Skip to comments.
The game has not changed, we face the same enemy, same challenges. The Beast never dies!
May 10, 2006
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 05/11/2006 12:52:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Edited on 05/11/2006 1:43:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 581-600 next last
To: ForGod'sSake
Like I said, you'll believe what you want to believe. "To" ex-wives say he's nuts, eh? I'd go with that; sure. Man are you dense. I can see the vengeful ex-wife excuse once but when 2 say the same thing and every person that has dealings with him saying his clock is wound too tight then there are flames in that smoke.
341
posted on
05/11/2006 11:11:46 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: kingu
Even if that means I sit at home on election day. If that is your choice, please do it. We have no use for you and your attitude poisons the well and keeps us from attracting even more voters.
342
posted on
05/11/2006 11:12:36 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: gondramB
This link makes it sound like he is with the Minutemen too Is is the co-founder of the Minutemen.
343
posted on
05/11/2006 11:12:40 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: ForGod'sSake; Mo1
What the hell is the matter with you?
Threatening Mo1.
344
posted on
05/11/2006 11:13:48 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
To: JoJo Gunn
They want my vote? Actually we don't.
345
posted on
05/11/2006 11:13:49 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: Texasforever
>>This link makes it sound like he is with the Minutemen too
Is is the co-founder of the Minutemen.<<
Well I feel really out of the loop now - If he is still connected with the Minutemen with an approach like that I'll have to rethink support.
346
posted on
05/11/2006 11:14:55 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
We cann't expect to change RINO's minds but we can try and get rid of them. We will do better to get rid of our malcontents. The democrats would be in the majority if they got rid of theirs. The same applies to us.
347
posted on
05/11/2006 11:16:00 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: gondramB
Well I feel really out of the loop now - If he is still connected with the Minutemen with an approach like that I'll have to rethink support He has been all over TV and we have good freepers traveling with him now.
348
posted on
05/11/2006 11:16:07 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Texasforever
Look lightweight; back up some of your allegations against Simcox with something more than disgruntled ex-wives. I know little about the man, and since you've taken to waving your arms and spitting on your chin, I don't think I'll take your word for it. Surely you won't mind?
349
posted on
05/11/2006 11:18:10 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
Hey .. if you want to keep defending Simcox .. especially after what's just been posted
Go for
350
posted on
05/11/2006 11:19:50 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: Mo1
oh crap ... grrr
Go for = Go for it
351
posted on
05/11/2006 11:20:25 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
To: ForGod'sSake
Look lightweight; back up some of your allegations against Simcox with something more than disgruntled ex-wives. I know little about the man, and since you've taken to waving your arms and spitting on your chin, I don't think I'll take your word for it. Surely you won't mind? Who's the lightweight? I HAVE backed up my "allegations" both with his words and from others. You on the other hand are in a round room looking for a corner. If he wants sue sue me for libel he knows where to find me. You have lost this argument.
352
posted on
05/11/2006 11:20:43 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: onyx
Evening sunshine. You know I really can't stay and play long so I was just trying to nip something in the bud.
353
posted on
05/11/2006 11:21:18 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: ForGod'sSake
Evening sunshine. You know I really can't stay and play long so I was just trying to nip something in the bud. OOOH a tough guy. I don't think you have any pieces left.
354
posted on
05/11/2006 11:23:10 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: ForGod'sSake
You sound like you've been nipping something else.
355
posted on
05/11/2006 11:23:22 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
To: mathluv
We do need to 'send a message' to some of the RINOs among us I think We do need to 'send a message' to some of the single issue malcontents among us. That message is "You people are an embarassment, your anger is driving away other voters and we are better off without you."
356
posted on
05/11/2006 11:23:24 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
To: Thunder90
"The Rats would have blocked all of his anti Soviet stuff had he NOT passed amnesty, though."
So let me get this straight. Reagan had to compromise on some issues to win a war that had to be won. Yet Bush, faced with a weak Senate struggling with only a five seat Republican majority must toe the line on every issue, WOT be damned. Reagan can "sell out the country on immigration", but Bush needs to build a wall and deport every illegal tomorrow "if he wants the conservative base to vote for him". Again, I say...wow.
357
posted on
05/11/2006 11:24:19 PM PDT
by
Rokke
To: ForGod'sSake
I know little about the man, Then invite him on FR and he can get "a piece" of me.
358
posted on
05/11/2006 11:24:37 PM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I have neither been there nor done that.)
To: Mo1; Texasforever
Mo, you'll forgive me for not taking lightweight's word for it won't you. To tell you the truth, he seems a little unhinged himself. So, until such time he's able to present something more than anecdotal meanderings from ex-wives, I'll give Simcox the benefit of the doubt. Is that ok with you???
359
posted on
05/11/2006 11:27:46 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: G.Mason
I, for one, refuse to get drawn into another conservative VS conservative mud fight over this as I have in the past...I agree with the statement below ... it isn't (only) the Dems who are dividing us on the issue of illegal immigration. That responsibility lies with the President and a large numbers of GOP Senators." so what was that about not getting into a mudfight ?
let's see, it is the fault of Bush and the rinos but hey I'm not slinging any mud here. Nope. Not me.
360
posted on
05/11/2006 11:28:23 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 581-600 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson