We do need to 'send a message' to some of the RINOs among us, but laying down and accepting defeat overall is not the answer to how we do that.
We need to stand strong for W, because I believe he is standing strong for us. No one seems to consider all that he is having to face. The MSM is constantly barraging him, and us, with all of the things that he is doing wrong. We hear the war in Iraq is not working, but other, softer, voices say yes it is.
The enemy is at the gate. Are we going to stand strong, or let it in? 'We know who wants to let it in.
That's where I disagree. I think that W is purposely leaving our borders open and the result is going to be the disintegration of our culture.
These free trade treaties are erasing our national borders and in the eyes of people from third world countries we are inviting their lawless migration. The further proof they see of this is the socialist civil benefits we bestow upon them with no questions about US citizenship.
When Laura Bush applauded the Spanish version of God Bless America I almost vomited. As Republican legislators promote low cost loans, reducing the costs of medical care to nil, volunteering advanced education programs, restricting law enforcement that reduces the numbers of these illegal aliens I see this as advancing treason and marxism.
Five years ago I predicted we would be in this position that we are today. The Republican Party has become the step brother of the Democrats. Why hasn't Bush used his powers of veto even once? These legislators have common goals, that's why.
Yes, I scratched my head when Bush nominated moderates and Democrat holdovers to his cabinet and to senior administration positions: Colin Powell, Christi Todd Whitman, Paul O’Neill, George Tenet, etc.
Something fishy is going on. It became more obvious when he didn't veto the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act. Now it is more difficult than ever to get rid of the long time defenders of socialism.
When Bush planted Norman Minetta in his Cabinet as the Sec. of Transportation I was suspicious. Why would a R President implant a D Sec. of Transportation in his Cabinet unless the goals of both major political parties were lay ahead in the same direction? Did this mean that there was no secrets between the parties? IMO, yes that's what it does mean.
Ridge, Minetta, and Bush all joined hands about not arming airline pilots. Then when we demanded they do it, they composed the sloppiest, most inefficent plan ever to do it.
The way Bush supports the Border Patrol. An Eagle Boy Scout could do a better job of securing the borders than the Commander in Chief has done.
He's got a team in DC that is intent on destroying the American system of government and is placing us under a globalist World Order that rebukes the US Constitution.
I will not be surprised to see the Republican Party divide into the Conservative Republican Party and the Socialist Republican Party, the same way the Democrats now have the Progressive Democrats.
We are in for a rough ride in the coming years ahead as we try to stop this communist compassion for third world migration. My vote and financial backing will go to the Minutemen and the Constitution Party candidates, not members of the two morphed political parties.
I think We do need to 'send a message' to some of the single issue malcontents among us. That message is "You people are an embarassment, your anger is driving away other voters and we are better off without you."