Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wyoming sues feds over gun rights
The Casper [WY] Star-Tribune ^ | May 10, 2006 | TOM MORTON

Posted on 05/11/2006 10:42:47 AM PDT by archy

Wyoming sues feds over gun rights

By TOM MORTON

Star-Tribune staff writer

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Wyoming is suing the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court, centers on whether its the federal government or the state that has the final authority to restore gun rights to those guilty of misdemeanor domestic violence offenses.

Under federal law, people convicted of any misdemeanor crime of domestic violence used to be prohibited from possessing a firearm. In 1986, that changed: Those convicted could own a gun if their records were expunged.

A new Wyoming law, passed in 2004, set up a process for letting people convicted of misdemeanor offenses -- including, but not specifically, domestic violence acts -- regain their gun rights. The state, however, used a different definition of "expunge," setting off a series of battles with ATF.

In July 2005, ATF said it would notify federally licensed firearms dealers that concealed weapons permits from Wyoming were invalid unless the state changed its law.

Monday's lawsuit is the state's most recent response.

"The BATF's actions are an illegal attempt to force BATF's will upon the Wyoming Attorney General and Wyoming's duly elected legislature," wrote Attorney General Pat Crank and Senior Assistant Attorney General C. Levi Martin.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Wyoming; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: atf; bang; banglist; freestatewyoming; fsp; fsw; jackbootedthugs; jbt; libertarians; rkba; wy; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2006 10:42:49 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: archy; Becki; Joe Brower; Eaker; Faraday; hookman; jmc813; Lurker; MileHi; monkeywrench; Mulder; ...
FSW ping!


2 posted on 05/11/2006 10:44:04 AM PDT by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy

Good for Wyoming.


3 posted on 05/11/2006 10:45:09 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy

Good for Wisconsin.


4 posted on 05/11/2006 10:45:27 AM PDT by Feiny (Now go bang your heads on your desks until something useful comes out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms ... What a freakin' bunch of ass clowns.


From my cold dead hands.


5 posted on 05/11/2006 10:45:53 AM PDT by BigTom85 (Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy

Would you please ping me to any of your Wyoming pings?

Thanks!

RA


6 posted on 05/11/2006 10:45:54 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: archy
BATFE, Worst Agency Ever!


7 posted on 05/11/2006 10:49:57 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
State's rights are virtually none existant any more.

Now, thru administrative law, the Second Amendment is attacked. Sneaky.

There is a shadow government left by the Clintoons, I am convinced.

8 posted on 05/11/2006 10:52:04 AM PDT by llevrok (When they come to take my guns, I will give them the lead first....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
ATFE should be the name of a convenience store, not a Federal agency.

Those clowns should be putting tax stamps on whiskey bottles and cigarettes and nothing else. If it were up to me I'd make sure those stamps had to be licked, one at a time. None of that self-adhesive stuff, no way.

L

9 posted on 05/11/2006 10:52:42 AM PDT by Lurker (Anyone who doesn't demand an immediate end to illegal immigration is aiding the flesh trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: archy

I wish someone would sue Mass. and CA
If you own a gun in either state you are a criminal don't you know.


10 posted on 05/11/2006 10:53:42 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: archy

Bump for Wyoming's courage in facing down the jackbooted thugs of the ATF.


12 posted on 05/11/2006 11:11:11 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenth

ditto.


13 posted on 05/11/2006 11:13:39 AM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Recon they need border walls around them thar states? To keep them away from usn's since we ain't as smart as they is.


14 posted on 05/11/2006 11:14:31 AM PDT by catmanblack. (he is the great I AM-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Would you please ping me to any of your Wyoming pings?

Thanks!

I sure will, and you're of course most welcome.

15 posted on 05/11/2006 11:14:55 AM PDT by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: archy

I run into this across the nation and jurisdictions.

The same thing is called different names.

It does boil down to 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other.

only a bureacrat would love this.


16 posted on 05/11/2006 11:18:51 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Really, are you should lay off the MSM koolaid. I know hundreds of legal gun owning Californians. We also have lots of hunting in this state. Care to elaborate how that can come about if owning firearms here is illegal?


17 posted on 05/11/2006 11:41:06 AM PDT by tertiary01 (The Pubs have become a one dimensional party.(My way or the highway))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01

they must mean outlawing by regulation into inconvenience.

This is akin to Clintonista Mineta who continues to make the armed airline pilot program SO incovieninet and burdensome with rules that it functionally does not exist.


18 posted on 05/11/2006 11:51:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: archy

Thanks my friend. :-)


19 posted on 05/11/2006 12:04:55 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

There are lots (probably numbering over a million) of active gun owners in this state and all the gun stores in my area are doing well. As far as the climate of inconvenience, that is a problem but not unsurmountable, and there are the liberal antigun pockets like SF.

I am hardly an expert but I can see with my own two eyes. No one I know goes out in the woods unarmed.


20 posted on 05/11/2006 12:11:44 PM PDT by tertiary01 (The Pubs have become a one dimensional party.(My way or the highway))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson