "get another bill passed"? Wow.

334 posted on 05/11/2006 11:06:35 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
are tired of being taken for granted.

I hope you leave the republican party. I would not want you to feel taken for granted.

335 posted on 05/11/2006 11:07:51 PM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

Like I said, you'll believe what you want to believe. "To" ex-wives say he's nuts, eh? I'd go with that; sure.


336 posted on 05/11/2006 11:08:40 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Is that a threat?

Gee Mo, what part of "Are you sure you want a piece of me" don't you understand?

337 posted on 05/11/2006 11:09:54 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

It is not OK. The Rats would have blocked all of his anti Soviet stuff had he NOT passed amnesty, though.


338 posted on 05/11/2006 11:10:13 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

>>Then Tancredo had better bone up on who he is bed with and FR needs to know too. Is this an example of a rational man who unilaterally declares war on a country?<<

>>A message to the world: Do not attempt to cross the border illegally; you will be considered an enemy of the state; if aggressors attempt to forcefully enter our country they will be repelled with force if necessary!<<

Is this Simcox a Freeper?! This could have consequences.

This link makes it sound like he is with the Minutemen too

(PHOENIX, AZ) April 20, 2006 – Chris Simcox, President of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps,

http://www.minutemanhq.com/hq/

This is exactly the wrong approach.


339 posted on 05/11/2006 11:10:18 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Some folks around here, including me, are pretty upset about that.

You already declared for a third party. Don't get upset, go for it.

We may lose 1-3% of the vote, but by eliminating the angry, upset, strident, single issue right wingers, I figure we gain 2-4% of the others who are upset with the strident right wingers.

340 posted on 05/11/2006 11:10:45 PM PDT by staytrue (Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 581-600 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson